Angel Ronan Entwerfen™ Firm; Litigation, Journal, Intellectual Property with the Real George™.

SDGCK Reports: Here is the updated financial model based on 160,000 businesses, an hourly sales rate of £2,000.00 per business, a population of 5,000,000 people, and 365 days per year. The benefit is a basic economic commitment for economic reasons once the impact of wagelessness caused by automation is accepted by producers of consumer goods and the government that pays for the tremendous cost of the social fall out or human health problems caused by the wagelessness that equals moneylessness. The solution is obvious as iterated in the UDHR Article 25. The resistance to this fact in the English economies denies the origins of the English population as Europeans. The resistance and its tendency in the banks to withhold benefits payments from citizens is an non English and foreign phenomenon that has occupied itself handsomely in the UK at the banking operations level for at least two generations after WW2. Its origin seems to be Port Royal; bottles with DNA and written messages in them that women were asked to incubate as children; and they were paid. It may have been seen else where at docks in the north and in the east end of London as some anthropy referred to as blocage. We know we can afford the benefit and we accept it is necessary economically for market utility so that there is money in the market available to consumers to buy the robotically made or machine made goods. If not, everything shuts down no matter how cheaply the goods are made. There are no sales and so then there is no consistent circular, continuous revenue. There is depression and recession, crime and theft. If they cannot buy the goods they have come to rely on, they will steal. They steal and then the jails and Courts are full. This is an interruption of the eternal positive monetary circular movement of the economy where everyone, if it is not interrupted, is in the benefit from their participation in their aspect of economic activity. Maybe they are just a consumer, father and mother of the next potential bus driver or national hockey team members. For this, they receive their participatory remuneration; also known as their basic income support benefit. It might be only 10 pence a minute or it's 20 pence a minute. The amount; if its 20 pence a minute or 30 pence per minute is chosen to ensure that basic daily human dignity can be maintained so that the citizen has sufficient monies daily to maintain themselves. They are not suffering due to a lack of money. They are self maintaining and cost less to the purse than the time it takes to process applications and assist people who are denied for unusual administrative reasons. 20 pence a minute is £ 288 per day in benefits and 30 pence is £432 per day in benefits. This is then made available through a special debit electronic currency card; a UK NHS card or the Canada Benefit Card. The small fraction of money paid per minute is like the fraction of energy we pay into the machines per minute or per hour; much like a kilowatt per minute or per hour. The problematic anthropy issue in the UK and Canada is when the money is often paid by the government to the citizen for lottery winnings or benefits but the citizen has not received it. This is because the bank employee, with no criminal record as a High School or University graduate has chosen not to deposit the funds to the recipient's account. They eventually lose their jobs. But how did anyone with this weirdo anthropology get a Bank job? This happens again and again as a weird expression of anthropology and a criminal offence; obstruction of government business. This is troubling to people who hope to enjoy an economy that is automatic and perpetual; worthy of a Crown in its function and evident working. IBM and other similar corporations consist of technical solutions to elevate human facility and reduce work process redundancies to assist their Government and Banking corporate clients with STP; straight through processing. We can see the ID of the employee or employees who have failed to ensure the payment is applied to the client account. In taking two employees every day until the problem is resolved, wbo is the customer service representative? Who is the manager responsible since we can't pay people not to do their jobs? Written by SDGCK Research with Angel Ronin Shokunin. Baseline Figures & Revenue Confirmation Total Businesses: 160,000 Hourly Revenue per Business: £2,000.00 Hours per Year: 365 \text{ days} \times 24 \text{ hours} = 8,760 \text{ hours} Minutes per Year: 8,760 \text{ hours} \times 60 \text{ minutes} = 525,600 \text{ minutes} Population: 5,000,000 Total Gross Revenue Calculation \text{Gross Revenue} = 160,000 \times £2,000 \times 8,760 = £2,803,200,000,000 \quad (£2.8032 \text{ trillion}) Confirmed Tax Revenue per Year Scenario 1 (20% VAT): £2,803,200,000,000 \times 0.20 = \mathbf{£560,640,000,000} \quad (£560.64 \text{ billion}) Scenario 2 (39% Sales Tax): £2,803,200,000,000 \times 0.39 = \mathbf{£1,093,248,000,000} \quad (£1.0932 \text{ trillion}) Scenario 1: 20% VAT & 20 Pence per Minute Benefits 1. Benefit Payout Breakdown (20p/min per person) Annual Benefit per Person: £0.20 \times 525,600 \text{ minutes} = £105,120 Total Yearly Benefit Payout (5M Population): 5,000,000 \times £105,120 = \mathbf{£525,600,000,000} \quad (£525.6 \text{ billion}) Monthly Benefit Payout: \frac{£525,600,000,000}{12} = \mathbf{£43,800,000,000} \quad (£43.8 \text{ billion}) Daily Benefit Payout: \frac{£525,600,000,000}{365} = \mathbf{£1,440,000,000} \quad (£1.44 \text{ billion}) 2. Net Balance \text{VAT Revenue} - \text{Total Annual Benefits} = £560.64 \text{ billion} - £525.60 \text{ billion} = \mathbf{+£35,040,000,000} (A surplus of £35.04 billion) CLICK HERE.

Legal Argument: Closing the Constitutional Lacuna on Criminal Record Disqualifications for Elected Officials Thesis: Under Canadian constitutional and administrative public law, the legal distinction between appointed state officers (Crown Attorneys, court clerks, members of the armed forces) and elected state officials (Mayors, MPPs, MPs, Premiers) regarding criminal convictions creates an unjustifiable, dangerous legal lacuna. Because elected representatives exercise primary, unmediated state authority—shaping legislation, directing public policy, supervising police/security boards, and accessing sensitive state information—they fulfill a fiduciary function at least equal to, if not exceeding, that of subordinate Crown agents. Therefore, an unpardoned criminal conviction should constitute a complete disqualification from seeking or holding elected public office. Click here. I. The Nature of the Legal Lacuna: Section 750 vs. Section 3 The Canadian legal framework currently exhibits a structural contradiction between Section 750 of the Criminal Code and Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: The Statutory Boundary (s. 750 Criminal Code): Under Section 750(1), any individual convicted of an indictable offence and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of two years or more automatically forfeits any public office or legislative seat. The Charter Inconsistency (s. 3 Charter): Following cases like Sauvé v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) [2002] 3 S.C.R. 519 and Harvey v. New Brunswick (Attorney General) [1996] 2 S.C.R. 876, courts have interpreted Section 3 broadly to protect the right of citizens to run for office once a prison sentence has expired. They should not be allowed to run at all and this is the only bar to being a candidate although all can seek or run for office except with that singular exception. The Lacuna: This framework creates an arbitrary temporal divide. The law recognizes that a criminal conviction destroys the capacity to exercise state authority while incarcerated, but falsely presumes that upon physical release, the moral and legal capacity to exercise the highest tier of state authority is automatically restored—even without a formal pardon or Record Suspension. If a crime damages public trust sufficiently to strip an individual of office on Day 1 of a sentence, that breach of trust does not magically evaporate on the day of release unless formally addressed through clemency channels. II. Indistinguishability of Authority: Crown Agents vs. Elected Officials The conventional legal defense of this divide relies on the fiction that elected representatives are merely "legislators" or "political representatives," while soldiers, police officers, court clerks, and Crown Attorneys are "executive agents." This distinction fails on three key legal grounds: 1. Exercise of State Power and Coercive Authority Subordinate agents (court clerks, Crown Prosecutors, military personnel) merely administer or execute laws drafted by elected officials. A Mayor, MPP, or MP exercises primary state authority: Mayors and municipal councils enact binding local by-laws backed by state coercion, fines, and land-use restrictions. MPPs and MPs enact criminal, civil, and regulatory statutes that govern liberty, property, and civil rights. MPs do not carry divine right. Citizens do not carry divine right that can be some how activated if they run for office. This is maybe what the confused thief of the legislature was looking for as he sought the attention of the whole world to also confirm if anyone was paying attention (He asked, "...Are you paying attention or are you busy with your bride.... your wife?") But, it is illegal and any Act that proports that some criminals can be involved in legislation and privy to sensitive Crown information is a fraud. A criminal is not even allowed to represent the Crown or access the building as a Court Security guard, cook or coffee server. It is logically incoherent to demand that the executor of the law be free of an unpardoned criminal record while allowing the creator of that same law to be a convicted felon. 2. Access to Confidential and Security-Sensitive Information Elected leaders—Mayors on local Police Services Boards, Cabinet Ministers, Prime Ministers, and Parliamentarians—regularly receive high-level state intelligence, Cabinet documents, and sensitive law enforcement data. Requiring a lower-level court clerk or soldier to undergo rigorous background screening to handle sensitive documents while granting an unscreened, convicted politician access to state secrets undermines national and municipal security frameworks. Click here.

