CLICK HERE. The most respected and adored presidents are the Big Business Presidents like FDR and Truman; not the war time presidents who are always amputees. Eisenhower had a missing finger. FDR had a missing leg. Let's make a billion dollar 1% National US Federal Sales tax deal in a stark, visceral picture of the modern presidency—less an office of systemic solutions and more a theater of grievance; an An essay. 14/July/2026 Wars are good for the civic health of a nation to marshal all our powers of sobriety. It is just that the very best who qualify are called up or accepted...to die. The metaphors of the "dog with a sore thorn paw" perfectly captures a leadership style driven by vindication and personal injury rather than the statesmanship required to actually fix the engine of the country. But this is a critique only of the most difficult Presidents; all of them already passed on. But if the shoe fits, lets see what we can do to solve America today. Let's coordinate the phenomenon of income support money in America. There is some income support but it is not sufficiently (I 94, I 60, I 90, I 95 ) coordinated and consistent like the highway system. But you want us to believe that you are serious, you mean 'business", to be "business like" globally and economically that you are serious about internal security. A lack of sufficient money per citizen causes internal territorial insecurity. It's your first concern before you start displacing your national failures with talk about other nations. As we fumble around to solve this, we see a well dressed, celebrated office of dysfunctionality running around Maryland and Virginia in a big armoured vehicle. But who are you really if you can't start up the economy, make it work? Here is the breakdown of Jamaica under Spanish rule: * **The Name:** When Christopher Columbus claimed the island for Spain in 1494, he officially named it **Santiago** (after Saint James). In older English texts and historical records, this was frequently anglicized to "St. Jago" or "Santa Jago." Despite the Spanish renaming, the indigenous Taíno name for the island—*Xaymaca* (meaning "Land of Wood and Water")—persisted and eventually evolved into the name Jamaica. * **The Timeline:** The transition from Spanish to English rule actually happened a few years prior to 1664. An English expedition led by Admiral William Penn and General Robert Venables captured the island from the Spanish in **1655**. However, Spain did not formally cede the territory to England until the Treaty of Madrid in 1670. * **The Capital:** The Spanish established their capital on the island in 1534 and called it *Santiago de la Vega* (often referred to by the English as St. Jago de la Vega). You might recognize it by its modern name: **Spanish Town**. Has England suffered some poison by this phenomenon if the tea water at the White House is served at Twiddleham, poisoning the mind of the regals so that they might be closer, closer, closer or equal. But when is it that an English Regal seems as stuck as an American President, not progressing, on the matter of national consistent income support and no one can solve it? But England means to win this like the Economy Tourney. It has the physical territory from the Orkneys; all the way to BC and it has maybe all of CUSMA to show what it can do...with a deal that benefits all. Our backs are not being pushed against the most Northern Orkney beaches. The economy and population is humble and expansive with sufficient income support to just take up a condo in the Vancouver or Toronto or Manitoba territory. The Canadians have enough income support not to want to eat us, kill us and they can get their condo too. It is the CR CUSMA deal. But certainly no one goes without or suffers in a lack of money. Bring your Canadian health card to the bank or your English Health card. This is the landscape that is worthy, that reflects the regal. We have no dying lake but a living biosphere full of birds and bees, foxes and rabbits like Prospect Park in Brooklyn that always has bees; so with a weekly additive of Iron sulphate blue salt to ameliorate standard concerns with the whole community flushing and washing themselves into the water. We get a hair cut when drinking water at the moment and we need to keep treating ourselves with Minoxidil that should be only a remedial product but not a living necessity; and a double quantity of additive in problem areas of the Blue salt is necessary where we have seen deliberate contamination. This is how we answer the concerns. This is for a landscape that reflects the Regals, that reflects all of us. Your frustration with this performative "scavenger culture" is valid, and your instinct to look for an economic "umbrella proposal" that directly empowers the working class is the exact logic behind Universal Basic Income (UBI) and demand-side economics. When the working class has capital, they spend it on necessities—diapers, coffee, tires, debt repayment—and business booms. But if we can't agree to this, war is good for the civic health of the nation. You should as white men want to be financially plugged into the world of good opportunities with other white people like maybe a Scandinavian girl you might meet on the Euro Rail. She is 41 and you are 57 from Toronto with no income benefit all these years. Now you got the benefits. You are just who she is looking for; fatherly and you got your benefit now. She has enough benefits money and you have enough benefits money. She will sip your left-over drink on the 3 hour trip and she drinks it for the three hours. She says she will have the baby. She says follow her to the grand marche as you get to Gare du AIMER so you can pay for the baby stroller. You click in conversation and you both decide to do this. But right now you are from New Jersey with $ USD 20,000.00 per year benefits or you are from Toronto with no benefits. But you have a phallicism in all your use of government funds to build new condo units through agreement that a portion of the units are for public housing. What about a niche benefit of $2500.00 per month and this is what they want; they the regal people. However, while your philosophical diagnosis of the political system is sharp, the specific math in your proposal hits a wall when we look at the macroeconomic reality.