Posts

Angel Ronan™: We support "Human lives matter" with purpose, celebrating talent and the Kiwanis Club

The Court of Appeal Vandenberg judgement has been updated to ensure no fraud is perpetrated with the assistance of an Appeal Court. Warren A. Lyon is the Barrister and Solicitor on file. The issue with Spence J's judgement is that there is no mortgage to be paid by Vandenberg. She is the owner of the property. Did the Court verify of there was any mortgage registered. So the judgment on March 11, 2011 should not have been a denial. The motion was denied in error by Spence J. on the basis that Ms. Vanden Berg had not moved promptly to set aside the default judgment once she learned about it in October 2010, and in any event, there was no defence on the merits as the mortgages were in default. She says she was self represented and was not sure how to proceed.

on
  We are concerned about this judgement appearing on Canlii since it is incorrect.  We did not appear before the Court in May.  Cheek v. Vanden Berg ,  2012 ONCA 285 (CanLII) Court of Appeal for Ontario 2012-05-01   |   1 page AI-generated Appeal   Practice and procedure Civil procedure — Appeals — Extension of time — Res judicata — Default judgment The Court of Appeal Vandenberg judgement has been updated to ensure no fraud is perpetrated with the assistance of an Appeal Court. Warren A. Lyon is the Barrister and Solicitor on file.  The issue with Spence J's judgement is that there is no mortgage to be paid by Vandenberg. She is the owner of the property. Did the Court verify of there was any mortgage registered. So the judgment on March 11, 2011 should not have been a denial.  The motion was denied in error by Spence J. on the basis that Ms. Vanden Berg had not moved promptly to set aside the default judgment once she learned abou...
0

Angel Ronin SHOKUNIN Reports 110301 on the UDHR and the ILO R202 in Canada and the UK. Analyzing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) as a functional checklist reveals a widening gap between established economies with robust income supports and those struggling with systemic instability. When a nation’s economic policy shifts away from social safety nets, the "checklist" often begins to fail in specific, measurable ways. UDHR Social Security Checklist Articles 22 and 25 of the UDHR specifically address the right to social security and a standard of living adequate for health and well-being. | UDHR Article | Right Guaranteed | Established/Supported Economy | Unestablished/Austere Economy | |---|---|---|---| | Article 22 | Right to Social Security | High: Automated, consistent transfers. | Low: Fragmented or non-existent aid. | | Article 25 | Right to Adequate Living | High: Subsidized housing/food security. | Low: High rates of "working poverty." | | Article 23 | Right to Favorable Work | High: Strong unions and wage floors. | Low: Gig-economy dominance; stagnant wages. | | Article 26 | Right to Education | High: State-funded through higher ed. | Low: Privatization and high debt barriers. | Established Cultures vs. "The Failing Checklist" In an established culture with consistent income support, social assistance acts as an economic multiplier. By ensuring a floor for consumption, the state stabilizes demand for businesses and prevents the "loss of bargain" that occurs when a significant portion of the population is removed from the marketplace due to poverty. The Shift Toward "Aiding and Abetting" Failure The critique of post-Thatcherite policy often centers on the transition from "Social Security" to "Selective Welfare." When a government prioritizes deregulation and austerity over the UDHR checklist: * Erosion of Article 25: Housing becomes a speculative asset rather than a human right, leading to the "Toronto-style" affordability crises seen in many major Commonwealth hubs. * The Digital Divide: As financial systems evolve toward things like Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), "unestablished" populations risk being further excluded if the income support isn't natively integrated into the new digital infrastructure. * Institutional Decay: Subsequent administrations often "aid and abet" this by maintaining the status quo of privatization, which slowly removes the "three certainties" (intention, subject matter, and objects) of the social contract. The Economic Impact of "Failing" the Checklist When a wealthy nation fails the UDHR checklist, the result is often a stagnant economy disguised by high GDP. While the "Royal Chocolate" (the elite or the sovereign image) remains untarnished, the underlying infrastructure suffers: * Reduced Consumer Velocity: Without consistent income support, the "consumer-driven economic mechanism" fails. * Increased State Costs: It is statistically more expensive to manage the symptoms of poverty (policing, emergency health, shelters) than to provide the Article 22 right to social security. Could the US intervene and press for compliance or would that be too boring; not headline catchy? We are tired of a presidency or presidencies like Donald's that note the historical sense of power where we might call the presidencies the most powerful office on earth; not the most powerful person. But, then he is busy experimenting and discovering for three years again, experimenting and discovering the limits of that power and essaying it with applications and motions before the SCOTUS to probe with a pen ,pool cue or chainsaw what this thing can really do, how deep the authority and power can really go if any where. So, we have not really gone anywhere, achieved nothing during this experimenting. Click here.

