According to Woipl.net,"Self defense is a process of countermeasures that can be used to maintain your well-being against attack/harm from another." If you are defending the country or an election process, the constitution and the criminal code are the written rules of engagement. The US election process as considered sacred has been suffering an on-going attack since 1992 by unscrupulous individuals who herald a Louisiana Guerilla politics as their mantra. Much of it is illegal and challenges every aspect of our democracy that we are to consider sacred. The safety and security of property is also threatened as these same individuals have little respect for the safeguards to property and security of person as guaranteed by domestic and international law. The changes to our legal processes and financial system enabling these unscrupulous individuals to take advantage of Americans and their education or understanding of the law and financial processes is called "Deregulation." Deregulation is tantamount to financial terrorism as the evidence of the US subprime mortgage debacle demonstrates. The most honest response in the current US quagmire for both sides is to ask what happened to the votes instead of declaring a winner by any means. Donald is concerned about a sense of legitimacy in his second term but if someone stole all the post boxes what would you do? If they cut all the internet cables if it was a vote by email, what would you do? If he interrupted the election only to declare himself the winner, then you would not agree with him and run away. You would stand your grand. You would stand up and do your job. Maybe call another election in a few months; maybe a year and tell him that he must comply with the procedures related to being a candidate as a current or former employee of the government. It is childish to suggest that you know what Joe B is doing has happened before. It did not happen before. Even if you suggest it did happen before, it does not justify your attempt to do it again; that you are entitled to the same favor or exemption. Who are you? What are you like? Please see www.w0ipl.net for more. Click here. __________________________________________

 

According to Woipl.net,"Self defense is a process of countermeasures that can be used to maintain your well-being against attack/harm from another."  If you are defending the country or an election process, the constitution and the criminal code are the written rules of engagement.  The US election process as considered sacred has been suffering an on-going attack since 1992 by unscrupulous individuals who herald a Louisiana Guerilla politics as their mantra. Much of it is illegal and challenges every aspect of our democracy that we are to consider sacred.  The safety and security of property is also threatened as these same individuals have little respect for the safeguards to property and security of person as guaranteed by domestic and international law. The changes to our legal processes and financial system enabling these unscrupulous individuals to take advantage of Americans and their education or understanding of the law and financial processes is called "Deregulation." Deregulation is tantamount to financial terrorism as the evidence of the US subprime mortgage debacle demonstrates.     The most honest response in the current US quagmire for both sides is to ask what happened to the votes instead of declaring a winner by any means.  Donald is concerned about a sense of legitimacy in his second term but if someone stole all the post boxes what would you do?  If they cut all the internet cables if it was a vote by email, what would you do? If he interrupted the election only to declare himself the winner, then you would not agree with him and run away. You would stand your grand.  You would stand up and do your job.   Maybe call another election in a few months; maybe a year and tell him that he must comply with the procedures related to  being a candidate as a current or former employee of the government. It is childish to suggest that you know what Joe B  is doing has happened before. It did not happen before.  Even if you suggest it did happen before, it does not justify your attempt to do it again; that you are entitled to the same favor or exemption.  Who are you? What are you like?   Please see www.w0ipl.net for more. Click here.      

__________________________________________



Self defense is a process of countermeasures that can be used to maintain your well-being against attack/harm from another.

The very best self defense is avoidance!
If you are not involved in an incident, you do not need to take action against it.

Self defense can not use force stronger than the threat.
More simply you can not use deadly force to counter a non-deadly force threat.

My Rights

The "right of self-defense" is the right of a person to use reasonable and appropriate force to defend one's own life and well-being; including the use of deadly force, if necessary.

Early Roman Law theories make no distinction between defense of the person and defense of property. This builds on the principle of dominium where any attack on the members of the family or the property it owned was considered a personal attack on the pater familias - the male head of the household, sole owner of all property belonging to the household, and endowed by law with dominion over all his descendants.

The right to self-defense is phrased as the principle of vim vi repellere licet ("it is permitted to repel force by force") in the Digest of Justitian (6th century).

Human Rights

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states:
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

It follows then that laws must simultaneously criminalize aggression resulting in loss or injury, but decriminalize qualitatively identical violence causing loss or injury because it is used in self-defense. More simply, violence in defense of person is appropriate because it takes right from the criminal and returns it to the owner/victim.




E-mail at: w0ipl@arrl.net

Comments