Posts

Angel Ronan™: We support "Human lives matter" with purpose, celebrating talent and the Kiwanis Club

The contrast between mid-century broadcast television and modern prestige drama reflects a fundamental evolution in how media engages with morality, institution, and human culture. The Mid-Century Ideal: Order, Virtue, and Domestic Reassurance Mid-20th-century classics like I Love Lucy, Leave It to Beaver, The Honeymooners, and My Three Sons operated within a strictly regulated framework governed by the National Association of Broadcasters Television Code. These shows provided a cultural anchor during the post-WWII era, presenting a world where: Conflict was harmless and self-correcting: Missteps—whether Lucy’s exaggerated schemes or Beaver’s childhood blunders—were resolved within 30 minutes, cleanly restoring domestic harmony. Institutions were inherently benign: Family, community, and local authority figures served as guardians of civic virtue, offering unambiguous moral clarity. Flaws were comedic foibles: Even Ralph Kramden’s hot-headed bombast was fundamentally toothless, framed around working-class frustration and earnest ambition rather than genuine. Click here.

 The contrast between mid-century broadcast television and modern prestige drama reflects a fundamental evolution in how media engages with morality, institution, and human culture. The Mid-Century Ideal: Order, Virtue, and Domestic Reassurance Mid-20th-century classics like I Love Lucy , Leave It to Beaver , The Honeymooners , and My Three Sons operated within a strictly regulated framework governed by the National Association of Broadcasters Television Code. These shows provided a cultural anchor during the post-WWII era, presenting a world where: Conflict was harmless and self-correcting: Missteps—whether Lucy’s exaggerated schemes or Beaver’s childhood blunders—were resolved within 30 minutes, cleanly restoring domestic harmony. Institutions were inherently benign: Family, community, and local authority figures served as guardians of civic virtue, offering unambiguous moral clarity. Flaws were comedic foibles: Even Ralph Kramden’s hot-headed bombast was fundamentally ...