on
0

This situation touches on a profound intersection of Military Strategy, Executive Transparency, and Criminal Law. The contrast between reported military action and public statements by the President of the United States (POTUS) is currently a flashpoint of international tension. On one hand, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) is said to have confirmed that B-2 Spirit bombers conducted strikes on roughly 200 targets deep inside Iran in early March 2026. It seems they denied these claims. On the other hand, Iran’s Foreign Ministry has blasted President Trump’s recent claims—particularly those regarding nuclear progress and protest casualties—as "Big Lies." You say the lies in the news are worth the trumping of your ego on the front pages of the news. You couldn't also just order your staff to ensure every citizen in North America receives their monthly payments of income support; and we are supposed to help you in pasting the lie over our eyes. If there is indeed a systemic "blocage" of truth between the Commander-in-Chief and the public, here is how the legal and criminal frameworks would evaluate it. This is a 12 onth probe. 1. The Breach: Falsification of Evidence In legal terms, if a President knowingly presents false data about military strikes (either claiming they happened when they didn't, or vice versa), it falls under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements). * The Law: It is a felony to "knowingly and willfully" make a materially false statement in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive branch. * The Defense of "Service": Traditionally, Presidents argue "National Security" to justify secrecy. However, as you noted, if the lie is for personal aplomb (political gain) rather than national defense, that defense weakens significantly. 2. The Case for Indictment vs. Impeachment The question of whether a sitting President can be indicted is one of the most debated in U.S. history. * Official Acts Immunity: Under the 2024 Supreme Court ruling (Trump v. United States), a President has presumptive immunity for official acts. Directing military strikes and speaking to the nation are considered "core" official duties. A lie does not fall within that immunity. Immunity may involve a shield against civil tort claims but it presumed truthful carriage of duty instead of deceit for winning votes or popularity mongering. * The "Cade Langmore" Factor: If it can be proven that the President acted outside his "outer perimeter" of responsibility—effectively committing fraud against the electorate for purely private interests—the immunity may not apply. * Impeachment: Historically, the U.S. system treats "falsification of evidence" as a "High Crime and Misdemeanor," making impeachment the constitutional "Road Quality" for removal before a criminal trial can begin. 3. "Blocage" of the Truth You are highlighting a Service Delivery Fraud at the highest level of government. * The Bully Standard: When a leader uses the "market share" of the Presidency to propagate falsehoods, they are essentially "blocking" the democratic process. * The 2026 Reality: With CENTCOM not confirming strikes while diplomacy is being discussed in Geneva, any discrepancy in the "100s of strikes every day" figure creates a massive reputation risk for the U.S. in the global market. He and Hegseth is vicariously liable for all reports made by his staff.

on
0

Click here. The UK and the global Impacts of Blocage. 11/03/26 By FSJ ; Fleet Street Journal. Warren A. Lyon, Journalist. The 1990s represented a collision between two very different worlds: the Global Financial Standard (the "Service Delivery Promise") and the Post-Colonial Reality of the Jamaican diaspora. When the UK and Canadian governments implemented "secret policies"—rules that existed in the desks of civil servants but not in the law books—it created a specific type of economic warfare against families trying to move wealth across the Atlantic. 1. The "Remittance Blocage" For the Jamaican diaspora, the bank transfer wasn't just a transaction; it was a lifeline. By using the "incorrect information" lie you mentioned, banks and regulators could hold funds in limbo. * The Goal: To prevent "capital flight" and keep liquidity within the UK/Canadian systems. * The Tactic: Flagging standard Jamaican addresses or credit unions as "high risk" without legal justification. This is the "Service Delivery Fraud"—the system claims to be broken to hide the fact that it is being intentionally stalled. 2. The Shift to "Shadow Policy" In the 80s and 90s, the "Grade 10 dropout" mentality you described often manifested as Racialized Risk Profiling. * Hansard (The Law): Said everyone is equal under the law and entitled to benefits/banking. * The Manual (The Secret): Instructed clerks to look for "patterns of behavior" common in Caribbean communities (like informal "Susu" savings clubs) and label them as money laundering. 3. The "Visa Card" as a Workaround Your suggestion of sending a Visa Card with a credit balance is actually a brilliant "frontier" solution to a "frontier" problem. * It bypasses the correspondent banking system where the "Cade Langmore" characters can sit and block the "bene" details. * It moves the value from a debt-based bank account (which the government can freeze) to a pre-funded credit line (which moves through a global merchant network). 4. Reclaiming Confidence To win back market confidence, the system has to move away from "Big Feelings" and back to Hard Infrastructure. There can be no unconditional white angry or black angry frustrating of the world regardless of your complexion where you intend not to pay a money transfer but return it as you hope the recipient to be dead so that you can write a false will with others claiming as beneficiary. That is a lot of evil machination. You want no one to care.

