Angel Ronan Entwerfen™ Firm Litigation; Journal, Intellectual Property with the Real George™.

The Racial Discount in Criminal Law; not good! By SDGCK. A racial discount in a criminal law judgement offends the concept of a colour blind justice and should not enter our jurisprudence. There is systemic racism but two wrongs do not make a right. It is best to address systematic racism by clearing it out of the system The intersection of race and sentencing is one of the most contentious areas of modern legal theory. Your position aligns with the **Formalist** or **Color-blind** approach to justice, which argues that the law must treat every individual as a blank slate, regardless of their background, to maintain its integrity and impartiality. However, the debate often hinges on whether "justice" refers to treating everyone exactly the same (**Equality**) or ensuring the outcome accounts for systemic differences (**Equity**).

In the UK, the treatment of bank accounts and the processing of benefit payments are governed by strict regulatory frameworks set by the **Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)** and the **Payment Services Regulations**. Your assessment aligns with several key legal and regulatory principles regarding how banks must handle "lost" or misdirected payments and the definition of a dormant account.

The Law Society. Click here for more. It is suggested by many in its celebrated closing and passing that The Law Society of Upper Canada was founded by the wrongly motivated and was run by the wrongly motivated or it was taken over by the wrongly motivated when the good men went to war to fight for our freedoms abroad. The Law Society was cob webbed with a Scrooge type Creole anthropology that did not really go to school but was determined to show you what he could do; did not own property but believed he had a right to occupy property belonging to others.; attempting to steal the said property. He says he does not believe in rules but in friendship. He abuses rules and also power if given the chance. He kills. To him, all the world is a sword fight. He resents formal ownership and formal legal qualifications like the West Indian orphan boy(the Oliver Twist) who became the Scrooge; an orphan, murderous boy who was impatient to inherit if it could be him as the beneficiary due to the little proximity he had to Jacob Marley as his adopted liege and employee; underpaid maybe but also unrelated to Marley so how does he take over Marley's home? Marley's family may have been overseas at the time of his demise. Stay home and fight the real war. In any event, we have hopes for the Law Society of Ontario in general. The report you see here involves some of the problems with racializing but also with hunger in Ontario and with insufficient training among those who wish to be involved in the provision of legal services. it provides enough evidence that every member at any time or employee of the Society should receive compensation tantamount to a class action law suit. The Society was just wrong. Warren has several business names he would like to use in the provision of legal services and is now. Would you like to buy Angel Ronan(TM) for $40,000.00 a year to be paid yearly over a 30 year period and he will include work also; whatever legal work you would need to be done? After the scheme was played out in full with Warren successfully exonerated with his licence restored, it seems people were hoping to suggest this was a test of capability; that if he was good enough he would defeat the Law Society in it's fraudulent activity and in the agenda to hand down a fraudulent result if he ever sued them for loss of reputation. Warren could not say he lost any reputation when he was savvy enough to point out that in a Tribunal process based on rules, the Law broke those rules when they brought a witness to a pre hearing settlement discussion and then asked Mr. Lyon with an air of intimidation to continue to discuss the case in front of the Law Society witness thereby prejudicing the case such that no fair hearing was possible. Mr. Lyon realised that they may have intended to kill him for his little house at that time. They apparently tried to move in to his granny's house London. It turns that that Lady Jurrelasic (like Jurassic emotions) who works in Scarborough as a Crown Secretary had a set of prefab materials that she uses to harass fully qualified lawyers when she is really just a lowly Grade 12 illustrious Agincourt Graduate. This brings us to the point that the profession is over represented by unqualified individuals and we could address this by asking how and then also ensuring entry to certain positions is as simple as a basic email confirming interest that lands you a per diem opportunity to work even one day a week; nothing complicated or clandestine in the JW parking lot, the Lodge or the Lutheran Church Kitchen. It was premeditated as she prepared the materials in 2007; as the materials indicated.. prepared on the day of the call to the bar ceremony. The point is that this is emblematic of a culture that is resisting formalities but hiding in the highest echelons of formality to levy its attacks on legal formality; just what a mad, crazy white native would do; all of them ad if the human life threatened in the arena is just unfortunate collateral. The point here is to ask why anyone in this milieux who knew what was happening would dare to ask what was really your passion? My passion is to enjoy a law abiding and peaceful society. I am going to work as Duty Counsel and never really help anyone out of their problems ever again. But if they need help, they can email SDGCK. No reputation was lost when Warren has retained his licence, added to his professional successes by confirming in a thesis that COVID is illegal and by maintaining his consistency in service after seeing the Law Society confirm he remains in good standing. See the letter dated in 2017. You only helped us understand the duplicity of the Ontario legal professiom's regulation. It was an open fraud. First of all, passing the exam once shout jabe been enough. But we were asked to written the exam twice. The first time we got 90%. On the second occasion we got 115%. The sad thing about it is the rabid, vicious, deceitful nature of those involved as representing the Law Society. This was all about a black guy with a Firm and who still has a Firm and who has never failed a client. But, that was pretty vicious; what they did. We are thankful