Uncle Tom Huckleberry. The summer of 1960 smells like freshly cut grass and Coca-Cola. A tight-knit gang of kids gathers around grainy black-and-white television screens, cheering as the Bill Russell and Tom Cousey with Heinsoum Celtics battle the Knicks. They run through the alleys playing like the Little Rascals, drifted through long afternoons with the sun-drenched, melancholic nostalgia of Stand by Me. Inside their living rooms, race drops away at the front door—whether a white mother or a Black mother is plating up bologna sandwiches and passing around ice-cold sodas. Their youth peaks on a polished gymnasium floor: winning the high school basketball championship, immortalized in a flashbulb team photo where seven smiling boys stand shoulder to shoulder. Then adulthood fractures the pack. One white boy moves to Manhattan, pushing mail carts through the slick carpeted halls of a Madison Avenue ad agency. Two Black boys and one white friend enlist in the Army, trading high school jerseys for olive fatigues. Two other Black friends stack crates at the local grocery store, studying for college entrance exams under the fluorescent lights after hours. The last white kid, Ward, stays behind to join the city police department. On his first day, he is assigned to a veteran officer—a second-generation Southerner with dead eyes and a heavy badge. The veteran leans over his desk, presses a snub-nosed revolver into Ward’s hand, and asks a cold question: "You got Black friends?" Panic paralyzes the rookie. Sweat beads on his forehead, his throat closes, and he gives only a tight, ambiguous nod before bolting out the precinct doors. Desperate, Ward races across town to warn his childhood friends, pleading with them to pack their bags and leave the city for a year until the heat clears. When Ward returns to the precinct to report for duty, the old cop eyes him down. "Good. But you aren't riding with me. I don't kill skin color; I kill bad people. And tonight, I'm taking out three bad Black men. You're coming to watch." In the neon-soaked grime of prostitution alley, Ward watches in horror as the veteran executes two notorious pimps, followed by a violent husband who beat his wife to death after she threatened to leave him over bringing syphilis home. Ward screams that it's wrong, that this isn't justice—until the night shifts again, and Ward watches the old cop execute three white mobsters with the exact same ruthless neutrality, a white lady who kept leaving her bus driver common law husband for any man with a foreign accent that she hears in public and a black woman named Samantha Bulgger who lived in criminal trespass to property and conspired to kill the rightful occupants with her black church, that kept stealing the mail of her fellow church members because she said she felt like garbage and needed to feel people just as down as she felt so she would feel emotionally equal. She never got to the "..do unto others as you would have them do unto you... forgive as you wish to be forgiven" style in her faith or allowed the Lord to help. The older officer took a lock of hair after killing her and mixed it with a Sacrament cracker and took it to the nuns. They made two babies; one boy and one girl so Samantha was born again who would hear an officer the first time he or she speaks and not resist. In this case her death was legal since it was criminal trespass. She was warned by the Good neighbour to leave now in all Christian mercy. They were very patient over 2 months at the front door because Samantha was Deacon Collis Bulggers adoption. He almost asked for a gun to shoot her himself. But he let the police do it. Why was she still at the property after going to Court, being convicted and recieving several warnings? If the officer was not 6 foot, she did not hear them. Ward understood. This one was legal. Then there was this Chinese girl named Eveonoff with a proper North American accent who broke into Bill's house every time he went on tour because she felt abandoned and wanted to know if it was really him she saw on tv or in the news for professionalism since that was authorities, achievements. She used his name for a mortgage reference also and got a mortgage write off. But her behaviour said she was racist and could not believe it was him but harassed him. She said when he comes back to see her children in the house that he has to be white or don't let him in. He knew her from grade 2 with Mrs. Battle and was very sad about her; that any innate racism in her survived all the school trips, nurture and laughter. Her determination was Babylonian; that the police would do as she wants and refused to leave. She seems to have wanted to lay down with him as his wife and see if he was Chinese maybe since how else could he be black and professional? The Chinese lady at the restaurant where he eats roast chicken and ribs gave her some of the ginger soda he left in a glass on his last visit; half full. They did not understand her either. He worked there as a kid, cooking and bussing. In her Babylonian calculations but after Eveonoff got convicted, she sent a son who was a murder convict to the FBI. His name was Kash Patel; born on Carey Crescent in Markham Massachusetts. She asked the police to help her in that town for a box of Cup Noodles since she called them soft. She robbed the bank and damaged German vehicles in her need for Asian hegemony. They did not arrest her yet but they made a note of the occurrences and she paid cash for her sinful ways since they were soft but it went too far. She was convicted. But, they failed to serve and protect. She said she was the devil and would rule Arkham or Markham with drugs. Based on her request, she was legally dead and so was Kash but she wanted to see him on TV as the infamous Kash Baddie (..not a real legal entity so you cannot offend him) who was suspended at Milliken High in school and never came back. He applied to University 6 times with Shannon Bone who lived on Riseborough but was not qualified. FBI are never presented as Hon. anything. Eveonoff gave her friend Shannon some oil from Eveonoff's panties. She chanted all day, "..I am Babylon rejected by Egypt and Israel and Need To Be Accepted..my DNA will inherit from my friend." Kash is legally dead and cannot own again; just food like an airline passenger. He has no power of arrest. But he has the media spectacle and looks like celebrated like the imaginary pretender heir. His father Tom dated Shannon Bone when they were all in Grade five. His father was in grade six. Own day when Bill got a B in Spanish and French, Shannon walked Bill after school to the school front door and applauded him. As soon as Bill walked out the door, Shannon said to Tom "..catch him, beat him Tom.." and he ran after Bill with Animalistic vehemence because she promised Tom her mother's house; some kind of Haitian shanty town people scenario. We asked Tom why he did not stop and was so determined. They wanted to know why Bill didn't just run back into the school but he said home was the safest. His mother in the house was not his real mother. She was in Vermont. His sister was not his real sister; therefore. Bill went to university and ran into a Mexican girl from Tijuana or a Sri Lankan named "Shaunnickurpapersa" who sat down beside him in the cafeteria. She invited him to come to the bra shop with her. She was intending to plagiarism him, accuse him or impeach him over sex and graduate before using his work; a personification of evil. She did this to a guy from Connecticut that looked like Sidney Poitier who was working on his second year of law; spoke like him too. The guy from Connecticut called the cops when the school security told him but he had to complain. She was withdrawn but was determined to use a Black guy who was more the bible reader. She was more the Babylonian who read the media and TV while claiming to be the student of the happy Buddha but when does Buddha lie and use people? A Babylonian might as they try to lock you in Daniel's den; ambushed. She was not a bad Buddha student but not the best. The message she got from the media was white hegemony but said white people are soft for panties or cleavage. She said the message is what the message is but with lots of happy black equality and achievement. Everyone should at least have their living benefits. Ward reflected on all of this and how some of these people over all these years may have been Big Brothers etc or Guardian Angels but also dealing or pimping. He pulled up an open file from Texas where all US Officers/ Guardsmen are provided a bonus to resolve it and went down there to deal with it himself; a serial killer named Candy who was a Sunday School teacher that burned her neighbour's Disney book and Video collection down, that killed the women in the parish area with any chance she got. He showed up and shot her; dead when she opened the front door. Her accomplice in some of these deaths was Donna Barkwell who fled to Toronto. He showed up and shot her where she was hiding in Pickering, Ontario at Barnwood Square with these nice people. Click here.

Joel 3

Army Green

Badminton.

