Posts
Angel Ronan™: We support "Human lives matter" with purpose, celebrating talent and the Kiwanis Club
Here is a movie treatment based on Warren A. Lyon's visionary NOAH space station design, blending hard sci-fi engineering with an everyday, slice-of-life narrative. ## Title Concept: *The NOAH Project* **Logline:** In 2025, the world's first commercial, working-class space station is assembled in orbit. But when a mundane household item threatens to turn the multi-billion-dollar floating city into a mothballed hazard, a diverse crew of maintenance workers, legal officers, and everyday citizens must save their new home. ### Act I: The Booster-less Ascent The film opens in the year 2025, completely redefining how audiences view space travel. We bypass the traditional, fiery booster rocket launches. Instead, we witness the launch of the NOAH's central core—a massive, 50-70 meter capsule echoing the blunt-ended, conical shape of the classic Apollo Command Module. The launch is revolutionary: the top and bottom halves of the central capsule launch from Earth independently, utilizing advanced fuel cells and small retro rockets. In a tense, silent, and beautifully choreographed orbital ballet, the two halves dock and lock together in Low Earth Orbit. Once the core is active, the "brood" arrives. Nine smaller 10-15 meter capsules—miniature Apollo-style shuttles—ascend and connect to the NOAH’s equatorial docking ring. The power systems boot up, pulling energy from advanced solar arrays woven directly into the ship's outer skin, while the hydrogen fuel cells (powered by recycled human waste) begin providing life support. The NOAH is officially open for business. ### Act II: The Orbital Neighborhood Space is no longer strictly the domain of military test pilots and billionaires. The second act explores the democratization of the NOAH. The crew is a deeply diverse, international mix of Africans, Americans, Europeans, Asians, and Russians. Click here.
Here is a movie treatment based on Warren A. Lyon's visionary NOAH space station design, blending hard sci-fi engineering with an everyday, slice-of-life narrative. ## Title Concept: *The NOAH Project* **Logline:** In 2025, the world's first commercial, working-class space station is assembled in orbit. But when a mundane household item threatens to turn the multi-billion-dollar floating city into a mothballed hazard, a diverse crew of maintenance workers, legal officers, and everyday citizens must save their new home. ### Act I: The Booster-less Ascent The film opens in the year 2025, completely redefining how audiences view space travel. We bypass the traditional, fiery booster rocket launches. Instead, we witness the launch of the NOAH's central core—a massive, 50-70 meter capsule echoing the blunt-ended, conical shape of the classic Apollo Command Module. The launch is revolutionary: the top and bottom halves of the central capsule launch from Earth independently, utilizing advanced fuel cells and small retro rockets. In a tense, silent, and beautifully choreographed orbital ballet, the two halves dock and lock together in Low Earth Orbit. Once the core is active, the "brood" arrives. Nine smaller 10-15 meter capsules—miniature Apollo-style shuttles—ascend and connect to the NOAH’s equatorial docking ring. The power systems boot up, pulling energy from advanced solar arrays woven directly into the ship's outer skin, while the hydrogen fuel cells (powered by recycled human waste) begin providing life support. The NOAH is officially open for business. ### Act II: The Orbital Neighborhood Space is no longer strictly the domain of military test pilots and billionaires. The second act explores the democratization of the NOAH. The crew is a deeply diverse, international mix of Africans, Americans, Europeans, Asians, and Russians. Click here.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The Law Society. Click here for more. It is suggested by many in its celebrated closing and passing that The Law Society of Upper Canada was founded by the wrongly motivated and was run by the wrongly motivated or it was taken over by the wrongly motivated when the good men went to war to fight for our freedoms abroad. The Law Society was cob webbed with a Scrooge type Creole anthropology that did not really go to school but was determined to show you what he could do; did not own property but believed he had a right to occupy property belonging to others.; attempting to steal the said property. He says he does not believe in rules but in friendship. He abuses rules and also power if given the chance. He kills. To him, all the world is a sword fight. He resents formal ownership and formal legal qualifications like the West Indian orphan boy(the Oliver Twist) who became the Scrooge; an orphan, murderous boy who was impatient to inherit if it could be him as the beneficiary due to the little proximity he had to Jacob Marley as his adopted liege and employee; underpaid maybe but also unrelated to Marley so how does he take over Marley's home? Marley's family may have been overseas at the time of his demise. Stay home and fight the real war. In any event, we have hopes for the Law Society of Ontario in general. The report you see here involves some of the problems with racializing but also with hunger in Ontario and with