Trotsky's prophecy about capitalism shutting down in the West is really just a confirmation of your evident lack of understanding. If Capitalism is expanding elsewhere, people elsewhere would have to be funded sufficiently so that they can buy the goods. Bailing out GM was not the right answer. GM's problem was not a de facto monopoly and an emotional monopoly across North America but insufficient consumption of the product once the customer had a competitive robotically made but more expensive Japanese option. GM sold for less but was more expensive to build as the wholesale adoption of robotics was not implemented. But, if the population had basic income, the vehicle would have sold mindlessly for a while until the truth of its reliability and durability would cause you a cold or hot weather disappointment on the interstate. Welcome to GM Sierra/ Toyota Tundra. However , sales are still down in the absence of total basic income and Toyota earns 70 % on the sale of the Sierra /Tundra. The Japanese had Jesus like the Europeans long before Columbus came to teach you. They had wheels, wagon, cross bows, swords and knew about the Egyptian pyramids. You are still receiving a culture and the process began for the American on or about the year 1500 if not earlier while you give your lives to bring the basic income to other nations and pay for it in programmes like the Marshall plan, you are now receiving the culture with an Asian facade. At least Asians don't call you savages, animals and beasts. But, if you prefer a free cash dispensing machine at the banks with no card required vs. A regular payment that pays in like a job where you could plan a vehicle purchase or home ownership or rental , then you don't anticipate taking dominion in the future of your lands. The UDHR is US policy. They take human life and remove leaders by force from nations who do not facilitate this essential policy that is of benefit to US capitalist interests. Basic income is a capitalist necessity and a capitalist policy. Japan is capitalist. Kudlow is not. He is just an unwitting exterminator of American people with his policies that do not agree with capitalism for the benefit of America. One former car worker's salary at $150,000.00 is now three basic incomes for three citizens at $50,000.00 each who may also be former car workers or new members of the work force as new high school graduates or new drop outs at 16 years of age. Basic income should start at 14 years of age. The government financed the automation and robotics that unemployed the people in plans that involve 100's of years of payment back to the government but it is cheaper than employees. You now see the lowest car sale rates and building occupancy rates. The government must also finance the people under legal obligation and logically speaking under financial obligation so that the nation can enjoy its return on investment. Human beings facilitate transactions. Transactions create work, tax on sales and sales you desire. People need a little money to keep the enterprise rolling; all the people regardless of complexion. The North American People have to have some "feeling" for themselves. When they don't adopt the policies that provide for their tender, loving care it feels like a war is imminent. Did you understand piped in gas vs. Heating oil? Did you understand universal health care when it was introduced? Did you understand basic income? The residue of entitlement to a retroactive back payment remains in the discussion for all who are disenfranchised. The national policy commitments are evident. The economic benefit is evident when enforcing Basic Income. Yet, some say they are not really sure yet while they receive usd 20,000.00 and ask the bank for "3" as in usd/cad 300.00 at the Teller window. Quebec and Manitoba have a basic income above CAD 39500.00. The sales tax rate should be 20 percent. Ontario may be changing its name to Huguenotario to honor the people in that province who are still essentially Huguenot and to apologise for an unusual resistance to French Pict Natives who looked like Amerindians and who worked as missionaries in Canada to communicate French socio-economic culture that involved a disbursement or basic income. Their European presence in the Americas dates back to 1545 and remains profoundly influential when it comes to "forward moving" economic policy. Yet, there is no uncertainty about electricity, water, free health care or free Schooling and how can you say you are not sure yet a out basic income when you taught the Boy how to swim or drove them to school or coached hockey? The final purpose is certain, confident vehicle sales and property rentals. Most condos are 10 percent occupied. There is no doubt about democracy but the population should be able to motivate it self and its system to enable the existing legal entitlement. Enforcement of basic income is just the same as maintaining the Pension electronically or the Land registry also. Click here. https://www.google.com/url? Did you know Justin Trapdoeoru is a South African citizen; just South African? sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.chrc-ccdp.gc.ca/eng/file/401/download%3Ftoken%3DNb7rFbYB&ved=2ahUKEwiW4snw27bgAhWk24MKHdhTCBMQFjABegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw2r5kCeK3ea4NxqnDdikGoGThe Human Rights Tribunal is designed specifically to prevent known violations by the state. The Criminal code also prohibits human rights violations and abuses. Misfeasance in public office allows for prosecution of state officials. It could also be used to address malicious prosecution by any Police service but tortious claims are denied on public policy grounds. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is the forum for this application being brought by the best Law School in the country or the best Class Action Firm. I am good at everything but class actions involve a unique flare. Ethnic origin, age and family Status are the key grounds of descrimination when it involves the disparate provision of basic income. A valid Human Rights complaint requires one of the 11 grounds of discrimination protected under the Canadian Human Rights Act a discriminatory practice There are several ways that a person could be discriminated against. The Canadian Human Rights Act calls these discriminatory practices. The following seven discriminatory practices are prohibited by the Canadian Human Rights Act when they are based on one or more of the 11 grounds of discrimination: denying someone goods, services, facilities or accommodation; providing someone goods, services, facilities or accommodation in a way that treats them with prejudice and differently; refusing to employ or continue to employ someone, or treating them unfairly in the workplace; following policies or practices that deprive people of employment opportunities; paying men and women differently when they are doing work of the same value; retaliating against a person who has filed a complaint with the Commission or against someone who has filed a complaint for them; and harassing someone. a negative effect on you. You dont have to hire the black Afro Amerindian graduate who is part Dutch but nor do you have to suffocate his benefit entitlement. The non provision of basic income involving any citizens in a UN member state is a human rights violation. When it comes to questions as to who is running the country, there is a Privy Council, UN Charter Membership and treaties with the EU. The UN's UDHR indicates the following in confirming the rights are protected by the rule of law: Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people, Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations, Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge, Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction. There is Criminal Law legislation preventing hate crimes, misfeasance in public office and as such, the disparate application of socio-economic policies in an effort to target certain segments of the population is estopped. The term "Precariat" is therefore a fraud. There is nothing precarious about the UDHR or the UNCHR and the legal requirements of any UN signatory nation under article 25 of the UDHR to provide a basic income to its citizens regardless of complexion. The term "Precariat" is a sad descriptive when it is only used to discuss the experience of Anglo populations who should see Marines enforcing article 25 basic income at home and visiting other Anglo countries soon to end UDHR breaches in the jurisdictions where they live as the Norad countries are legally obligated and are not immune. This is also true in the Western Indies also. West Indians are signatory citizens under the UN Charter as CARICOM citizens and not a left over population that always has to be told that their livelihood and protection under the UDHR, especially article 25, is a last priority while it is a first and also a legal priorty under the UDHR and this must entail a basic income for every CARICOM citizen; also in Haiti. Based on the UDHR requirements, a basic income of usd 600.00 per month would be feasible in the West Indies. Certain old emotional and social motivations and redundant social structures may die hard but those desires are a contradiction of what is promulgated in West Indian politics, art and music if it is not consistent with E pluribus Unum and the notion of one people with one skin. Who you allow your children to marry is a separate issue but the legality of rights and entitlements is the priority as you step away from a subconscious participation in the devaluation of your people and region. This subconscious devaluation of a people and region is indicative of the Canadian experience. A basic income nationally is now implemented once and for all in compliance with the nation's positive participation in UN policies around the globe but now also at home where the gap in application at home may have been overlooked while it is now being rectified. A basic income of $40,000.00 per year at minimum is a requisite for that cold and inhospitable climate. Click here: This is an issue for consideration by the Superior Courts and the Supreme Court of Canada. It is akin to the compensation paid by the U.S. Government for all victims of 911 and to victims of US Military UNCHR breaches or war crimes against foreign civilians any where in the world in places such as Afghanistan. The absence of basic income in any country makes the people displaced persons or Refugees referred to as internally displaced persons or IDP's in their own country! Some Canadians have basic income and others do not. There is no explanation. It causes internal displacement. It is generalised violence. It is evident disparity in the treatment of certain segments of the population for inexplicable reasons. A white, Part Eskimo or Black woman in one part of the country receives basic income upwards of $50,000.00 per year and a white man in another part of the country does not receive this socio-economic benefit. He believes as he is told in Ontario that he has the right to show his determination; his essentially ancestral determination. He has happy to be a part of something with a sense of officialdom to it as the people who join his determination are an official socio-economic resistance. But, they are not really intending to be criminals or terrorists except they have not received a noted, required and essential socio-economic benefit known as basic income. What is transpiring is actually ridiculous. But, one endeavours to put into words what is transpiring as it occurs. The White or Black Amerindian is not a part of any Indian reserve. He may be associated to a church group; Anglican usually and they do whatever they want until captured or killed due to a less than discrete exercise of royal privilege in, maybe, robbing a bank or a pizzeria yet the real crime is the disparate non provision of basic income to all citizens and that includes these Black and White Amerindians. Yet, if your goal is Royal privilege then notice that the Queen receives her basic income; as a human being. What are you? You are a human being. You may receive $20,000.00 dollars as a Native reserve citizen off the coast of the Niagara Great Lakes region. He is suffering disparate treatment and it could be that his basic income will only amount to an additional $30,000.00 for a total of $50,000.00 to be equal to his cousin in Quebec. Most are content that he would receive $70,000.00 in total since the Native benefit is land compensation. The means are not in doubt and nor is the necessity of this program and policy in an auto. The solution for the population suffering disparity in one part of the country is to address the disparity in an appropriate venue such as a Human Rights Tribunal. It is a known fact that people in Quebec have a basic income. Is it that people in Ontario do not receive basic income because they are not French speaking? That would be ludicrous but Ontarians do not actually have access to this socio-economic benefit. A class action law suit or a motion granting immediate relief from this disparity might be considered. A motion is not really necessary when once it is brought to the government's attention they can amend the disparity as disparity in the provision of policy is not their policy mandate. This is evident in all documents published by the new and old government. As they intend to comply and rectify glaring errors, a motion is not necessary. There is no adversarial issue here. There is no issue in contention. There is no need for a motion here. The country has sought to be a member of the UN Security Council to secure our UN Protected human rights at home and abroad. The UN has a Military to enforce compliance or impose sanctions when open breaches are identified in member states. Canada has participated in several of these missions.

Trotsky's prophecy about capitalism shutting down in the West  is really just a confirmation of your evident lack of understanding.  If Capitalism is expanding elsewhere, people elsewhere  would have to be funded sufficiently so that they can buy the goods.   Bailing out GM was not the right answer. GM's problem was not a de facto monopoly and an emotional monopoly across North America but insufficient consumption of the product once the customer had a competitive robotically made  but more expensive Japanese option. GM sold for less but was more expensive to build as the wholesale adoption of  robotics was not implemented. But, if the population had basic income, the vehicle would have sold mindlessly  for a while until the truth of its reliability and durability  would cause you a cold or hot weather disappointment on the interstate. Welcome to GM Sierra/ Toyota Tundra.  However , sales are still down in the absence of total basic income and Toyota earns 70 % on the sale of the Sierra /Tundra.  The Japanese had Jesus like the Europeans long before Columbus came to teach you. They had wheels, wagon, cross bows, swords  and knew about the Egyptian pyramids. You are still receiving a culture and the process began for the American on or about the year 1500 if not earlier while you give your lives to bring the basic income to other nations and pay for it in programmes like the Marshall plan, you are now receiving the culture with an Asian facade. At least Asians don't call you savages, animals and beasts. But, if you prefer a free cash dispensing machine at the banks with no card required vs. A regular payment that pays in like a job where you could plan a vehicle purchase or home ownership or rental , then you don't anticipate taking dominion in the future of your lands.     The UDHR is US policy. They take human life and remove leaders by force from nations who do not facilitate this essential policy that is of benefit to US capitalist interests.  Basic income is a capitalist necessity and a capitalist policy. Japan is capitalist.  Kudlow is not. He is just an unwitting  exterminator of American people with his policies that do not agree with capitalism for the benefit of America.  One former car worker's salary at $150,000.00 is now three basic incomes  for three citizens at $50,000.00 each who may also be former car workers or new members of the work force as new high school graduates or new drop outs at 16 years of age.  Basic income should start at 14 years of age. The government financed the automation and robotics  that unemployed the people in plans that involve 100's of years of payment back to the government but it is cheaper than employees.   You now see the lowest car sale rates and building occupancy rates.   The government must also finance the people under legal obligation and logically speaking under financial obligation  so that the nation can enjoy its return on investment.  Human beings facilitate transactions. Transactions create work, tax on sales and sales you desire. People need a little money to keep the enterprise rolling; all the people regardless of complexion.   The North American People have to have some "feeling" for themselves.  When they don't adopt the policies that provide for their tender, loving care it feels like a war is imminent.   Did you understand piped in gas vs. Heating oil?  Did you understand universal health care when it was introduced?  Did you understand basic income?  The residue of entitlement to a retroactive back payment remains in the discussion for all who are  disenfranchised.  The national policy commitments are evident. The economic benefit is evident when enforcing Basic Income.  Yet, some say they are not really sure yet while they receive usd 20,000.00 and ask the bank for  "3" as in usd/cad 300.00 at the Teller window.  Quebec and Manitoba have a basic income above CAD 39500.00.  The sales tax rate should be 20 percent.  Ontario may be changing its name to Huguenotario to honor the people in that province who are still essentially Huguenot and to apologise for an unusual resistance to French Pict  Natives who looked like Amerindians and who worked as missionaries in Canada to communicate French socio-economic culture that involved a disbursement or basic income. Their European presence in the Americas   dates back to 1545 and remains profoundly influential when it comes to "forward moving" economic policy.    Yet, there is no uncertainty about electricity, water, free health  care or free Schooling and how can  you say you are not sure yet a out basic income  when you taught the Boy how to swim or drove them to school or coached hockey? The final purpose is certain, confident vehicle sales and property rentals. Most condos are 10 percent occupied.  There is no doubt about democracy but the population should be able to motivate it self and its system to enable the existing legal entitlement.   Enforcement of basic income is just the same as maintaining the  Pension electronically or the Land registry also.   Click here.    https://www.google.com/url?  Did you know Justin Trapdoeoru is a South African citizen; just South African? sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.chrc-ccdp.gc.ca/eng/file/401/download%3Ftoken%3DNb7rFbYB&ved=2ahUKEwiW4snw27bgAhWk24MKHdhTCBMQFjABegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw2r5kCeK3ea4NxqnDdikGoGThe Human Rights Tribunal is designed specifically to prevent known violations by the state.  The Criminal code also prohibits human rights violations and abuses. Misfeasance in public office allows for prosecution of state officials.  It could also be used to address malicious prosecution by any Police service but tortious claims are denied on public policy grounds.  The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is the forum for this application being brought by the best Law School in the country or the best Class Action Firm. I am good at everything but class actions involve a unique flare.   Ethnic origin, age and family Status are the key grounds of descrimination when it involves the disparate provision of basic   income.  A valid  Human Rights complaint  requires  one of the 11 grounds of discrimination protected under the Canadian Human Rights Act a discriminatory practice There are several ways that a person could be discriminated against. The Canadian Human Rights Act calls these discriminatory practices. The following seven discriminatory practices are prohibited by the Canadian Human Rights Act when they are based on one or more of the 11 grounds of discrimination:  denying someone goods, services, facilities or accommodation; providing someone goods, services, facilities or accommodation in a way that treats them with prejudice and differently; refusing to employ or continue to employ someone, or treating them unfairly in the workplace; following policies or practices that deprive people of employment opportunities; paying men and women differently when they are doing work of the same value; retaliating against a person who has filed a complaint with the Commission or against someone who has filed a complaint for them; and harassing someone. a negative effect on you.  You dont have to hire the black Afro Amerindian graduate who is part Dutch but nor do  you  have to suffocate his benefit entitlement.   The non provision of basic income involving any  citizens in a UN member state is a human rights violation. When it comes to questions as to who is running the country, there is a Privy Council, UN Charter Membership and treaties with the EU.    The UN's  UDHR indicates the following in confirming the rights are protected by the rule of law:  Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,  Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,  Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,  Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,  Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,  Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,  Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,  Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.     There is Criminal Law legislation  preventing hate crimes, misfeasance in public office and as such, the disparate application of socio-economic policies in an effort to target certain segments of the population is estopped.  The term "Precariat" is therefore a fraud.  There is nothing precarious about the UDHR or the UNCHR and the legal requirements  of any UN signatory nation under article 25 of the UDHR to provide a basic income to its citizens regardless of complexion.    The term "Precariat" is a sad descriptive  when it is only used to discuss the experience of Anglo populations who should see  Marines enforcing article 25 basic income at home and  visiting  other Anglo  countries soon to end UDHR breaches in the jurisdictions where they live as the Norad countries are legally obligated and are not immune. This is also true in the Western Indies also. West Indians are signatory citizens under the UN Charter as CARICOM citizens  and not a left over population that always has to be told that their livelihood and protection under the UDHR, especially article 25,  is a last priority while it is a first and also a legal priorty under the UDHR and this must entail a basic income for every CARICOM citizen; also in Haiti.  Based on the UDHR requirements, a basic income of usd 600.00 per month would be feasible in the West Indies.   Certain old emotional and social motivations and redundant social structures may die hard but those desires are a contradiction of what is promulgated in West Indian politics, art and music if it is not consistent with E pluribus Unum and the notion of one people with one skin. Who you allow your children to marry is a separate issue but the legality of rights and entitlements is the priority as you step away from a subconscious  participation in the devaluation of your people and region.  This subconscious devaluation of a people and region is indicative of the Canadian experience.  A basic income  nationally is now implemented once and for all in compliance with the nation's positive participation in UN policies around the globe but now also at home where the gap in application at home may have been overlooked while it is now being rectified.  A basic income of $40,000.00 per year at minimum is a requisite  for that cold and inhospitable climate.      Click here: This is an issue for consideration by the Superior Courts and the Supreme Court of Canada. It is akin to the compensation paid by the U.S. Government for all victims of 911 and to victims of  US Military UNCHR breaches or war crimes  against foreign  civilians any where in the world in places such as Afghanistan.     The absence of basic income in any country makes the people displaced persons or  Refugees referred to as internally  displaced persons or IDP's in their own country! Some Canadians have basic income  and others do not. There is no explanation.  It causes internal displacement.  It is generalised violence. It is evident disparity in the treatment of certain segments of the population for inexplicable reasons.  A white, Part Eskimo or Black  woman in one part of the country receives basic income upwards of $50,000.00 per year and a white man in another part of the country does not receive this socio-economic benefit.  He believes as he is told in Ontario that he has the right to show his determination; his essentially ancestral determination. He has happy to be a part of something with a sense of officialdom to it as the people who join his determination are an official socio-economic resistance.    But, they are not really intending to be criminals or terrorists except they have not received a noted, required and essential socio-economic benefit known as basic income.   What is transpiring is actually ridiculous. But, one endeavours to put into words what is transpiring as it occurs.   The White or Black Amerindian  is not a part of any Indian reserve. He may be associated to a church group; Anglican usually and they do whatever they want until captured or killed due to a less than discrete exercise of royal privilege in, maybe, robbing a bank or a pizzeria yet the real crime is the disparate non provision of basic income to all citizens and that includes these Black and White Amerindians. Yet, if your  goal is Royal privilege then notice that the Queen receives her basic income;  as a human being.  What are you?  You are a human being.    You may receive $20,000.00 dollars as a Native reserve citizen off the coast of the Niagara Great Lakes region.  He is suffering disparate treatment and it could be that his basic income will only amount to an additional $30,000.00 for  a total of $50,000.00 to be equal to his cousin in Quebec.   Most are content that he would receive $70,000.00 in total since the Native benefit is land compensation.   The means are not in doubt and nor is the necessity of this program and policy in an auto.  The solution for the population suffering disparity in one part of the country is to address the disparity in an appropriate venue such as a Human Rights Tribunal.       It is a known fact that people in Quebec have a basic income. Is it that people in Ontario do not receive basic income because they are not French speaking? That would be ludicrous but Ontarians do not actually have access to this socio-economic benefit. A class action law suit or a motion granting immediate relief from this disparity might be considered. A motion is not really necessary when once it is brought to the government's attention they can amend the disparity as disparity in the provision of policy  is not their policy mandate. This is evident in all  documents published by the new and old government.   As they intend to comply and rectify glaring errors,  a motion is not necessary. There is no adversarial issue here. There is no issue in contention. There is no need for a motion here. The country has sought to be a member of the UN Security Council to secure our UN Protected human rights at home and abroad. The UN has a Military to enforce compliance or impose sanctions when open breaches are identified in member states.  Canada has participated in several of these missions.