Posts

Angel Ronan™: We support "Human lives matter" with purpose, celebrating talent and the Kiwanis Club

The Diggers were sent to penal colonies in the West Indies; at least some of them. While the 17th century was certainly a period of brutal repression, the specific fate of Gerrard Winstanley and his followers was less about overseas exile and more about local harassment and economic exhaustion. Some were exiled or transported to Virginia, Nova Scotia and places like Jamaica. They would usually run to the hills. Some also joined the Quakers in the new world. Apparently Winstanley. What Actually Happened to the Diggers? The Digger movement was short-lived (1649–1650). Instead of being deported, they were systematically dismantled through legal and physical intimidation by local landowners and the government of the New Model Army. Some fled; not deported. There was little point with a law suit against people who were not on the church roles. * Legal Harassment: Landlords brought lawsuits against the Diggers for "trespass." Since the Diggers refused to recognize the authority of the courts (or hire lawyers), they lost by default. * Physical Violence: Local mobs, often encouraged by the gentry, burned the Diggers' huts, destroyed their crops, and beat the participants. * Economic Ruin: By April 1650, after their houses were burned and their tools seized, the community at St. George’s Hill (and later Cobham Heath) simply couldn't sustain itself. They eventually dispersed. Who Was Sent to the West Indies? Your memory might be blending the Diggers with other groups from the same era. During the English Civil War and the subsequent Protectorate under Oliver Cromwell: * Irish Prisoners of War: Thousands of Irish people were forcibly transported to Barbados and Jamaica as indentured servants. * Royalist Soldiers: Captured soldiers from the Battle of Worcester (1651) and other conflicts were often "barbadosed" (the slang of the time for forced labor in the colonies); "barbadosed" or fermented or Vermonted. * The Levellers (Different Group): While the Diggers (True Levellers) were largely ignored by the high courts once their camps were destroyed, the political Levellers—who were more active in the army—faced executions and imprisonment for mutiny. Gerrard Winstanley’s Later Life Rather than ending up as a prisoner, Winstanley may have actually lived a relatively quiet life after the movement collapsed as an escape in the new England colonies when taking over from the Dutch whose methods of brutal assimilation were audited in the newly branded English Caribbean; too many missing fingers, feet and other appendages. In a twist of historical irony, he eventually became a Quaker and served as a corn chandler and even a churchwarden—essentially re-entering the middle-class society he had once radically critiqued. Fun Fact: While they didn't succeed in 1649, the Diggers' ideas survived. Winstanley’s famous quote, "The Earth was made to be a common treasury for all," became a foundational text for modern agrarian socialism and anarchism.

 The Diggers were sent to penal colonies in the West Indies; at least some of them.    While the 17th century was certainly a period of brutal repression, the specific fate of Gerrard Winstanley and his followers was less about overseas exile and more about local harassment and economic exhaustion. Some were exiled or transported to Virginia, Nova Scotia and places like Jamaica. They would usually run to the hills. Some also joined the Quakers in the new world. Apparently Winstanley became eventually a colonial rebel, a replacement for a Hamilton that had arrived as a bright ideaed inspired man with books under his arm from Locke, Rousseau and Hobbes, the West Indies.    What Actually Happened to the Diggers? The Digger movement was short-lived (1649–1650). Instead of being deported, they were systematically dismantled through legal and physical intimidation by local landowners and the government of the New Model Army.  Some fled; not deported.  There ...

The Bible Lady...

The whole Canadian experience is kind of a fraud. We sing and cheer for the sports teams. We spend money for flags and sheets. Pellet dress up and cit their hair really nice and smile for the cameras. All of this happens and then many Canadians are not recieving their benefits. If the MP knew that there is just one Canadian that is not receiving their benefit, we believe he would resolve it the next day so that all the Canadians received their benefits equally or what else is he doing and why? We thank them for their assistance. It’s incredibly frustrating to feel like there is a "performance" of national pride while the basic systems that are supposed to support citizens aren't functioning. When you see the pomp and circumstance of sports or public events, it can feel like a slap in the face if you're struggling to navigate a bureaucracy that feels indifferent to your actual needs. Your frustration with your Member of Parliament (MP) is shared by many. The expectation is that they are your direct line to the government—the person who fixes the "glitch in the machine." Why isn't the MP fixing it "the next day"? While it should be that simple, here is a bit of insight into why these delays happen and what your MP is actually doing: * Jurisdictional Separation: Often, the benefits people are missing are provincial (like ODSP or OHIP) while your MP handles federal issues (like EI, CPP, or CRA). If you contact an MP about a provincial issue, they technically have no power over it, and vice versa for an MPP. * The "Case File" Process: When you bring a problem to an MP, their staff opens a Constituency Case. They have "hotlines" to government agencies, but they are still subject to the same backlogs as everyone else. They can't usually override the law; they can only force a human to actually look at your file. * Policy vs. Individual Fixes: MPs spend their time in Ottawa debating laws (the "big picture"). Unfortunately, this often takes them away from the "small picture"—the individual Canadian who hasn't received a cheque. How to hold them accountable If you or someone you know is being denied benefits, the "smiling for the camera" doesn't help. Here is how you can move past the fluff: * The "In-Person" Squeaky Wheel: Emails are easy to ignore. Calling the constituency office and requesting an in-person meeting with the Caseworker (not just the MP) is often more effective. * The Taxpayer Ombudsman: If the CRA is the issue, there is a specific office (the Office of the Taxpayers’ Ombudsman) designed to handle these failures when the MP route isn't working. * Media and Public Record: Sometimes, reminding an MP that "one Canadian not receiving benefits" is a news story helps speed up their "next day" timeline. It’s valid to feel like the "Canadian experience" is out of sync with reality when the safety net has holes in it. This is not the service we are paying for though as we are believing in the politicians to give life to our expectations of law and compliance with that law. We thank them for their assistance. They are amazing if we can actually see and receive the benefit.

It is understood that the the laws of England are the Laws of Jamaica and Canada.

We advised Game Cater Lines not to pay any false balance owing until she has refiled her taxes. Garth Ramerpor has advised her to go ahead and pay the curry debt based on the erroneous tax return. Otherwise Game Cater Line is a fool and an Ass for letting Fishgyal and Ramapor use her for attention. She did not let me assist her. She did not take my advice to seek a refund from the previous accountant or at least explain to him that the 22 year old property needed repairs which is what the expenses exemplify. As such, she would expect a refund instead of following the CCA method. It looks like Fishgyal is trying to eat her. Nonetheless, we will not let Game Cater Lines be a victim of fraud by David Smith; not Ramapor and Janet Smith whose alias is Akrea Befeld Fishgyal. There is no Garth Ramerpor. This is our report for anyone in a similar situation. Click here. Angel Ronan SHOKUNIN Report 020226: Prepared by Warren A. Lyon. Call us for your 2025 Taxes. Warren can help.

Many of us cannot live a week knowing that you are without ID. You would pay the money the Court order says you are to pay. Think of it as the last payment in your home occupation agreement. The $400,000.00 mortgage is gone. You are a man or a woman. You cannot drive legally. You cannot get health services. You cannot get police assistance. You cannot arrange car insurance for your lease. We have not paid for anyone. No one has asked us to do so. You are something difficult to understand. You say to the order, "...you need to understand that I cannot be under those people, under them." You are Grendel 3.0. Take your time. Just think about good association to who paid your debt instead. Keep that association. You could be an officer or a former officer that has not paid. No one is asking you to pay with your life. You have your favour. Your debt is paid. You, however, can't remain in violation of a Court Order. You have all the authority and power of choice this time. It has nothing to do with your skin; black or white. I am not your first born Leifsland.and you cannot keep violating the restraining order. You are not the ...! Maury Povitsh says you are not the.. Your first born with the Clarks was Peter Phillips, You killed him and then tried to impersonate him at UWI to see how much all his work was worth for that doctorate in 1968. Then, Bob joined the Rastas in shock. Nonetheless, thank you for everything and all the cussing about any C in grade 5, 6 or 7. So you could still choose to be a police officer. Yet you are also a convict for murder and for attempt impersonation. What parking tickets etc do you have to pay to be that police officer or at least a citizen; is it and enjoy your benefits? Is it $30,000.00 worth of tickets? So, pay since you have the money. Otherwise, where is it that you would hide? It's gone. But, we can rebuild.

R. v. Jones, 2017 SCC 60 (CanLII), [2017] 2 SCR 696