So, if it's 100 grams of marijuana purchased down by the London docks with the intention to use it for medical purposes, what do you do if you are told to pop the trunk by a constable and the weed is right there in front of him beside your 50 roll pack of toilet paper and the large 100 roll pack of paper towels? You tell him you intended to buy everything in bulk. That should be the end of it and he will let you close your trunk and go home for Christmas and start your chocolate cheese cake with all the family and you are the daddy. Say "daddy" in an English accent. But, what if he does not agree with you? What if you tell him that he had no reasonable and probable grounds to pull you over and the evidence is forfeit anyway? Then you are going to Court because he is not being paid to agree with you but with the law and if you speak the law, he should probably agree and let you go but maybe he will record the phenomenon and the contents and seize 99 grams and leave you with one gram along with a formal warning and a promise that they'll be watching. The reason is that the presumption necessary to seize the drugs and arrest you may not be sufficient to convict and you could say that there is no evidence of tracking. If you really only use it for medical personal purposes, there will be no evidence of trafficking. The issue is that the presumption is you have 100 grams in your possession for the purposes of trafficking bit you are just really a fifth generation church school bus driver from the Bahamas and you have a posh accent; innit? Maybe you lend some weed to your cousin every now and again during the big football game you air on your Samsung Wall TV and he will return it, paying you a six pack of Strongbow as interest. Maybe he will let you keep all of it because you spoke really really humbly and you support his football club. Anyway, your cousin is now working at a shopping mall with shops full of display items only and at the back of the mall is an Argos order Server and distribution system, serving all the shops. In other words, there are no watches inside the H. Samuel and no sweaters inside the Benetton shop. They do not have to participate. Their employees are carefully vetted and bonded as former airport employees; possibly summer job applicants. But, when you show up to purchase it, they have 100 on hand in he system and you bought one which is fetched by a runner who picks it up from the distribution center at the back of the mall, inside the building. If you were the only customer that day, the system will say they have 99 sweaters of that color on hand tomorrow morning. If five disappear overnight, you have a loss prevention problem. Who swiped his card to get into the distribution center last night totally smoked upon that medical marijuana from his cousin who offers him some as they watched the football game on the Samsung Wall™? My tv is only 100 inches; huge and big enough for me!

 So, if it's 100 grams of marijuana purchased down by the London docks with the intention to use it for medical purposes, what do you do if you are told to pop the trunk by a constable and the weed is right there in front of him beside your 50 roll pack of  toilet paper and the large 100 roll pack of paper towels?  You tell him you intended to buy everything in bulk.  That should be the end of it and he will let you close your trunk and go home for Christmas and start your chocolate cheese cake with all the family and you are the daddy. Say "daddy" in an English accent.  But, what if he does not agree with you?  What if you tell him that he had no reasonable and probable grounds to pull you over and the evidence is forfeit anyway?  Then you are going to Court because he is not being paid to agree with you but with the law and if you speak the law, he should probably agree and let you go but maybe he will record the phenomenon and the contents and seize 99 grams and leave you with one gram along with a formal warning and a promise that they'll be watching.  The reason is that the presumption necessary to seize the drugs and arrest you may not be sufficient to convict and you could say that there is no evidence of tracking.  If you really only use it for medical personal purposes, there will be no evidence of trafficking.  The issue is that the presumption is you have 100 grams in your possession for the purposes of trafficking bit you are just really a fifth generation church school bus driver from the Bahamas and you have a posh accent; innit?    Maybe you lend some weed to your cousin every now and again during the big football game you air on your Samsung Wall TV and he will return it, paying you a six  pack of  Strongbow as interest. Maybe he will let you keep all of it because you spoke really really humbly and you support his football club. Anyway, your cousin is now working at a shopping mall with shops full of display items only and at the back of the mall is an Argos order Server and distribution system, serving all the shops.   In other words,  there are no watches inside the  H. Samuel and no sweaters inside the  Benetton shop. They do not have to participate. Their employees are carefully vetted and bonded as former airport employees; possibly summer job applicants.        But, when you show up to purchase it, they have 100 on hand in he system and you bought one which is fetched by a runner who picks it up from the distribution center at the back of the mall, inside the building.  If you were the only customer that day, the system will say they have 99 sweaters of that color on hand tomorrow morning. If five disappear overnight, you have a loss prevention problem. Who swiped his card to get into the distribution center last night totally smoked upon that medical marijuana from his cousin who offers him some as they watched the football  game on the Samsung Wall™? My tv is only 100 inches; huge and big enough for me!