Coca Cola and Free Trade: SDGCK REPORTS. September 14th, 2026. By Scot Nakagmura and John Quigley, SDGCK Directors. Research provided by Warren A. Lyon. Your economy is like a San Francisco Street without electricity wires for the street car. Wouldn't we sell more products globally if there was free trade and then also hire more people? Free trade is what Coca Cola has advocated for decades. You are hoping that of we cancel free trade or the bottlers and offices for Coca Cola or Budweiser in other countries, then there would be more work for Americans at home. You fail to see that work of that kind is done by a machine. Also, you are too confident that the world will be willing to buy the Coca Cola in the same quantities with added tariff costs and see the cans or bottles shipped. Coca Cola loses time and money in this idea. Tariffs slow down trade. The machine is doing the work. A market with an able and properly financed consumer is what you need if all Americans or North Americans have at least $ USD 1000.00 per week as the minimum benefit paid to all North Americans. The world is really a market for goods; mostly European goods now anyway after Mondelez; some American goods also. TARIFFS do not help this fact scenario. S.R. Covey talked about the win-win in every deal or negotiation. It's quoted by many. With tariffs, there is no win-win. But you should not let pirate scavengers into your economic war room to make decisions; not a business man but a mannequin avatar who is really a pirate scavenger. If no one else took full opportunity, you believed he would based on his alleged business background. Nothing is true. Study him and understand. This could not really happen again or continue for another day yet if it did, we would now understand that we cannot rely on a personality, a very inflexible, chiselled, imitable personality to design roads, highways, subways and economies. He is otherwise a cunning con artist. Click here.

TITLE: BITTEN APPLE INT. LIVING ROOM - DAY (1977) Midday sunlight cuts through thick dust. The TV blares The Price is Right. ARTHUR (20s, gaunt, wincing as he clutches his left jaw) sits on a stained sofa, eyes glued to a Commodore PET computer resting on a coffee table next to a stack of vinyl records—Crime of the Century, Songs in the Key of Life. Outside, a pea-green Ford Pinto backfires. ARTHUR (whispering) Oh wretched man that I am... Romans seven. Arthur gargles a capful of red mouthwash, winces at his bleeding gums, and spits directly into a metal dog bowl on the floor. A ragged stray dog growls, steps forward, and violently flips the bowl, soaking the carpet. ARTHUR (eyes cold) You don't reject me. Nobody rejects me. CLICK HERE.

Supply and Demand Charts for improved consumer stimulus.

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH & FLEET STREET FINANCIAL DISPATCH LONDON — SEPTEMBER 2025 — SPECIAL ECONOMIC INVESTIGATION THE ARCHITECTURE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE MECHANICS OF UNIVERSAL DEMAND An Analytical Examination of the Post-War Industrial Order, the Fallacy of Unfettered Laissez-Faire, Mechanisation, and the State-Guaranteed System of Participatory Remuneration BY OUR SPECIAL ECONOMIC CORRESPONDENT IN FLEET STREET, Warren A. Lyon. LONDON — In the tenth year following the cessation of European hostilities in 1955, as the Western world navigates the transition from wartime economic controls to the mid-century industrial consensus, thoughtful observers in Fleet Street, Westminster, and the City must confront a fundamental problem of political economy. The modern capitalist apparatus—stretching across the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth, North America, and Western Europe—operates upon a single, immutable law: the imperative equilibrium between Supply and Demand. Yet, despite the vast expansion of mechanized production, factory automation, and electronic computation, our financial architectures continue to suffer from a crippling structural defect: the systemic failure to guarantee requisite consumer purchasing power across the whole of the populace. I. THE LESSONS OF THE POST-WAR CONSCIOUSNESS: SUPPLY, DEMAND, AND THE ELECTRIC CIRCUIT To comprehend the crisis of modern industrial organization, one must discard the antiquated Victorian dogma that human existence is defined solely by manual toil. Under the classical doctrine of laissez-faire, labour was treated as an elastic commodity, hired when factories required muscle and cast aside into poverty when machines replaced handiwork. In an age dominated by automatic machinery, conveyor systems, and early electronic computing, such a doctrine is not merely obsolete; it is actively destructive to the civic health of the realm. Consider the macro-economic structure as an electrical power grid carrying a constant current of thirty amperes. Under a rational and balanced order, this current is bifurcated equally along two parallel conductors: fifteen amperes are directed to energise the lamp of Industrial Supply (the manufacturing apparatus, capital investment, and technological innovation), while the remaining fifteen amperes flow uninterrupted to power the lamp of Demand—the Ability to Pay vested within the consumer public. In an unregulated laissez-faire system, however, an artificial blockage is introduced along the conductor powering Consumer Demand. It acts as a deliberate obstruction—resembling a corkscrew jammed into the brass fittings of a ship's engine room. The electrical energy, unable to reach the lamp of Demand, encounters extreme resistance; heat builds rapidly within the circuit, insulation scorches, and the entire socio-economic edifice is threatened with catastrophic conflagration. Energy in an economic system, like energy in physics, is never destroyed; if it is denied its proper outlet in legitimate consumer spending, it manifests as market collapse, civil unrest, shoplifting, and social decay. Click here.