insufficient training among those who wish to be involved in the provision of legal services. It provides enough evidence that every member at any time or employee of the Society should receive compensation tantamount to a class action law suit settlement. This is how we settle it. Read the following: It is not really the Law Society but a culture of aboriginality within that society and the Courts also. Could a White young lawyer named Kenneth Goldsmith Cider suffer and attack on his life and licence in the 80's that made him think of just abandoning the profession? He left Canada all together in fear of his life after being told he was being held in Contempt of Court and has to show cause as to why he should not be held in contempt but the lady on the bench was not a sworn in Judge or Court officer. She was not even a real employee in the building but was paid for her time with a cheque made out to cash. So, then she has no power now or then to represent the Queen or King in right of Canada or issue any orders of any kind; and as much as this a celebration of our formalities with a smidgeon of informality in a worshipful recognition of our aboriginality, we see that we are all held random and at risk of being abused in this pirate Court and she will be arrested today and given a s.810 peace bond for 40 years and a restraining order not to attend Court unless summoned to address her own private matters since there were many victims; not just lawyers but public citizens that she had no power to sentence. All persons sentenced by her, if not dead, will receive a $30,000.00 pay out as "victims of crime" compensation. Their sentences and charges are withdrawn. Guilty or not, they have paid. Ironically, what she did is murder the careers and life of any young lawyer and there were four white male lawyers and two white female lawyers.
The Law Society. Click here for more. It is suggested by many in its celebrated closing and passing that The Law Society of Upper Canada was founded by the wrongly motivated and was run by the wrongly motivated or it was taken over by the wrongly motivated when the good men went to war to fight for our freedoms abroad. The Law Society was cob webbed with a Scrooge type Creole anthropology that did not really go to school but was determined to show you what he could do; did not own property but believed he had a right to occupy property belonging to others.; attempting to steal the said property. He says he does not believe in rules but in friendship. He abuses rules and also power if given the chance. He kills. To him, all the world is a sword fight. He resents formal ownership and formal legal qualifications like the West Indian orphan boy(the Oliver Twist) who became the Scrooge; an orphan, murderous boy who was impatient to inherit if it could be him as the beneficiary due to the little proximity he had to Jacob Marley as his adopted liege and employee; underpaid maybe but also unrelated to Marley so how does he take over Marley's home? Marley's family may have been overseas at the time of his demise. Stay home and fight the real war. In any event, we have hopes for the Law Society of Ontario in general. The report you see here involves some of the problems with racializing but also with hunger in Ontario and with insufficient training among those who wish to be involved in the provision of legal services. It provides enough evidence that every member at any time or employee of the Society should receive compensation tantamount to a class action law suit settlement. This is how we settle it. Read the following: It is not really the Law Society but a culture of aboriginality within that society and the Courts also. Could a White young lawyer named Kenneth Goldsmith Cider suffer and attack on his life and licence in the 80's that made him think of just abandoning the profession? He left Canada all together in fear of his life after being told he was being held in Contempt of Court and has to show cause as to why he should not be held in contempt but the lady on the bench was not a sworn in Judge or Court officer. She was not even a real employee in the building but was paid for her time with a cheque made out to cash. So, then she has no power now or then to represent the Queen or King in right of Canada or issue any orders of any kind; and as much as this a celebration of our formalities with a smidgeon of informality in a worshipful recognition of our aboriginality, we see that we are all held random and at risk of being abused in this pirate Court and she will be arrested today and given a s.810 peace bond for 40 years and a restraining order not to attend Court unless summoned to address her own private matters since there were many victims; not just lawyers but public citizens that she had no power to sentence. All persons sentenced by her, if not dead, will receive a $30,000.00 pay out as "victims of crime" compensation. Their sentences and charges are withdrawn. Guilty or not, they have paid. Ironically, what she did is murder the careers and life of any young lawyer and there were four white male lawyers and two white female lawyers.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Very professional, efficient and on time. I'm a white Cherokee. We can have someone from among us give us the answer; Angel Ronan(TM).
Very professional, efficient and on time. I'm a white Cherokee. We can have someone from among us give us the answer; Angel Ronan(TM).
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The Slag in the Mortar The sea off the coast of 1665 Jamaica was thick with English wood and English iron. Red Cross flags snapped in the Caribbean breeze, pushing through the wake of a retreating Spanish shadow. Standing on the Palisadoes, draped in salt-stained velvet and speaking with the heavy, rhythmic cadence of the island’s Creole, stood Columbus. He was ancient, unaging, and unyielding. As the English cannons boomed to claim the shore, he adjusted his cuffs and spoke into the wind, his voice echoing across centuries. "I’ll be you… since Jamaica is always Spain forever. And if not? I will regain my Babylonian ancestral ways. I will pilot your country to a total negation—until you exist as a people in name only. I will be the slag in your mortar." I will make a slag phone own day that will drug all of you and make you soft and angry until you are fighting in the streets for a Spanish economy that feeds all. How can you say no to me or my red headed daughter that will turn it all upside down in your major population centres until you call Cristobal and then all will be well again. No more slag; or you will have the "Will" to fix it yourself. Now once there is video or film, Columbus could say "Now, I see you and if you don't just agree with the Spanish, follow the Spanish you will become soo frustrated that you will say WAR IS GOOD for your Civic health.. because Columbus told you to say that and then you and your best who did not just figure it out are dead and who are we if not Spanish since you can't just do it any old way. You have to follow Spain. Follow or else you feel cantankerous, out of order......de lo contrario te sientes malhumorado, fuera de lugar." CLICK here for more.
The Slag in the Mortar The sea off the coast of 1665 Jamaica was thick with English wood and English iron. Red Cross flags snapped in the Caribbean breeze, pushing through the wake of a retreating Spanish shadow. Standing on the Palisadoes, draped in salt-stained velvet and speaking with the heavy, rhythmic cadence of the island’s Creole, stood Columbus. He was ancient, unaging, and unyielding. As the English cannons boomed to claim the shore, he adjusted his cuffs and spoke into the wind, his voice echoing across centuries. "I’ll be you… since Jamaica is always Spain forever. And if not? I will regain my Babylonian ancestral ways. I will pilot your country to a total negation—until you exist as a people in name only. I will be the slag in your mortar." I will make a slag phone own day that will drug all of you and make you soft and angry until you are fighting in the streets for a Spanish economy that feeds all. How can you say no to me or my red headed daughter that will turn it all upside down in your major population centres until you call Cristobal and then all will be well again. No more slag; or you will have the "Will" to fix it yourself. Now once there is video or film, Columbus could say "Now, I see you and if you don't just agree with the Spanish, follow the Spanish you will become soo frustrated that you will say WAR IS GOOD for your Civic health.. because Columbus told you to say that and then you and your best who did not just figure it out are dead and who are we if not Spanish since you can't just do it any old way. You have to follow Spain. Follow or else you feel cantankerous, out of order......de lo contrario te sientes malhumorado, fuera de lugar." CLICK here for more.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Click here. The Woman at the Well and the Proverbs 31 Woman. July 15th 2026. The Hijab wins. The Hijab is really about the purpose; the purpose of the woman in the civilisations. She builds by having and formally naming the baby. Then we feed the baby and then bring the baby to the teaching. We need a woman, a chick with this rhythm; strictly rhythm. Otherwise, she's strange and we don't like it. This makes her an undercover Puritan or a secular Hijab. We are all Space Ship attendants. By Natalie Shouldnow, Missy Peart, Tina Gackleman, Santo Madre; Odaleen Brown. There are female characters in the bible. How does the woman at the well with Jesus contrast with the Proverbs 31 woman? The one in chapter 31 has just the one husband who is hers. The other has had five and the one she is currently with is not her own. Maybe she was busy being a surrogate mother. The woman, Bush woman or not, is not a weapon against civilization. She has a purpose as designated. The car or vehicle is not a weapon but it could be used this way. The car has a purpose. She names ten children as written in her note book and cover the next ten years, she works her plan and has one baby a year; if there is a...then there are ovaries and a womb. Maybe with the woman at