Posts

Angel Ronan™: We support "Human lives matter" with purpose, celebrating talent and the Kiwanis Club

Nomadism vs. Institutional Order: Here is the narrative revised to explicitly incorporate and recite Queen Margrethe II’s reflection on form and life as its core theme: “One should never be so formal that one loses life, but one should never be so informal that one becomes without form of any kind.” — Queen Margrethe II of Denmark Queen Margrethe II’s observation captures the eternal tension between raw vitality and structured order. Applied to ancient child-rearing and childbirth practices, it illuminates the civilizational shift from elemental, unstructured survival to formalized maternal nurture. Jeroboam v Rehoboam is the ultimate fracture in this world and if you acknowledge the culture from whom Jeroboam seeks favour as you enjoy a quiet Kingdom when its the time of a King, then Jeroboam is a less bothersome eternal, evil nuisance. Is the kingdom as quiet as...the others even when, we know, you will always these problems and law breakers set on breaking commands 1 to 15? Most importantly, thou shall not kill. Jeroboam was a thief, pretender and killer. Click here.

Nomadism vs. Institutional Order:  Here is the narrative revised to explicitly incorporate and recite Queen Margrethe II’s reflection on form and life as its core theme: “One should never be so formal that one loses life, but one should never be so informal that one becomes without form of any kind.” — Queen Margrethe II of Denmark Queen Margrethe II’s observation captures the eternal tension between raw vitality and structured order. Applied to ancient child-rearing and childbirth practices, it illuminates the civilizational shift from elemental, unstructured survival to formalized maternal nurture.  Jeroboam v Rehoboam is the ultimate fracture in this world and if you acknowledge the culture from whom Jeroboam seeks favour as you enjoy a quiet Kingdom when its the time of a King, then Jeroboam is a less bothersome eternal, evil  nuisance.  Is the kingdom as quiet as...the others even when, we know, you will always these problems and law breakers set on breaking c...

Spanking Jerk™ is a new trademark at Angel Ronan. Use this franchise concept for a simple payment of $ USD 100.00 per day. We know your worth is what you spend and then you want to make people family or kin when you just forget about the formalities and just take. It's only $100,000.00 to pay the franchise fee for four years. We will continue on with White and Black Pepper™ Jerk. For Spanking Jerk™, we have a deal with the Hughes family of the GTA for $CAD 200.00 per day paid by Interac email transfer to londinium.mmxi@gmail.com as of Wednesday May 20th, 2026. You can't use it for free; $100 for the rent and $100 for the franchise fee. They are the boss and we are the logo designer, intellectual property and concept owner. They are now in non payment for 62 days. They say they are earning more with the trademark and they will pay. They are earning $4000.00 per day while using the Spanking Jerk™ logo. Before they earning on average $1200.00 per day. So, it works to earn more. With our concept, you can buy a whole Chicken for $10.00. GEM Event Managers is now operating the Spanking Jerk in Oshawa. They are obligated to pay $ CAD 200.00 per day. The will manage the point of sale operation that is card only until 5 pm. It is cash only after 5 pm. If you only have cash at any time you show up, that's ok. A can of Brio™ is now on sale at this location in addition to D & G Grape, Kola Champagne and other good flavours. BW 20 will also be granted the right to open a location in Hamilton after 70 successful payments at the Oshawa location. The Hughes family remain location supervisors and will collect all cash orders. We have not provided the label gratuitously. Payment is necessary. Thank you.

Angel Ronan Entwerfen

We advised Goal Cater Lines not to pay any false balance owing until she has refiled her taxes. Gary Ramerpor has advised her to go ahead and pay the curry debt based on the erroneous tax return. Andrea is hurting her and using Gary. Andrea is not helping. She is dyslexic but also intent on hurting Grace. She offers her to someone to be beaten and then she would eat her to be the next Margaret Best. Andrea and Gary did not include the property taxes for 2025. What about the mortgage interest? These figures were not added and Grace has to get this addressed on a reassessment. Andrea did not call to ask about these figures which would have been basic when assisting with good intent, considering Grace' fact scenario and situation. This is not respectful. Otherwise Gas Cater Line is a fool and an idiot for letting Andrea Fishgyalfeld and Ramapor use her for attention. She did not let me assist her. She did not take my advice to seek a refund from the previous accountant or at least explain to him that the 22 year old property needed repairs which is what the expenses exemplify. As such, she would expect a refund instead of following the CCA method. It looks like Fishgyal is trying to eat her. Nonetheless, we will not let Gas Cater Lines be a victim of fraud by David Smith; not Ramapor and Janet Smith whose alias is Andrea Befeld Fishgyal. There is no Garth or Gary Ramerpor. There seems to be a default cultural resentment of the formally trained but it could not be that reasonable and logic would have to be ignored when shared by anyone to supplant the formally trained. They are trying to hurt Gas Cater Lines and her relatives have warned her. But she keeps going down the wrong path. This is our report for anyone in a similar situation. Click here.

Wie geht die Polizei bei CIBC Simplii vor, wenn e Wo bleibt die Polizei bei CIBC Simplii, wenn Zahlungen über die 7-Tage-Frist hinaus einbehalten werden? Click here. A Canadian government service, a Court or Ministry sends a payment to a citizen amounting to $140,000.00 as unpaid salary, spousal and child support or as compensation as a victim of crime. The bank sees the payment come in for credit to the customer's account. They hold the payment or payments. They do not immediately credit the funds to the account. It's in a cue for final review. It's flashing for employee action; that they will credit the funds to the account. A customer service agent gets a call from one of the recipients about a $5.00 fee debited to his account for a withdrawal at a machine. It's kind of high. She accesses his profile and sees the $140000.00 payment pending while answering his questions about the fee. She concludes the call but does not credit the funds to the account. She leaves it pending. She sees the payment has been there for 6 weeks. She is from Kenya with Calcutta Hindu ancestry. Her mother was a manager in a Kenyan Bank and may have been very busy with international transfers. Her mother was tired of feeling intimidated by Foreign Bankers in Canada or the UK or the US, reading their MT 100 swift tracer messages who wanted the funds sent to the Indian bank credited immediately. So she woke up one morning after getting totally fed up with feeling nervous every where she goes to and from work and decided to become a London bank back office employee, working in payment processing or wire tracing. She packed up all her family but she noticed when she got to London the children she gave birth to there shouted at the Tube station manager at Arnos Grove and said "...do do do not not intimidate me me or else I will be the station manager." Anyway, if the wire transfer as a Canada to Canada transfer is sent on April 10th 2026, when must it be paid before it's a deliberate obstruction of government business, a fraud or attempt at fraud and violation of the FICB and CDIC rules? She sees the payment is cleared and approved for release. Those who release the payments are marked for promotion since it's usually a senior employee that is asked to review and release incoming payments that will eventually build up as a pile of paper or as a long list of payments in an electronic cue. Any staff member who interacts with the client can release the payment. Anyone who ignored it is responsible for the delays; and removed from the office. This takes some adjustment in terms of responsibility. However, it becomes a criminal offence if the hold is executed with mens rea (criminal intent)—specifically, fraudulent intent, deceit, or intent to deprive the lawful owner of their money. There is the director's or manager's vicarious criminal liability; in addition. Click here.

Special Cartoon Presentation.

Cryptocurrency and crime. Cryptocurrency and crime describe notable examples of cybercrime related to theft (or the otherwise illegal acquisition) of cryptocurrencies and some methods or security vulnerabilities commonly exploited. Cryptojacking is a form of cybercrime specific to cryptocurrencies used on websites to hijack a victim's resources and use them for hashing and mining cryptocurrency.