Posts

Angel Ronan™: We support "Human lives matter" with purpose, celebrating talent and the Kiwanis Club

A Canadian government service, a Court or Ministry sends a payment to a citizen amounting to $140,000.00 as unpaid salary, spousal and child support or as compensation as a victim of crime. The bank sees the payment come in for credit to the customer's account. They hold the payment or payments. They do not immediately credit the funds to the account. It's in a cue for final review. It's flashing for employee action; that they will credit the funds to the account. A customer service agent gets a call from one of the recipients about a $5.00 fee debited to his account for a withdrawal at a machine. It's kind of high. She accesses his profile and sees the $140000.00 payment pending while answering his questions about the fee. She concludes the call but does not credit the funds to the account. She leaves it pending. She sees the payment has been there for 6 weeks. She is from Kenya with Calcutta Hindu ancestry. Her mother was a manager in a Kenyan Bank and may have been very busy with international transfers. Her mother was tired of feeling intimidated by Foreign Bankers in Canada or the UK or the US, reading their MT 100 swift tracer messages who wanted the funds sent to the Indian bank credited immediately. So she woke up one morning after getting totally fed up with feeling nervous every where she goes to and from work and decided to become a London bank back office employee, working in payment processing or wire tracing. She packed up all her family but she noticed when she got to London the children she gave birth to there shouted at the Tube station manager at Arnos Grove and said "...do do do not not intimidate me me or else I will be the station manager." Anyway, if the wire transfer as a Canada to Canada transfer is sent on April 10th 2026, when must it be paid before it's a deliberate obstruction of government business, a fraud or attempt at fraud and violation of the FICB and CDIC rules?

on
 A Canadian government service, a Court or Ministry sends a payment to a citizen amounting to $140,000.00 as unpaid salary, spousal and child support or as compensation as a victim of crime. The bank sees the payment come in for credit to the customer's account.  They hold the payment or payments. They do not immediately credit the funds to the account. It's in a cue for final review. It's flashing for employee action; that they will credit the funds to the account.  A customer service agent gets a call from one of the recipients about a $5.00 fee debited to his account for a withdrawal at a machine. It's kind of high. She accesses his profile and sees the $140000.00  payment pending while answering his questions about the fee. She concludes the call but does not credit the funds to the account. She leaves it pending. She sees the payment has been there for 6 weeks. She is from Kenya with Calcutta Hindu ancestry. Her mother was a manager in a Kenyan Bank and may have...
0

Legal Argument: Closing with immediate effect as of October 15th, 2026 the Constitutional Lacuna on Criminal Record Disqualifications and also campaign disclosure of the candidates criminal antecedents for Campaigning Individuals or Elected Officials; A Discussion: Under Canadian and UK constitutional and administrative public law, criminals cannot be the King of Queen's representatives; elected or appointed. The legal distinction between appointed state officers (Crown Attorneys, court clerks, members of the armed forces) and elected state officials (Mayors, MPPs, MPs, Premiers) regarding criminal convictions creates an unjustifiable, dangerous legal lacuna. Because elected representatives exercise primary, unmediated state authority—shaping legislation, directing public policy, supervising police/security boards, and accessing sensitive state information—they fulfill a fiduciary function at least equal to, if not exceeding, that of subordinate Crown agents. Therefore, an unpardoned criminal conviction does constitute a complete disqualification from seeking or holding elected public office. Click here. I. The Nature of the Legal Lacuna: Section 750 vs. Section 3 The Canadian legal framework currently exhibits a structural contradiction between Section 750 of the Criminal Code and Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Statutory Boundary (s. 750 Criminal Code): Under Section 750(1), any individual convicted of an indictable offence and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of two years or more automatically forfeits any public office or legislative seat. The Charter Inconsistency (s. 3 Charter): Following cases like Sauvé v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) [2002] 3 S.C.R. 519 and Harvey v. New Brunswick (Attorney General) [1996] 2 S.C.R. 876, courts have interpreted Section 3 broadly to protect the right of citizens to run for office once a prison sentence has expired. They should not be allowed to run at all and this is the only bar to being a candidate although all can seek or run for office except with that singular exception. The Lacuna: This framework creates an arbitrary temporal divide. The law recognizes that a criminal conviction destroys the capacity to exercise state authority while incarcerated, but falsely presumes that upon physical release, the moral and legal capacity to exercise the highest tier of state authority is automatically restored—even without a formal pardon or Record Suspension. If a crime damages public trust sufficiently to strip an individual of office on Day 1 of a sentence, that breach of trust does not magically evaporate on the day of release. The breach of trust is still there. But because the power to write legislation has been abused in creating this lacuna, then the government can place their own individual into the office that was up for election with 2 or more disqualified criminal candidates. CLICK HERE. II. Indistinguishability of Authority: Crown Agents vs. Elected Officials The conventional legal defense of this divide relies on the fiction that elected representatives are merely "legislators" or "political representatives," while soldiers, police officers, court clerks, and Crown Attorneys are "executive agents." This distinction fails on three key legal grounds: 1. Exercise of State Power and Coercive Authority Subordinate agents (court clerks, Crown Prosecutors, military personnel) merely administer or execute laws drafted by elected officials. A Mayor, MPP, or MP exercises primary state authority: Mayors and municipal councils enact binding local by-laws backed by state coercion, fines, and land-use restrictions. MPPs and MPs enact criminal, civil, and regulatory statutes that govern liberty, property, and civil rights. MPs do not carry divine right. Citizens do not carry divine right that can be some how activated if they run for office. This is maybe what the confused thief of the legislature was looking for as he sought the attention of the whole world to also confirm if anyone was paying attention (He asked, "...Are you paying attention or are you busy with your bride.... your wife?") But, it is illegal and any Act that purports that some criminals can be involved in legislation and privy to sensitive Crown information is a fraud. A criminal is not even allowed to represent the Crown or access the building as a Court Security guard, cook or coffee server. In such a scenario, the Crown cam intervene and appoint the Mayor or call on an agent of the Governor General of the province; possibly a Crown Attorney to be the Mayor. It is logically incoherent to demand that the executor of the law be free of an unpardoned criminal record while allowing the creator of that same law to be a convicted criminal or felon. Click here.

