Posts

Angel Ronan™: We support "Human lives matter" with purpose, celebrating talent and the Kiwanis Club

 

ARSF

The OWO Hotel, London.

The "Sand-to-Hydrogen" Cycle Since sand (SiO_{2}) has already "burned" (oxidized) as much as it can in nature, you have to "un-burn" it first to get energy out later. * Refining (The "Un-burning"): You take the sand and use a massive amount of heat (often from solar furnaces) to strip away the oxygen. This leaves you with Pure Silicon (Si). * The "Fuel": This pure silicon is now a dense, stable energy carrier. Unlike hydrogen gas, which is leaky and hard to store, silicon is just a rock/powder. * The Reaction: When you want hydrogen gas, you simply add water to the silicon. The silicon "wants" its oxygen back so badly that it rips the oxygen atoms out of the H_{2}O molecules. The result? You get pure Hydrogen Gas (H_{2}), a bit of heat, and the sand (SiO_{2}) is returned to its original state, ready to be recycled.

25/03/2026 The Friction of Biological Variation You noted that for some, the expected "vaginal space" or anatomical design for childbirth was not present. In a 17th-century context, this presented a direct conflict with the law: * Legal Fraud: If a partner entered a marriage while aware of a physical condition that prevented consummation or childbirth, it was often classified as fraud. The law viewed this as "passing false merchandise for true," a deception that robbed the other partner (and the community) of the expected fruits of the union; the falling out or Fall Out. * The "Disappointment" as a Legal Cause: The frustration you describe—the collapse of the expectation of what the body should be versus what it is—was essentially the mechanism that triggered these annulment suits. The courts were effectively the "complaint department" for when the biological reality failed to meet the social script. This historical obsession with "verifying" anatomy—to ensure that the "church-going farm boy" received exactly what he was promised—sets a direct path toward the hyper-visual, "technical" culture that emerged in the 20th century. Where the 17th century relied on courts and priests to verify the "functionality" of a partner, modern media like Playboy or the satirical dystopian lens of Fallout reflects a culture that is perpetually anxious about that same "discovery" or "disappointment." While the Fallout creators might not have cited 17th-century agrarian settlement disappointment as their primary source, the theme of "The Great Lie" (the gap between what society promises on the "wedding night" and what the world actually provides) is the core of the show's dark humor. She seems not to have been able to consummate and the show may help to explain why anyone would start a magazine that displays the anatomical realities of marriage consummation so the farm boy heir would not be deceived since he is a farmer. He needs to seed, time and harvest some farm children. But she said she can't and so there was a Fall Out and then he published a magazine to ensure others do not suffer his experience with someone who cannot anatomically fulfil the expectations. The Magazine in America: If there is a magazine full of women pulling their nose hole open, that is kind of strange. But it is also redundant. We need a new overwhelming ministry in TV, movie and magazines that helps men be fathers and women be mothers; watchable by children on the way to that happy moment, full of birthdays, toys and paid actors at the party in cartoon costumes. It sounds like you are weaving together a complex tapestry of historical settlement patterns, gender roles, and the evolution of social expectations leading into modern media like Fallout and Playboy. Click here for more. While the historical reality of North American settlement often focused on nuclear families or large communal labor groups to handle the grueling task of clearing land, your theory touches on the very real "marriage of necessity" that occurred in frontier life.

Click here. The Herod is about the ignorant native in authority who asks too many questions about the law and economy. His or her demeanor is soo slack that even a 10 year old would be shocked by him. If you don't feed the money, how do you make money on them from sales of products? Because of it you start the UN and sue him or his scape goat President for genocide when he can't just react and move his people to pay the benefits when the people are freezing.

Black History at the White House....

Diversity does not mean exclusion of the host population. No souls are left behind. We are not just developing buildings with the sales tax, we are developing people using the sales tax they paid. The people are the priority or else we have what people? In this Ontario, we don't just freeze to death without money like a dog in sub zero temperatures, we build; build people. 13% to 20% sales tax builds all of these new condo buildings that are now 70% empty and it is also to provide $200.00 a day per person. When we provide the money, the properties can then be occupied by the population whose sales tax dollars built the building. We should not act as if it is impossible to do both or we don't know the reason why it has not happened. The buildings are clean and local so the persons that occupy them must also be clean and a good number of them locals. It's amazing that you could have an idea to help the economy and the real estate development industry and then see it manifest; that the industry could get finance from the government for building whole projects with a percentage of public housing to stay afloat during the 1990-1992 recession when the largest builder has claimed bankrupt twice in that period. You were sitting in a real estate office on Victoria Park just south of Steeles when you left a voice mail with your idea for a Treb Journalist who wrote the article about the Tridel bankruptcy. You did this because you thought it would help us and you needed a job or the comfort of that buoyancy in job potentiality. Yet, you ask for your benefits that have not been paid since due in 1985 and that has not happened. The real source of the bankruptcy is the non payment of the benefits, affecting every child who turned 13 years old in Toronto from 1980 to 1992.

Hmm.... A white supremacist listening to Disco with it's desegregating, socialising power. It's hard to figure this out...

They tried to use the Court to hide the fraud against Vandenberg. He who comes to the table of equity must come with clean hands. Warren won. Vandenberg won. She is the owner of the property and still remains the owner. We are concerned about this judgement appearing on Canlii since it is incorrect. We did not appear before the Court in May. Cheek v. Vanden Berg, 2012 ONCA 285 (CanLII) Court of Appeal for Ontario 2012-05-01 | 1 page AI-generated Appeal Practice and procedure Civil procedure — Appeals — Extension of time — Res judicata — Default judgment The Court of Appeal Vandenberg judgement has been updated to ensure no fraud is perpetrated with the assistance of an Appeal Court. Warren A. Lyon is the Barrister and Solicitor on file. The issue with Spence J's judgement is that there is no mortgage to be paid by Vandenberg. She is the owner of the property. Did the Court verify of there was any mortgage registered. So the judgment on March 11, 2011 should not have been a denial. The motion was denied in error by Spence J. on the basis that Ms. Vanden Berg had not moved promptly to set aside the default judgment once she learned about it in October 2010, and in any event, there was no defence on the merits as the mortgages were in default. She says she was self represented and was not sure how to proceed. All Court files are public record. But, you cannot steal them. In this case, "Angel Ronan" was assisting the client in getting a review of an order and nothing further. She was denied a Motion date before a Motions Court scheduling Judge as she sought a date to either appeal or review the order. Why would you deny her a date when you do not know what facts or information she intended to provide to the Court? She probably needed professional assistance but you cannot deny her a date. It is not res judicata. She is providing new facts and information. You can decide if it's Res Judicata after the hearing her new motion.