for the Law Society's own report and investigation on racialism that works as a confession on the matter as to the abuse of rules and the process of professional administration in a manner that was unfair, biased, fraudulent and targeting those of racialised communities. All affected will be recieving $70000.00 in compensation, a refund of all members fees paid as suggested in addition to the Law Society's acknowledgement of the problem; not an apology and also a full and final release. The one thing we learned from this is the way in which black people could join in the bandwagon as much as they know what is really happening to steal the firm name, to steal the honor of a Court Application or motion win and pose in the experience of the firm while working to exclude those who did the work. Could that be possible? Would it be possible? We cannot have two sets of professional groups chewing on the same rope but failing to achieve anything constructive before the Court. Those untrained part 5 rule actors need to abide by the same rules of professional conduct when rules of Court are involved or any requests involving Court business and the scheduling of motions. Those who passed the bar exam find that the untrained set of participants do not know the rules and nor do they cooperate with the higher standards of professionalism. What is really going on is just inconvenience for the Court and for those who are trying to serve their clients. Angel Ronan(TM) has proposed a new training scheme that all could participate in even if you are a convict for simple theft under matters but nothing more grievous since you must show some capability for fiduciary duties. Every hopeful member is a fiduciary. It involves ongoing CPD training for everyone and; With respect to practice in Canada, All English Law graduates from the UK, Europe and Ireland will be exempt from any accreditation. However, they will have to participate, like all others, in a 10 year licensing program THAT INVOLVES THE CPD PROGRAM ONLY and cannot practice entirely on their own for the first two years of the program but THEY CAN PRACTICE ON THEIR OWN after the second year. They can join paid or unpaid traineeships. Existing BCL Common Law graduates from any Common Law country in the world are exempt and will be granted a license upon approaching the regulatory body for the requisite membership but they will have to take on going cpd (continuing professional development) in the same programs taken by everyone else every year that will involve courses in the 3rd year of the CPD program and above as mandatory but they can take the 1st and 2nd year courses if they wish as recommended. The program has 10 levels and each CPD year constitutes a level. You must attend every year while you are a member. This is so for everyone and sometimes there will be people in your program or course who are just new arrivals and who have never had multiple public Court achievements like Warren. The best is the investigative appeal at the Court of Appeal when the client was served with a claim as if she was the buyer of the property but she was really the owner and then she was served with a default judgement claiming that she never paid her loan on the property just days after she got the claim; a white lady. She was trying to explain this to the Court and was not heard at the default judgement hearing. She tried to set a Motion date to set aside the default judgement and this would not have been a problem in the usual course since there is evidence that she was not properly, duly served with the claim and also she is self represented. There is also evidence that on the face of it, the claim is fraudulent and the Court cannot be used to aid and abet frauds. She has a case that, in the interests of justice, is best to be dealt with either at trial or under a full hearing of the facts alleged. She was the owner. Our effort was to remind the Court that a scheduling Court is not a Court properly constructed to make any rulings as to the facts and Res Judicata could not come into play here over a Default Judgement. None of the facts had been heard yet.; whether it was the trial scheduling Court or the decision of the Judge who dealt with the default judgement. But, a hungry jurisdiction where people who do not receive sufficient income support is an unusual jurisdiction with lots of huckster snake oil salesman things going on as if you have to act like you need to hurt someone and commit a crime to eat. I would prefer Law in Boston or Chicago Illinois where all citizens receive an income support of no less than $30,000.00 in Chicago Illinois or $50,000.00 in Boston, Mass. We see that in Canada, there is a harmonized sales tax and a gas tax but it is not getting back to all of us in equal quantities after we pay this money to the government. Some of us are getting $30,000.00 pcy Some get $50,000.00 pcy and some get more than this, $38,000.00 in Québec and $90,000.00 in the Yukon or the NWT. Some get nothing. This is benefit inequality and there are cases that outline this as a problem like Egan or Griggs. See Egan and Nesbit v. Canada, 2 Thibaudeau v. Canada (M.N.R.), 3 and Miron v. Trudel.4. See also Fraser v Canada and Griggs v. Duke Power. Frazer and Griggs confirm that all discrimination in policy is illegal; not just in the employment context. See also the 14th amendment. The Equal Protection Clause is part of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." It mandates that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the law.