When a judgement is released in the common law world, it impacts that world whether it is wrong or right. The thing we don't like about the common law in American lower Courts is the creole mixing of principles from different bodies of law. Involuntary Manslaughter would have to involve something more than negligent inaction in a state that allows 15 year old citizens to own and carry guns when tbey are not likely to carry the maturity to own a weapon. It is a gun and the state is knowingly aware of the fact that 15 year olds are not adults, that they are in school and are still developing a conscience of their own and should probably not be able to own a gun legally. So, then the state is guilty of involuntary manslaughter now when they knew 15 year olds are not developmentally ready to understand the consequences. Maybe the school teachers who spend more time with children than parents do are also guilty of involuntary manslaughter. Who owes the public a duty of care where we can ask if there is a breach of that duty, causing injury and then liability in tort law negligence? Is there any criminal liability in this scenario? SCOTUS law is the law of the land? Let us take a look at SCOTUS law and see how it contrasts to what is happening in the lower Court as SCOTUS law is national in scope. Law is not white. It's not a news station. It's not black but it is knowable and it has a standard. Maybe we presume 16 year olds are ready to own guns if they have passed a driver's training course and obtained a license as the course achievement. The point of this judgement will change gun laws to prevent minors from owning them under the laws of Michigan before we are all involuntarily guilty of not vetting the emotions of any would be gun owner at any age. What about the postal worker...who owns a gun? There will be a judgement coming out soon on E. Darn Caramel involving her criminal outfit that uses means to harass and demean people with with post secondary education and interrupt some aspects of their lives with fraudulent interference and witchery on their Scotia account. She is being taken in for possession of the proceeds of crime. Written by B. Jann Carmel.

 

By Angel Ronan Bank™ (of Knowledge).  

When a judgement is released in the common law world,   it impacts that world whether it is wrong or right.  

The thing we don't like about the common law in American lower Courts is the creole mixing of principles  from different bodies of law. Involuntary Manslaughter would have to involve something more than negligent inaction in a state that allows 15 year old citizens to own and carry guns when tbey are not likely to carry the maturity to own a weapon.  It is a gun and the state is knowingly aware of the fact that 15 year olds are not adults, that they are in school and are still developing a conscience of their own and should probably not be able to own a gun legally.  So, then the state is guilty of involuntary manslaughter now when they knew 15 year olds are not developmentally ready to understand the consequences.  Maybe the school teachers who spend more time with children than parents do are also guilty of involuntary manslaughter.  Who owes the public a duty of care where we can ask if there is a breach of that duty, causing injury and then liability in tort law negligence for some action or inaction?  

Is there any criminal  liability in this scenario?  SCOTUS law is the law of the land.   Let us take a look at SCOTUS law and see how it contrasts to what is happening in the lower Court as SCOTUS law is national in scope. Law is not white.  It's not a news station.  It's not black but it is knowable and it has a standard.   

  Maybe we presume 16 year olds are ready to own guns if they have passed a driver's training course and obtained a license as the course completion is an achievement.  

The point of this judgement will change gun laws to prevent minors from owning them under the laws of Michigan before we are all involuntarily guilty of not vetting the emotions of any would be gun owner at any age.  What about the postal worker...who owns a gun?  

The legal principles and their misapplication will be resolved.   

There will be a judgement coming out soon on E. Darn Caramel involving her criminal outfit that uses means to harass and demean people  using illegal  false documents; she  especially harasses those with  post secondary education and interrupt some aspects of their lives with fraudulent interference and  witchery on their Scotia account. 

 She is being taken in for possession of the proceeds of crime.   

Written by B. Jann Carmel.  

By Angel Ronan Bank™ ( of Knowledge).