The key issue in the Donald Impeachment case is intention. This refers to the intention behind contacting the Ukraines to clarify information he had already received from Ukrainian police involving suspicious activity involving the Biddens. It had nothing to do with attacking political rivals. Arresting a drug dealer for possession of narcotics even though the dealer is a registered Democrat aspiring to be a candidate is not an abuse of power. Arresting a money launderer who hopes to launder through the Ukraine, is not an attack on a rival even if he is a candidate. It is doing your job. His job description as President sets out what authority he can exercise in the carriage of his duties and this involves using any means necessary to defend the nation's security and investigate all activity concerning the same as Bidden is not a current representative of the state. If he was a UN ambassador on a UN mission in the Ukraine, then it would have satisfied protocol for former government employees. His unilateral trip to the Ukraine did not satisfy several protocols as to the requirement to specify the declared purpose of the trip which would be a criminal matter the Bidden's would have to answer in Court. You suffered a glitch in judgement. That's ok. Your political aspirations are not greater than the constitution. You will be dealt with. The nation owes Donald an apology. Truthfully, no offence has been committed as there is no ultra virus or unlawful act being committed by the President. His intention fits squarely within the Presidential mandate and job description set out in the Presidential Guide Book written by the U.S. Government in 1789. In other words, there is no case to answer. The impeachment charge must be withdrawn. The Ukraine did not get any from Bidden. There is no point swearing oaths during a trial when there is no offence. But if you do, the evidence of both sides is not in opposition. See www.angelronangreenfieldurban.blogspot.ca.

The key issue in the Donald Impeachment case is intention. This refers to the intention behind contacting the Ukraines to clarify information he had already received from Ukrainian police involving suspicious activity involving the Biddens. It had nothing to do with attacking political rivals. Arresting a drug dealer for possession of narcotics even though the dealer is a registered Democrat aspiring to be a candidate is not an abuse of power.   Arresting a money launderer who hopes to launder through the Ukraine, is not an attack on a rival even if he is a candidate.   It is doing your job.  His job description as President sets out what authority he can exercise in the carriage of his duties and this involves using any means necessary to defend the nation's security and investigate all activity concerning the same as Bidden is not a current representative of the state.    If he was a UN ambassador on a UN mission in the Ukraine, then it would have satisfied protocol for former government employees.  His unilateral trip to the Ukraine did not satisfy several protocols as to the requirement to specify the  declared purpose of the trip which would be a criminal matter the Bidden's would have to answer in Court. You suffered a glitch in judgement. That's ok.  Your political aspirations are not greater than the constitution.  You will be dealt with.
The nation owes Donald an apology.  Truthfully,  no offence has been committed as there is no ultra virus  or unlawful act being committed by the President.   His intention fits squarely within the Presidential mandate and job description set out in the Presidential Guide Book written by the U.S. Government in 1789. In other words, there is no case to answer.  The impeachment charge must be withdrawn.  The Ukraine did not get any from Bidden.   There is no point swearing oaths during a trial when there is no offence.  But if you do, the evidence of both sides is not in opposition.  See www.angelronangreenfieldurban.blogspot.ca.