the well, there was something aboriginal going on with her on the outskirts of Egypt and just outside of settled Jerusalem? Her descendants are Muslims probably now. If Jacob used the well, where was he with that woman really or where was that well? The answer is that if it was Jacob's well, they were not far from Egypt and not far from where Joseph was abandoned by his family. The "weak willed woman" in some part of the new testament is different from this woman and aboriginality at the well or is it that she is afraid when you threatened to change something in her life when you are, in her mind, the closer to the official. No one shall take advantage. Her aboriginality with 5 former husbands and the man she was with in adulterous association may just have been her determined, fractious resistance of marital formality, expressing aboriginality; not a witch really with knowledge of the truth but aboriginal bitter, rebellious in a work to be controlling and often deceitful as to whether she stole that water from that Well. Otherwise, she may not name her children. She is not sure that Yoda and Jesus are synonymous but she believes in the Power that brings her man and family back from the fishing excursion; as consistent with her prayers. As your Cheddar Moor Berber, your Mohican Moor Berber, she is working it out. But she has enough money to pay for the groceries and must pay. She wants her brother or father to get back from the fishing. It's therefore a sin to her to sabotage the boat, sabotage the economy or for anyone to covet the catch of fish or the plantation where they scale them since she said that for 500 years or more it belongs to her people, "..it's mine"; she said and you cannot just sit here and clean my pool and use it without payment. She is hard to figure out in the modern era as the Pocahontas of Syracuse with area code 315, wearing her Chanel cologne and the sell offs from House of Frazer or the brand new gear from JC Penney. No body wants anything from her except to build a baby stroller with her for the baby coming out of....! She might be fighting, as the native, your ways; your Leviticus with the formal union of man and woman. She is not really fighting God but your civilization but civilisation is God's business. Every woman is a Mary. We have to help them have a baby. Click here.
Click here. The Woman at the Well and the Proverbs 31 Woman. July 15th 2026. The Hijab wins. The Hijab is really about the purpose; the purpose of the woman in the civilisations. She builds by having and formally naming the baby. Then we feed the baby and then bring the baby to the teaching. We need a woman, a chick with this rhythm; strictly rhythm. Otherwise, she's strange and we don't like it. This makes her an undercover Puritan or a secular Hijab. We are all Space Ship attendants. By Natalie Shouldnow, Missy Peart, Tina Gackleman, Santo Madre; Odaleen Brown. There are female characters in the bible. How does the woman at the well with Jesus contrast with the Proverbs 31 woman? The one in chapter 31 has just the one husband who is hers. The other has had five and the one she is currently with is not her own. Maybe she was busy being a surrogate mother. The woman, Bush woman or not, is not a weapon against civilization. She has a purpose as designated. The car or vehicle is not a weapon but it could be used this way. The car has a purpose. She names ten children as written in her note book and cover the next ten years, she works her plan and has one baby a year; if there is a...then there are ovaries and a womb. Maybe with the woman at the well, there was something aboriginal going on with her on the outskirts of Egypt and just outside of settled Jerusalem? Her descendants are Muslims probably now. If Jacob used the well, where was he with that woman really or where was that well? The answer is that if it was Jacob's well, they were not far from Egypt and not far from where Joseph was abandoned by his family. The "weak willed woman" in some part of the new testament is different from this woman and aboriginality at the well or is it that she is afraid when you threatened to change something in her life when you are, in her mind, the closer to the official. No one shall take advantage. Her aboriginality with 5 former husbands and the man she was with in adulterous association may just have been her determined, fractious resistance of marital formality, expressing aboriginality; not a witch really with knowledge of the truth but aboriginal bitter, rebellious in a work to be controlling and often deceitful as to whether she stole that water from that Well. Otherwise, she may not name her children. She is not sure that Yoda and Jesus are synonymous but she believes in the Power that brings her man and family back from the fishing excursion; as consistent with her prayers. As your Cheddar Moor Berber, your Mohican Moor Berber, she is working it