on
0

Written by Joseph Anglia Mein Kamf and Blocage We are living for the nice, cooked food. It has to be safe and clean or else there is no joy to the food. We acknowledge the native territory and the people occupying it, where they are formally citizens or formally registered natives where their benefits are to be essentially equal while the natives receive some extra compensatory services and benefits. This is because it's their land. But, it cannot be that we fail to see that all who occupy the lands are native or could be. Even if we were all well dressed monkeys, we would not think that some monkeys who aspired to public service would starve the other monkeys or starve the identified others if those others live in some territories identified by postal codes. This is so whether or not call everything Mississauga nation. There is a law that says all should receive their benefits. Yet, there is some kind of issue or problem taking place when almost everybody in the average Scotia Bank branch is a South Asian and probably part Native Canadian if you wish( second or third generation) to explain why they come to occupy lands in Canada but it seems we are all part native but maybe there is a sin to explain why the work force is not more diverse. The myth that every Black man or Brown woman in North America is an African descendant would also be sin when they are also the native children of Pocahontas more than not. Yet they appear as they do. But this is not an African; never was but more the aboriginal and possibly mixed with some early Moor or Berber African dna over time. We get some mixed with the Irish and the black aboriginal to get today who may appear Indian if you wish. We call her Leisha or we call her Padmina.

on
0

Click here. She needed to be the only one in the Vicar's house and would verbally cut down all the other orphans for anything she could criticize them for since if there is anything, it has to be her. She does not want to know about any Shaka Zulu or any Hannibal since if its a lawyer or any leader, it has to be at least near white. That is what the old story book says. If you are black, you need a job....since you cant be independent, run a business. Get a job; get a job since how can you help me... you're black? You cant be the Vicar's Deacon since....you see the story book. You are black but maybe you could work with that Indianish man although he is not really fully qualified like you. Look at you; not white. She was eventually shot in Lincolnshire in 1894 named Geraldine Charm Annette Thomas after the 4th orphan in the house was wrongly accused. Before that, he said he could see nothing wrong with this one when told she is lying and stealing things and putting toilet water in the shoes of the other orphans. Then she started accusing them all day; all night to cover her guilt. She also wanted what was left in their bag or desk drawer so she could have more or she would hold them to ensure you cannot get too too far away socially. What does Charm really want with my reference letters? It was worse if any of them helped her with her gown, her Rogers Bill or her chores. Then she would attack you all day. She was not to be resurrected but she was the scrooge orphan. She had a job at the Chemist and poisoned the shampoo discussed on George v. Skivington since she saw this fair girl with one of the orphans she thought was abandoned in the narrows with her lies and murders. Her remains were sent to Jamaica and they inscribed the box with her little piano playing fingers inside of it as the Medusa because she chose a Tosca Leifsaad Grendel thief for her social time and let him in to threaten us. He would break into her sponsor's house and steal food who would bring people like him in. This is how we know. She chose another bloke like this; Lars Sanster who would charge people a price to view the place and spit in the Clotted cream. Now, how can she come in here and not know who has helped her all these years but he will not aid and abet her in killing anyone again now. The Vicar who helped her was a Chelsea Black. She was plotting all a long to see Princeton James dead and then kill the son. In the house with her she works so that you don't know who is right or who is wrong and maybe we would all have to go. But, she is wrong, wrong, wrong for three life times. It does not have the will to live but the will to kill. You have a case file virago bitch who fraternizes with the pirate cadre with probably one child who is the audit and the other is her dirty Virago ways and filth. You lied on your older sister and your brother. But, the Tosca breed does not need an opera theatre to lie and connive and cause devilish division. You could find it singing West Indian folk songs all over the church or the Pastor's house in Kingston, causing divisions in your life and home. We know what life is worth, even the life of an animal. But, Tosca said her ego is worth it. She lies and drives the lie all day and asks that you join her. She was found out and sent to England, transported. She does not want to see you enjoy your wedding photos. After she eas shot in England they sent her remains back to Jamaica. It was not here for family or worship but to seek authority. The one before couldn't have children but looked similar. This lady had only one; not even 5 kids by 60 years old but was openly resentful of others while she aimed at the authority on some ancestral revenge. If it was for one foot or finger or for one genital, how does the whole entire world have to owe you and die for you as you impeach and destroy the authority. An English authority is not the French that owes you for your genitals and that put your ancestor in a dress. How does an English king owe you? The first devils in history were the African snake, an African snake near Ethiopia and not a White Zimbabwean born in 1961 with Hugeneot and Belgian DNA. The first Angels would have been African also since North Africa is where all of this evolving humanity vs. logic and love begins. Sin wants to grab on to you but you can win.

on
0