Possession for the purposes of trafficking is still on the statute book. So, even if you have one or two packaged personal use recreational quantities of marijuana on you, why do you feel business like and why do you feel like you are an enterprising young or old man or woman with questionable associations? Your favorite dvd is...Night School, American Gangster, Much ado about Nothing or is it Othello or Apocalypse Now? The police authorities can still make a presumption as to the purpose of the weed. They can presume that the weed is for the purposes of trafficking. It does seem you go to a condo once a day with the same Egg McMuffin breakfast in a Carl's Junior or the McDonalds bag with the weed underneath or you show up with the Gucci pebble grained leather Courier attache. So, once picked up with the personal amount of allegedly recreational quantity of weed, you can say it is personal and recreational but your Benz is so...how do you own it? What do you want with Warren's Angel Ronan(TM) files? You are not with the Lord, brother. You are not with Him. You must confuse possession of a file with ownership. If you possess the vehicle, do you own the vehicle? Where did you get it? It is not yours. This seems to be for trafficking and the girl texts you once a week about raspberry leafs and then you show up 1/2 an hour later so let us see what is going on. Oh; you are related to the One Big! So, we would let it go but he told you to buy only used vehicles without Sat Nav and this Benz has Sat Nav so you have to come with us and let us see your....organisation. Sze Sze. Do you know the old man in the neighborhood? He was innocent. In spite of the presumption as to the purposes of trafficking with 10 kilos of weed in plain view in his cupboard above the Miele stove near the vacuum, there was no evidence of trafficking in his case although he bought kilos of the drug since it is his legal right to buy toilet paper and also medical marijuana in bulk if he wants and the presumption that it was for the purposes of trafficking could not stand in court. His charges were withdrawn. The presumption was met in that his only purpose in buying the drug or lots of crisps in bulk or toilet paper in bulk was the personal and medical use of the drug. There was a properly executed warrant. Now, the success of the prosecution before the court and the presumption rests on one or two things and the Defence attorney is not emotionally invested in the Friedchickening file. He is like a referee with the Crown and the Judge and the Police Officer and everybody has a job to do to ensure there is due process. Did you get a proper warrant to seize the drugs or did you rely on a wing and prayer you lazy Scotland Yard bobby or Toronowanda police officer? Do you see what you are dealing with? Now as your fellow participant in the file, The Defence attorney does not mind the conviction that is properly obtained against the citizen who happens to be his client but we need people like the Defence Attorney who can go through the file and ensure due process is maintained. This is the whole Friedchickening point! Now, the only difference between a withdrawal of charges and a conviction is the properly executed warrant. Otherwise, it is a withdrawal of charges for the section 8 or bill of rights privacy violations. We are on the same side my friend !! It is not for you to deal out death and judgement my Frodo!! It is for the Court to decide! See Angel Ronan, Greenfield Urban(TM) Law Firm for more! by Warren A. Lyon, Litigator.

Possession for the purposes of trafficking is still on the statute book. So, even if you have one or two packaged personal use recreational quantities  of marijuana on you, why do you feel business like and why do you feel like you are an enterprising young or old man or woman  with questionable associations?  Your favorite dvd is...Night School, American Gangster, Much ado about Nothing or is it Othello or Apocalypse Now? The police authorities can still make a presumption as to the purpose of the weed. They can presume that the weed is for the purposes of trafficking.  It does seem you go to a condo once a day with the same Egg McMuffin breakfast in a Carl's Junior or the McDonalds   bag with the weed underneath or you show up with the Gucci pebble grained leather Courier attache.

So, once picked up with the personal amount of allegedly recreational quantity of weed, you can say it is personal and recreational but your Benz is so...how do you own it?  What do you want with Warren's Angel Ronan(TM) files? You are not with the Lord, brother.  You are not with Him.   You must confuse possession of a file with ownership. If you possess the vehicle, do you own the vehicle? Where did you get it? It is not yours.  This seems to be for trafficking and the girl texts you once a week about raspberry leafs and then you show up 1/2 an hour later so let us see what is going on.  Oh; you are related to the One Big! So, we would let it go but he told you to buy only used vehicles without Sat Nav and this Benz has Sat Nav so you have to come with us and let us see your....organisation. Sze Sze. Do you know the old man in the neighborhood? He was innocent.  In spite of the presumption as to the purposes of trafficking with 10 kilos of weed in plain view in his cupboard above the Miele stove near the vacuum,  there was no evidence of trafficking in his case although he bought kilos of the drug since it is his legal right to buy toilet paper and also medical marijuana in bulk if he wants and the presumption that it was for the purposes of trafficking could not stand in court. His charges were withdrawn. The presumption was met in that his only purpose in buying the drug or lots of crisps  in bulk or toilet paper  in bulk was the personal and medical use of the drug. There was a properly executed warrant.    Now, the success of the prosecution before the court and the presumption rests on one or two things and the Defence attorney is not emotionally invested in the Friedchickening file. He is like a referee with the Crown and the Judge and the Police Officer and everybody has a job to do to ensure there is due process. Did you get a proper warrant to seize the drugs or did you rely on a wing and prayer you lazy  Scotland Yard bobby or Toronowanda police officer? Do you see what you are dealing with? Now as your fellow participant in the file,   The Defence attorney does not mind the conviction that is properly obtained against the citizen who happens to be his client  but we need people like the Defence Attorney  who can go through the file and ensure due process is maintained. This is the whole Friedchickening point!    Now, the only difference between  a withdrawal of charges and a conviction is the properly executed warrant.  Otherwise, it is a withdrawal of charges for the section 8 or bill of rights privacy violations. We are on the same side my friend !! It is not for you to deal out death and judgement my Frodo!! It  is for the Court to decide!

See Angel Ronan, Greenfield Urban(TM)  Law Firm for more!

by Warren A. Lyon,  Litigator.