This is the cold hard legal case:. You may have bet on the U.S. election result but, any contract based on an illegal, prohibited arrangement is void. It is void as an admirable but prohibited challenger was not legally entitled to participate. We know what happened between Rehoboam and Jeroboam and Israel was divided. Based on the projected electrical map of election results, it suggests the majority of US territory voted for the incumbent. See 18 U.S. Code § 595: Interference by administrative employees of Federal, State, or Territorial Governments. We welcome the energy of the challengers and their promises to make it right for failing to implement the requisite universal unconditional minimum income support economic plan dating back to 2012. The incumbent has taken over the mantle. However as a warning to many, being a person employed in any administrative position by the United States(The former President's and former Vice President's are paid administrators of libraries), or by any department or agency thereof, or by the District of Columbia or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or by any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States, or any political subdivision, municipality, or agency thereof, or agency of such political subdivision or municipality (including any corporation owned or controlled by any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States or by any such political subdivision, municipality, or agency), in connection with any activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States, or any department or agency thereof, uses his official authority for the purpose of interfering with, or affecting, the nomination or the election of any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. This section shall not prohibit or make unlawful any act by any officer or employee of any educational or research institution, establishment, agency, or system which is supported in whole or in part by any state or political subdivision thereof, or by the District of Columbia or by any Territory or Possession of the United States; or by any recognized religious, philanthropic or cultural organization. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 720; Pub. L. 91–405, title II, § 204(d)(6), Sept. 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 853; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), (L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.). In the uncertainty of the incomplete election results with mail in votes still turning up in Walmart shipments, at Puerto Rican Airports and at churches, how are people calling for an office transition; people who are in official roles when we only have a CNN projection as the basis for this discussion? This is illegal.

This is the cold hard legal case:.   You may have bet on the U.S. election result but, any contract based on an illegal, prohibited arrangement is void. It is void as an admirable but prohibited challenger was not legally entitled to participate.  We know what happened between Rehoboam and Jeroboam and Israel was divided.  Based on the projected electrical map of election results, it suggests the majority of US territory voted for the incumbent. See         18 U.S. Code § 595:   Interference by administrative employees of Federal, State, or Territorial Governments.   We welcome the energy of the challengers and their promises to make it right for failing to implement the requisite universal unconditional minimum income support economic plan dating back to 2012.  The incumbent has taken over the mantle.  However as a warning to many,   being a person employed in any administrative position by the United States(The former President's and former Vice President's are paid administrators of libraries), or by any department or agency thereof, or by the District of Columbia or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or by any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States, or any political subdivision, municipality, or agency thereof, or agency of such political subdivision or municipality (including any corporation owned or controlled by any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States or by any such political subdivision, municipality, or agency), in connection with any activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States, or any department or agency thereof, uses his official authority for the purpose of interfering with, or affecting, the nomination or the election of any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.  This section shall not prohibit or make unlawful any act by any officer or employee of any educational or research institution, establishment, agency, or system which is supported in whole or in part by any state or political subdivision thereof, or by the District of Columbia or by any Territory or Possession of the United States; or by any recognized religious, philanthropic or cultural organization.  (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 720; Pub. L. 91–405, title II, § 204(d)(6), Sept. 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 853; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), (L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.).  In the uncertainty of the incomplete election results with mail in votes still turning up in Walmart shipments, at Puerto Rican Airports and at churches, how are people calling for an office transition; people who are in official roles when we only have a CNN projection as the basis for this discussion? This is illegal.