We all contribute. We must all benefit. This is the law. This is the culture. If you need more money, add a percent to the sales tax. The Charter provides to us really what is government management guidelines. Why would you run policy that is contrary to the Charter? The Charter requires all benefits to be paid equally to all Canadians and services to be provided equally. Then, such benefits are logically helpful economically during the ongoing continued increase and use of robotic automation that cancels jobs, the usual means of and source of income for humans. Mechanisation or automation is an ongoing historical phenomenon and so is the chance of famine or slow economic times due to bad crops or drout. We collect and store wheat, milk powder and other foods for distribution to ensure the society and civilization stays alive, operational or viable. We collect and store money for consistent , continual distribution to the population to ensure everyone has money pursuant to our European culture and pursuant to the logic of ensuring people have money in light of the Joblessness caused by job automation where this money is collected. Without the money, the goods that include food produced mostly by machines do not sell. The manufacturer has spent money on machines to save money on salaries and wages. Human need continues. The goods are stolen; not purchased. The manufacturer who saved on wages with automation has not made any money if everything is stolen. There is an imbalance in the system. The provisions of paid supply of goods does not balance out with paid purchases or paid demand. There are two sides to the economy or the economic equation or system that we call supply and demand. We input a small factor of money into the system from what is collected from sales tax money we have all paid into the system and it works out, in our current economy with cost of living to ensure everyone has enough money for human safety, to .20 cents a minute. We think of it line the Kilowatt paid per minute to the machines in the factory. But we could pay less at .17 cents a minute but we should not embezzle that .03 cents per minute per citizen. It looks like .17 cents a minute is the current legal maximum. With out this money, the phenomena of theft continues due to some human anthropy that still struggles with the formality of the purchase for any fruits, vegetables, milks or wheat based products. This, you say, may be obvious but the income support is not being paid as it should pursuant to the law, as an expression of our culture or in furtherance of simple logic. France does not need your help but they don't mind your donations but you keep your commitments to your local population with what ever you might send to France as an honorarium. Where is the money? What are you doing with it since the RCMP is tracing the funds. See Fosket v. Mceown. When you are warned, you do not solve it and regularize your activities to match the Charter. So, when do you wake up one day and pretend to be like some King of France and because of your pretense, you do not work in your government job or in your unofficial potentate role during retirement to pay the benefit, get the benefit paid and ensure that the benefit is paid to all citizens and permanent residents in your country; as it is paid to all in France? You are not French then. Your pretense is not a defense to your conviction. You are convicted now under the laws of Canada. But, if you resolve it with your supplanting potentate influence, then there is a potential pardon to be granted immediately and maybe an award. But, we recounted the votes and realised that you never won.

  We all contribute. We must all benefit. This is the law. This is the culture.   If you need more money, add a percent to the sales tax.  The Charter provides to us  really what is government management guidelines.  Why would you run policy that is contrary to the Charter? The Charter requires all benefits to be paid equally to all Canadians and services  to be provided equally.   Then, such benefits are logically helpful economically during  the ongoing continued increase and use of robotic automation that cancels jobs, the usual  means of and source  of income  for humans.  Mechanisation or automation is an ongoing historical phenomenon and so is the chance of famine or slow economic times due to bad crops or drout. We collect and store wheat, milk powder and other foods for distribution to ensure the society and civilization stays alive, operational or viable. We collect and store money for consistent , continual distribution to the population  to ensure everyone has money pursuant to our European culture and pursuant to the logic of ensuring people have money in light of the Joblessness caused by job automation where this money is collected. Without  the money, the goods that include food produced mostly by machines do not sell.  The manufacturer has spent money on machines to save money on salaries and wages.  Human need continues. The goods are stolen; not purchased. The manufacturer who saved on wages with automation has not made any money if everything is stolen.  There is an imbalance in the system.  The provisions of paid supply of goods does not balance out with paid purchases or paid demand. There are two sides to the economy  or the economic equation  or system that we call supply and demand.  We input a small factor of money into the system from what is collected from sales tax money we have all paid into the system and it works out,  in our current economy with cost of living to ensure  everyone has enough money for human safety, to .20 cents a minute. We think of it line the Kilowatt paid per minute to the machines in the factory.   But we could pay less at .17 cents a minute but we should not embezzle that .03 cents per minute per citizen. It looks  like .17 cents a minute is the current legal maximum.  With out this money, the phenomena  of theft continues  due to some human anthropy that still struggles with the formality of the purchase for any fruits, vegetables, milks or wheat based products.  This, you say, may be obvious  but the income support is not being  paid as it should pursuant to the law,  as an expression  of our culture  or in furtherance of simple logic.  France does not need your help but they don't mind your donations but you keep your commitments to your local  population with what ever you might send to France as an honorarium. Where is the money? What are you doing with it since the RCMP is tracing the funds.  See Fosket v. Mceown.  

When you are warned, you do not solve it and regularize your activities to match the Charter.  So, when do you wake up one day and pretend to be like some King of France and because of your pretense, you do not work in your government job or in your unofficial potentate role during retirement to pay the benefit, get the benefit paid and ensure that the benefit is paid to all citizens and permanent residents in your country; as it is paid to all in France?  You are not French then.  

 Your pretense is not a defense to your conviction.  You are convicted now under the laws of Canada. But, if you resolve it with your supplanting potentate influence, then there is a potential pardon to be granted immediately and maybe an award.  But, we recounted the votes and realised that you never won.