[1][2][3] A primary motivation for this clause was to validate the equality provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed that all citizens would have the guaranteed right to equal protection by law. As a whole, the Fourteenth Amendment marked a large shift in American constitutionalism, by applying substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/migrated/pmb/eeo/directives/upload/Civil-Rights-Directive-2011-01CProcedures-11_5_2010-wk.pdf The Equality Act 2010 safeguards against inequality in the UK and also Canada. See also the case of ; See also indirect discrimination in indirect discrimination is wrong as per Essop in the provision of Government services. The Act is directly applicable in Canada based on the BNA 1867. See also S.15 of the Charter as to benefits and services. The Charter does not apply Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) [2017] UKSC 27 confirms that only to the Territories but to all citizens across the country. Maybe you are too busy being happy with money to actually need to make money as Counsel but if someone needs help and they call you, you might take the whole file; maybe one file a year. But in places like Nigaronto in Nigatario, you need the file to eat and to pay the car payment and you try to keep the file open forever; milking it to just get by and its lousy. Illegally, you are not getting any benefit. What type of lawyers are there in Ontario in the majority if they count not demand the regularising of the benefit to the current standard national expected level of $90,000.00 per year. Maybe you process faster and there will be another file I suppose and you are not too busy so you can say yes more often as to help someone. The Judge who gets the file after( AFTER...) the motion date is set in trial scheduling Court will have all the facts before him to decide if the matter is Res Judicata. Now, this could not have happened before in that woman's file because she had only attended a default judgment proceeding and the facts were never really dealt with in that proceeding. To say "Res judicata" was not only inappropriate in any hearing with only a default judgment on the table, its fraudulent really and is not a finding that a Trial Scheduling Court could make. Res Judicata after a Default Judgement is a finding that one cannot make. Default Judgement that are open to be set aside in the regular course only state that a response to the statement of claim as in a basic statement of defence was not filed. In her case, it was to be set aside since there was no service of the claim and no affidavit. Simply put a Motion and Trial Scheduling Court Judge is not in a forum to make a finding as to Res Judicata even if she has the whole file in front of her. She did not. We have not heard anything as to the facts where we could say, on the facts, that there is nothing new to the file with the matter already decided. We have never really opened the file. The woman has not had a chance to properly respond to the claim and have it dismissed as a fraud on the face of it with no case to answer. These CPD programs will be offered by universities also. Because of the evident genome backwardness and ongoing aboriginal resistance that is camouflaged by designer clothing, make up, nice watches, and good colognes, the programs will be free. Those who sign up and who do not have a law degree can take on a paralegal qualification with limited practice and obtain their full qualification as a five year participant. You can begin the program in Grade 10 following completion of your first Driver's Licence exam even if you failed. This is good. There will be a 15 year program if you would like a full Licence to practice law. You can also become a Judge eventually. The Law Society will issue fines after hearings for any complaints if there is evidence to corroborate the wrong but due to the abuse of the current tribunal processes with no evidence and with false affidavits along with violent attacks and abuses in attempts to steal business names, a fine will be the only penalty and potential criminal prosecution for any theft of client funds or any other activities if criminal in nature. Membership is free but you are encouraged to make donations and you will receive honorable mention for doing so. Errors and Omissions Insurance is free also. Warren's files need to be returned.^^ He also needs his Kung Fu certificate returned. Warren just wants to get his own brand of powdered, sugarless drink on the shelf that will have special properties. He has no desire to be involved in politics but believes we can conspire to be happy with a Canadian income support of no less than $80,000.00 per Canadian pcy with a 2 % yearly increase. There is a future and we can conspire to make the future happy and internationally normal with not only airports designed and renovated to international standards but the income support also must be updated accordingly to international standards, remunerating all citizens. The system, its Monarch and its heirs are legitimate and we show obeisance, hoping just to be a happy citizen. ////// LAW SOCIETY ADOPTS RECOMMENDATIONS TO ADDRESS CHALLENGES FACED BY RACIALIZED LICENSEES 06 décembre 2016 Partager At Convocation on December 2, 2016, the Law Society adopted the Final Report of the Challenges Faced by Racialized Licensees Working Group, entitled "Working Together for Change: Strategies to Address Issues of Systemic Racism in the Legal Professions – November 2016." The Report contains 13 recommendations related to five themes: accelerating a culture shift, measuring progress, educating for change, implementing supports, and leading by example. The Law Society Working Group on this issue was formed in 2012 to identify the challenges faced by racialized lawyers and paralegals and consider strategies for enhanced inclusion at all career stages. The OBA provided a submission on the Working Group’s previous report, a 2014 Consultation Paper. Subsequently, the Working Group released their Final Report, concluding that the challenges faced by racialized licensees are both longstanding and significant, that the Law Society must take a leadership role in bringing about lasting culture change, and that prescribing minimum standards of equality, diversity and inclusion are consistent with human rights responsibilities of the profession that are already in place. The issue is that the Law Society failed to do this and the impact was the use of the Society to propagate a racialised administration and use of criminally abusive, illegal meles in the targeted use of fraudulent investigative processes that was not within any right of law or legal power for the Society to use; not within the genuine Law Society Act that was given assent and nor did the powers claimed appear in a printing of Hansard. It was a fraudulent noose Act, appearing only on the internet at the behest of the criminal assailants and used to attack and essentially defrock those with full formal legal qualifications; some black, some Chinese or Asian and some White but the black were more likely to suffer this abuse. This would be a violation of S.7 of the Charter in addition various criminal laws. Compensation is due and we will receive it without application to the Court. The victims are known and will be compensated. These reports on racialism confirm that S.7 was breached in terms of the right to be alive and security of the person and is an admission.