Posts

Angel Ronan™: We support "Human lives matter" with purpose, celebrating talent and the Kiwanis Club

Little House on the Prairie and the Modern day Hijab. The work is done but can you afford to enjoy, fit in with a... Family. Can you afford a family and the home space for them? Who can? 22 August 2026 By SDGCK Reports! The juxtaposition of Little House on the Prairie and Playboy alongside the traditional Hijab presents a fascinating lens for examining how different societies construct moral stability, cultural identity, and social normative clarity. This comparison highlights a contrast between the fluidity of Western individualist culture and the rooted continuity of traditional religious frameworks. Western Identity: Amorphousness, Dualism, and Cultural Re-invention The coexistence of Laura Ingalls Wilder’s Little House on the Prairie and Hugh Hefner’s Playboy within the 20th-century American cultural landscape illustrates a society characterized by moral pluralism, market-driven values, and cultural negotiation or negation; a dead white people. Moral Dualism: Little House represents the idealized agrarian ideal—piety, self-reliance, domesticity, modest femininity, and family cohesion anchored in Christian pioneer ethics. Playboy, emerging in the mid-20th century, championed sexual liberation, urban consumerism, and the secularization of desire. Institutional Indecision: Rather than representing a static consensus, American culture functions as an open marketplace where drastically opposing values coexist. The American normative framework is often amorphous because it prioritizes individual choice, expression, and market demand over a single, state-enforced, or unified religious ethos. Fluidity of Identity: This contrast shows how Western modernity allows subcultures to redefine values across decades—moving from Victorian-influenced agrarian modesty to sexual revolution hyper-hedonism—without requiring institutional collapse.

Little House on the Prairie and the Modern day Hijab. The work is done but can you afford to enjoy, fit in with a... Family. Can you afford a family and the home space for them? Who can?  22 August 2026 By SDGCK Reports!   The juxtaposition of Little House on the Prairie and Playboy alongside the traditional Hijab presents a fascinating lens for examining how different societies construct moral stability, cultural identity, and social normative clarity. This comparison highlights a contrast between the fluidity of Western individualist culture and the rooted continuity of traditional religious frameworks. Western Identity: Amorphousness, Dualism, and Cultural Re-invention The coexistence of Laura Ingalls Wilder’s Little House on the Prairie and Hugh Hefner’s Playboy within the 20th-century American cultural landscape illustrates a society characterized by moral pluralism, market-driven values, and cultural negotiation or negation; a dead white people.  Moral...

The Guy And The Opportunity...

Angel Ronan

Angel Ronan Entwerfen.

Super Hot™ is a logo and trademark available for free but it looks lit we won't have to revisit it for you. The cost is free but we suggest a donation in any amount. It takes us 20 minutes and we can do this in person with your card details or we can use screen share. I tried to give it away anyone who might claim it but an unlimited number of claimants is possible so that the gift fails in trust law. It cannot be registered by more than one person without their mutual knowledge, confidence, agreement and consent. on January 07, 2026 Super Hot™ is a logo and trademark available for free but it looks lit we won't have to revisit it for you. The cost is free but we suggest a donation in any amount. It takes us 20 minutes and we can do this in person with your card details or we can use screen share. I tried to give it away to anyone who might claim it but an unlimited number of claimants is possible so that the gift fails in trust law. It cannot be registered by more than one person without their mutual knowledge, confidence, agreement and consent.

We will not forget slavery. When Freedom has come however, we can set the numbers for our own reparative economics; the economics of reparations within the power we have taken back or given. The former colonial authorities have given us the power. All other islands have used the powers given to them to enjoy the self styled economics of reparations, compensating their own communities with a worthy income support that also satisfies the UDHR requirements but the key and primary motivation is reparations and not Submission to Whitey at the UN but the UDHR is a good idea of you see it as a model for reparations; Whitey made a helpful suggestion. We take this approach instead of being locked in a deafening resentment as we remember bondage, slavery. But, we cannot put ourselves in bondage or at the back of the bus economically when we have freedom. Your proposal connects international human rights standards, reparative justice, and macroeconomic demand. It frames reparations not just as a one-time historical settlement, but as an ongoing system of guaranteed baseline income grounded in human rights. A breakdown of how this model operates, its legal and economic mechanics, and the key challenges it faces provides useful context for this approach. Click here.

Lest We Forget is an excellent reader for University programmes. Buy it now.

The word "fons" has several meanings depending on the language or context:In Latin, it means "source" or "fountain"; in ethnology, it designates an ethnic and linguistic group in Benin; finally, it is an old or regional spelling close to French.. [1, 2, 3]. Click here.