on
0

As proposed, the Banks in the UK and Canada are going through some operations updates after being taken over by German Gesellschaft banks. All government payments that include benefits payments will be released without any hold including amounts over £100,000.00 or $ CAD 100,000.00. However if it's a government payment to an individual, there is limited access set at £20,000.00 equivalent per month in the UK or Canada for 48 months. As such you can never spend, transfer or access in the account more than £20000.00 in any given month. Thank you. UK Job Centre and the HMRC. Please prepare a mock Bulletin.

on
0

About the American Southwest—one often summarized by the Chicano movement's famous phrase: **"We didn't cross the border; the border crossed us."** When discussing California's demographics, the catch-all label of "immigrant" is frequently applied to people of Mexican, Indigenous, and Mestizo descent. As you pointed out, applying that label to populations whose ancestral ties to the land predate the United States itself creates a historical contradiction. Here is a breakdown of the history, the timeline, and the shifting definitions of who is considered an "immigrant" in California. ## The Historical Timeline: Indigenous, Spanish, and Mexican Roots While the exact dates of San Diego's founding differ slightly from 1549, your broader point about deep historical roots is absolutely correct: * **Pre-Colonial (10,000+ years ago):** Long before Spanish arrival, the land that is now San Diego was inhabited by the **Kumeyaay** people. The "Amerindian" ancestry you mentioned is indigenous to the Americas, meaning these bloodlines have been tied to the continent for millennia, not centuries Click here. * **Spanish Exploration (1542):** Juan Rodríguez Cabrillo claimed the bay for the Spanish Empire in 1542.

on
0

Talking Heads..

on
0

Beyond Imperial Codes: The UDHR, Public Friction, and the Pluralist State; THE UDHR as the UBER legal policy and code.

on
0

The Uber benefits: The implementation of a total income benefit—a universal baseline paid to citizens and those with the right to work—creates a profound psychological and cultural shift. It transitions a society from a psychology of *survival and scarcity* to one of *baseline security and agency*. To understand this through the lens of political and economic philosophy, we have to look at how a guaranteed income alters the relationship between the individual, the market, and the state. Here is how Machiavelli, Adam Smith, and John Stuart Mill might deconstruct the culture and psychology of such a system. We are all just blessed emotional hamburger really and should not overestimate ourselves. Click here.

on
0

Title: Decentralizing Executive Authority: The Case for a Five-Member Presidential Council Introduction The presidency of the United States, as established under Article II of the U.S. Constitution, vests ultimate executive authority in a single individual. While this design aimed to promote decisive leadership, the vast scale of modern government has severely strained the centralized executive structure. Modern political gridlock, executive overreach, and growing voter alienation signal a pressing need for structural reform. The current President of the United States (POTUS) model should be replaced by a five-member presidential council—comprising one representative for each major geographic region (North, South, East, West, and Central)—to manage domestic and international affairs. Reimagining executive governance through a multi-member council will improve administrative efficiency, reduce wasteful policy inertia, and establish a more representative, responsive government. Click here.

on
0

PHILIPS

on
0

The summer was a turning point for Phillips, with several leaders leaving the auction house, including Miety Heiden, chairman of private sales, and Jonathan Crocket, chairman for Asia. While reporting at the time showed that Phillips was pivoting strategy after a costly attempt to compete with Sotheby’s and Christie’s, a new filing adds some financial figures to the picture. According to the auction house’s 2025 filing with Companies House, the UK government agency that keeps annual records for companies registered in the country, Phillips’s turnover fell 22.3 percent, from $44.13 million (£33.18 million) in 2024 to $34.26 million (£25.76 million) in 2025. Its pre-tax loss, however, narrowed to $14.02 million (£10.54 million), from $61.86 million (£46.51 million) the previous year, when results were weighed down by a one-time, non-cash charge of about $35.9 million (£27 million) tied to the revaluation of balances with other Phillips entities. Gross profit fell 6 percent, to $19.57 million (£14.72 million) from $20.86 million (£15.68 million)

on
0

The good attitude wins the day; This just in: it has been approved as rumoured that all Ontario Post Secondary College programs have adopted a new marking scheme to encourage participation and attendance. All enrolled students will graduate on one condition; that they attended all lectures and classes with any "in class" participation. This will render a PASS or a D at 50% on Attendance only. You must at least attempt all assignments, tests and sit the final exam. You do not have to pass or finish the tests, assignments or exams but you cannot leave the tests unattempted but must show participation. This is for the GED pass program also if you sign up to complete any Arts and Humanities program. In this programme, you will also be granted a GED if you had not completed one previously. To complete the program, it is confirmed that general attendance with some participation is therefore most essential. Tuition rates will be clearly posted online and also in brochures that you can have mailed to you or you can pick them up in person. In addition to that, you demonstrate an attitude that confirms your appreciation for the College and you will always maintain this appreciation. Click here.

on
0

THM question: Total Hotel Management Question. A Hotel in Manchester called the Inglis Budget at Salford quays gets 12 bookings a day on average for four nights per booking and the average night costs £60 a night. What do they earn per day? What do they earn per day on bookings? If they get 70 orders per day on food at £15.00 per day, what do they earn per day on food? If the Vat collection is based on 20% what is the VAT earned per day, per week or per MONTH on all transactions? What is the VAT earned per day of the rate is 49%?

on
0

A fight between owner and trespasser cannot happen. The authorities know who the owner is on sight when he is entering the house with a locksmith to get his ownership document or he has notice by email of his ownership. The trespasser has notice of his crime by email. The trespasser breaks into your house and steals notice of your rightful occupancy. He she does not leave but also he does not abide by the rules and make payments. You do not get notice by email or on your phone. You eventually get notice by other means; one of the illegal occupants. The trespasser or burglar gets notice at his home of his convictions for trespass. You do not have notice by email or on your phone by emergency broadcast. You don't mind if they had paid but they would choose to suffer the consequences of conviction and Court attendance in some kind of Residual Nativism and it's childish since the amount to be paid is simple. They would rather hope the owner dead. This goes on for years. The trespasser or burglar however is better served by the government with information and has an informational advantage; a disclosure advantage. He knows by email notification that he is in trespass to property and that he is under obligation to pay a said individual. Does the individual know that someone owes him and might be looking for him? Can he break onto the house and get his own document of ownership? Since the Court is involved, this offends principles of natural justice like fairness and balance in the process. It offends equity. Please discuss.

on
0

TBWS: The Casio Duro is the kind of purchase that doesn’t require a committee meeting or a spreadsheet to justify. Casio’s official site lists the price at $84.95, though street prices can drop to around $50. Even at its full retail price, there’s a surprising amount of watch here. The stainless steel case has more thoughtful finishing than we’d expect, the unidirectional bezel feels satisfying to operate, and the 200 meters of water resistance gives the Duro genuine everyday versatility. Add the accuracy and convenience of its quartz movement, and it’s difficult to identify many areas where Casio has made compromises that meaningfully detract from the experience.

on
0

The Peasant's Benefit paid to all: The idea that "wagelessness caused by robotic automation is the true socio-economic global pandemic" captures a profound concern shared by economists, sociologists, and public figures. Phrased in the formal, active rhetoric reminiscent of King Charles (and classic British socio-political discourse), it highlights a core issue of modern technological disruption: the threat of technological unemployment and structural inequality.

on
0