out. But she has enough money to pay for the groceries and must pay. She wants her brother or father to get back from the fishing. It's therefore a sin to her to sabotage the boat, sabotage the economy or for anyone to covet the catch of fish or the plantation where they scale them since she said that for 500 years or more it belongs to her people, "..it's mine"; she said and you cannot just sit here and clean my pool and use it without payment. She is hard to figure out in the modern era as the Pocahontas of Syracuse with area code 315, wearing her Chanel cologne and the sell offs from House of Frazer or the brand new gear from JC Penney. No body wants anything from her except to build a baby stroller with her for the baby coming out of....! She might be fighting, as the native, your ways; your Leviticus with the formal union of man and woman. She is not really fighting God but your civilization but civilisation is God's business. Every woman is a Mary. We have to help them have a baby. Click here.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
In April 2026, a woman was initially charged with attempted murder, Section 18 grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent, and driving offenses following a vehicle impact outside a Soho nightclub that critically injured influencer. When she passed away from her injuries six days later, prosecutors upgraded the primary charge to murder. When a victim dies days or weeks after an assault, English criminal law governs charge progression, causation, and the thin skull rule. 1. Upgrading Charges: From Attempted Murder to Murder Upgrading criminal charges following a victim's death depends on two core legal elements: actus reus (the guilty act) and mens rea (the guilty mind). Completion of the Actus Reus: The actus reus of murder is the unlawful killing of a human being under the King's peace. While the victim was alive in critical condition, the murder actus reus was incomplete, restricting the charge to attempted murder or S.18 GBH. Upon her death, the actus reus of homicide was fulfilled. Abolition of the "Year and a Day" Rule: Historically, English common law required a victim to die within a year and a day of the injury for murder charges to apply. The Law Reform (Year and a Day Rule) Act 1996 abolished this restriction. A death six days post-incident falls well within the timeline to establish direct causation. The Mens Rea Threshold: Attempted Murder: Requires proof of a specific intent to kill (R v Whybrow [1951]). Intent to cause serious bodily harm is legally insufficient for an attempted murder charge. Murder: Under English law (R v Vickers [1957]), malice aforethought for murder is satisfied by either: An intent to kill, or An intent to cause grievous bodily harm (GBH / If the prosecution establishes that Carrington intended to cause grievous bodily harm when driving into the victim, that intent legally suffices for murder once death occurs. Click here.
In April 2026, a woman was initially charged with attempted murder, Section 18 grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent, and driving offenses following a vehicle impact outside a Soho nightclub that critically injured influencer. When she passed away from her injuries six days later, prosecutors upgraded the primary charge to murder. When a victim dies days or weeks after an assault, English criminal law governs charge progression, causation, and the thin skull rule. 1. Upgrading Charges: From Attempted Murder to Murder Upgrading criminal charges following a victim's death depends on two core legal elements: actus reus (the guilty act) and mens rea (the guilty mind). Completion of the Actus Reus: The actus reus of murder is the unlawful killing of a human being under the King's peace. While the victim was alive in critical condition, the murder actus reus was incomplete, restricting the charge to attempted murder or S.18 GBH. Upon her death, the actus reus of homicide was fulfilled. Abolition of the "Year and a Day" Rule: Historically, English common law required a victim to die within a year and a day of the injury for murder charges to apply. The Law Reform (Year and a Day Rule) Act 1996 abolished this restriction. A death six days post-incident falls well within the timeline to establish direct causation. The Mens Rea Threshold: Attempted Murder: Requires proof of a specific intent to kill (R v Whybrow [1951]). Intent to cause serious bodily harm is legally insufficient for an attempted murder charge. Murder: Under English law (R v Vickers [1957]), malice aforethought for murder is satisfied by either: An intent to kill, or An intent to cause grievous bodily harm (GBH / If the prosecution establishes that Carrington intended to cause grievous bodily harm when driving into the victim, that intent legally suffices for murder once death occurs. Click here.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps