Jane Austen says in several of her books , in an unusual attempt to kill every first born male among the middle and lower classes cunningly shared a myth that inheritance by law goes to the first born male of every family. Herod was more direct in killing the first born. The truth is there is no law involving inheritance going to the first born male. The masses leaving servitude and slavery, going up in the world, would be or are divided over this legal myth and ironically, Jane was really a Jorge'; born a boy. The poor people make the concept of inheritance a crisis. Are you doing this, turning inheritance into a crisis? Are you trying to inherit someones NHS or medicaid? Are you trying to inherit a law degree or a Insurance salesman license? You are just pure, raw anthropology. You act like every sad ignorant dysfunction you read into situations around you as a kid although you have no witness statements of transcripts to say what really happened to grandma has to be re-enacted. You seem to think your grandmother was drugged to degenerate and killed for her property in the Bahamas and if you could do it, you would have added one efficient clincher which would be to drug and destroy socially the youngest in the family to ensure your position, free of competition and be the only one; lest he, as you fear, becomes a music star or a NFL Dynamo. During Covid, we are at war with ignorance. Learn the consequences of your ignorance; your conspiracy to murder. You act like you are in a family unit for the very first time. Read the other English novel where the father and mother, pursuant to English law, gave every child. Male and female, two sheep and a 1/4 share of the property in a will that they wrote confirming what was to happen to their 8 sheep and the farm in Kenwood and the house Borehamhood. Now, if you imagine a man and woman like that could be your family, shouldnt you take a conveyancing course to know how to manage the family property. The principle case for Conveyancing these days is Rylands v. Fletcher. Foskett v. Mceown is also helpful. It is rather unusual as to how many people on all sides of the family just disappear within five years after a Black man or woman turns 70 years old when they own something. Then, the government takes the property when they tried to kill the old person if she was stupid about inheritance.

Jane Austen says in several of her books , in an unusual  attempt to kill every first born male among the middle and lower classes cunningly shared a myth that inheritance by law goes to the first born male of every family. Herod was more direct in killing the first born.  The truth is there is no law involving inheritance going to the first born male.  The masses leaving servitude and slavery, going up in the world, would be or are divided over this legal myth and ironically, Jane was really a Jorge'; born a boy.   The poor people make the concept of inheritance a crisis.  Are you doing this, turning inheritance into a crisis?  Are you trying to inherit someones NHS or medicaid? Are you trying to inherit a law degree or a Insurance salesman license?  
You are just pure, raw anthropology.  You act like every sad ignorant dysfunction you read into situations around you as a kid although you have no witness statements of transcripts to say what really happened to grandma has to be re-enacted.  You seem to think your grandmother was drugged to degenerate and killed for her property in the Bahamas  and if you could do it, you would have added one efficient clincher which would be to drug and destroy socially the youngest in the family to ensure your position, free of competition and be the only one; lest he, as you fear, becomes a music star or a NFL Dynamo.    During Covid, we are at war with ignorance.  Learn the consequences of your ignorance; your conspiracy to murder. You act like you are in a family unit for the very first time.  Read the other English novel where the father and mother, pursuant to English  law, gave every child. Male and female, two sheep and a 1/4 share of the property in a will that they wrote confirming what was to happen to their 8 sheep and the farm in Kenwood and the house Borehamhood.   Now, if you imagine a man and woman  like that could be your family, shouldnt you take a conveyancing course to know how to manage the family property.  The principle case for Conveyancing these days is Rylands v. Fletcher. Foskett v.  Mceown is also helpful. 
  
It is rather unusual as to how many people on all sides of the family just disappear within five years after a Black man or woman turns 70 years old when they own something. Then, the government takes the property when they tried to kill the old person if she was stupid about inheritance.    


Comments