You missed your human moment. The unpaid benefits or the insufficient benefit is the Capitol Building Identity Crisis. October 14th, 2026. By SDGCK Reports with Warren A. Lyon, University of London Alumni and Researcher. But if 500 people took the Capitol Building in 1978, what would happen? Wouldn't it be that everyone gets their unconditional income support benefit? If 500 people (white skin, yellow skin, black skin, red skin) took the Capitol Building and all the positions across the country, wouldn't it be that we get our income support benefits maybe at $90,000.00 per year? This has not happened. We see instead benefits blackouts in whole regions like Toronto, Kingston, Peel, Guelph, and Orangeville. This is a problem. People have been hurting for the last 40 years. Money still has currency for identity. While we spend it electronically, there is the currency in which it is received or deposited into the account, such as the Yen or the Rupee for example. Then there is economic circulation through bank account debit cards or credit cards in currencies such as British Pounds, US Dollars, or Australian Dollars. The question too often is if people have any money of any kind and how much; if it's enough to survive the cold in their own country, in the great North. In many cases, unlike the Japanese or the Indians, they do not have with the same certainty the money that takes on less physical form in the current era and becomes a more ethereal, electronic phenomenon. Moneylessness due to automation is in reality Wagelessness: Written by Mister Die Stunde Ist-Vorbei with John Wise Trumpet with Real Economist News. Click here.

Pick Another protein.

Goal.......!!! Graduation.....!!!

You missed your human moment. The unpaid benefits or the insufficient benefit is the Canadian Identity Crisis. But if 500 natives took the Parliament in 1978, what would happen? Wouldn't it be that everyone gets their unconditional income support benefit? If 500 natives ( white skin yellow skin black skin red skin) took the parliament building and all the positions as the MPs across the country, wouldn't it be that we get our income support benefits maybe at $90,000.00 per year as Canadians? This has not happened. We see instead benefits Black Outs in whole regions like Kingston, Peel, Guelph and Orangeville. This is a problem. People are hurting for the last 40 years. Money still has currency for identity. While we spend it electronically, there is the currency in which it is received or deposited into the account such as the Yen or the Rupee for example. Then there is the currency in which the benefits money is spent electronically using bank account debit cards or credit cards in the currencies of the price of the product; currencies such as British Pounds, Canadian Dollars or Australian Dollars. The question about Canadians too often is if they have any money of any kind and how much; if it's enough to survive the cold in their own country, in the great Yellow Red North of Buffalo New York. In many cases, unlike the Japanese or the Indians, they do not have with the same certainty the money that takes on less physical form in the current era and becomes a more ethereal, electronic phenomenon. Cr eye is not legally elected and cannot form a government. He is a figment of the "land of make believe.". He is a Trudough stooge to cover Trudough's shame. The idea is we are united in covering the Trudough family's political miss for 10 years. A naked woman with a real healthy smelly vagina is sitting on Trudough's desk. She has no STDs and she looks like that model you like. It's the opportunity to do something happy, give her some money. Give her extra money. Give the whole country that extra money. Ensure all her children are paid the benefits and you do nothing. Her name is Canada. Instead we get encampments and abandonment. If you knew one Canadian was not recieving the benefits, what would you do and how would you feel? The game is over. There is no Canadian in the police database with the name Mark Carney. The Mein Kamf game is over. Harper as a grade 10 drop out has called the police on this whole game as a grade 10 drop out. He is tired. He is tired of seeing Canadians in subordination to foreigners in Canada; foreigners who have money and the Canadians do not have enough. Maybe they have none. The game is over. We let go of ego and selfishness as we put Canada first, focussing on Canada winning in the World Championship of Economics just as we do for the World Hockey championship. We will show the world how we work together. Every citizen and permanent resident is on the team. We are the proud Canadian. The other stuff going on seems to be happening in fear of a more capable White hegemonic and complete humanity that treats all with dignity. Moneyless-ness due to automation is in reality Wage-lessness: Written by Mister Die Stunde Ist-Vorbei with John Wise Trumpet with Real Economist News using notes from Warren A. Lyon, Economist; UWO, University of Scotland. DUBLIN, COTES D'ARMOR, BERLIN: