An airline sends a wire transfer to one of its seat suppliers. The payment has arrived and is successful but is not applied to the specified account. There is no issue with the recipient information. But, the bank Employee required to apply the funds actually waits and says he would like to think he is earning interest for his bank ( an illegal use of funds in transit, failing to apply funds immediately) before the funds are applied although the interest is still earned on the market even when the funds are applied expeditiously, forthwith. More than two business days pass and then she wanted to play a game by suggesting to the sender, when noticing they are annoyed, that they could send the Transfer again, again and again hoping for duplicate transfers. She is fired for fraud. Her bank, the recieving bank, has to pay restitution for use of funds on every day that the payment was delayed. The wrong clerk working for the sender may resend the electronic funds transfer /EFT three times, debiting their account three times so the receiving bank would receive three transfers but only apply one to the actual customer recipient account. The other two would have to be dialled back; so to speak. The suggestion sent by email for the sender to resend the funds is a deception offence when funds are already received as they are only hoping for a duplicate or triplicate error transfer that the fraudsters would then keep for themselves. The funds are received. We know this. It is criminal fraud, attempt Fraud and Deception. It matters not that the sender is the government. The delay in payment is an interruption of Government business. It is a violation of the bank charter with the government.

 An airline sends a wire transfer to one of its seat suppliers. The payment has arrived and is successful but is not applied to the specified account.  There is no issue with the recipient information.   But, the bank Employee required to apply the funds  actually waits and says he would like to think he is earning interest for his bank ( an illegal use of funds in transit, failing to apply funds immediately) before the funds are applied although  the interest is still earned on the market even when the funds are applied expeditiously, forthwith.  More than two business days pass and then she wanted to play a  game by suggesting to the sender, when noticing they are annoyed, that they could send the Transfer again, again and again hoping  for duplicate transfers.  She is fired for fraud. Her bank, the recieving bank, has to pay restitution for use of funds on every day that the payment was delayed.  

The wrong clerk working for the sender may resend the electronic funds transfer /EFT three times, debiting their account three times so the receiving bank would receive three transfers but only apply one to the actual customer recipient account. The other two would have to be dialled back; so to speak.   The suggestion sent  by email  for the sender to resend the funds is a deception offence when funds are  already received as they are only hoping for a duplicate or triplicate error transfer that the fraudsters would then keep for themselves. The funds are received. We know this.  It is criminal fraud, attempt Fraud and Deception.  It matters not that the sender is the government. The delay in payment is an interruption of Government business. It is a violation of the bank charter with the government.