The Law and Diversity: What PRIDE is it? Maybe PRIDE was about some belief in diversity generally but what is in the coffee? We ask this because it seems if you show up and ask for your benefits or housing, Pride in action that is to serve the applicant citizen is not as proudly resolved as what we see displayed here but the applicant is kind of mistreated in some way rather often and not properly served with pride. It seems to be about what you think you can get away with if the Authority is not resolved to kill you if you do not do your job. Its Criminal Mischief or its Criminal Reckless Endangerment of Human Life. See R v. G; both criminal offences if the person is not helped. How does a character like this get the job? In some cases, hotels receive benefit payments for emergency housing recipients. The hotel, however, does not confirm to the emergency housing recipient that the payment for their stay was received. The recipient notifies the Council Authority or Public Authority that the hotel says they do not see the money yet. The Public Authority does not confirm the payment information to the benefit recipient; nor do they confirm the payment again to the hotel. So, there is a communication limbo or the dna's hope for an interception. The hotel employee says she does not care what happens to the housing recipient if he might die tomorrow night as she says again she does not see the money credited to his hotel room account bill. But she sees the money. They have the money. The only solution is as follows: Confirm the payment to the housing benefit recipient and the reference number with date of payment to the hotel as the benefit recipient gave his hotel room number to the Public Housing Authority. Confirm again the same information to the hotel. Would the hotel continue to insist they did not receive it? Will they call the police on the benefit recipient? If they do, you just charge the hotel manager with Reckless Endangerment. It seems that the hotel is hoping for the benefit recipient to leave the hotel without knowledge that their stay was covered; and to also keep the money sent from the Public Authority. The benefit recipient did leave in the end as they had no confirmation that their stay was covered for the month. The hotel kept the money. The Public Authority Harrow is now debiting the Hotel accounts to which payment was sent. Was it Premier at Wembley, Ramada at Barnet, Premier Inn at Hampstead and Travelodge at Farringdon and the Royal Scot Travelodge at King's Cross? The money is now being sent to the Housing applicant who had to pay his own stay; to his Halifax account and this is in addition to his income benefit that it being held in the branch sundry account since December 2022 at the Edgeware Road branch and is being paid out as cash on the tenth of every month after not releasing the payment into the customer's account in dereliction of the Crown duty for which the bank is paid an extra sum under contract with the government; after being credited in to the branch on the 30th day of the month when paid. The Bank employee who has failed to fulfill the Crown duty in releasing all benefits payments says she believes the woman whose egg from which she was conceived has committed to getting her head cut off but she is convicted for all her crimes with some jail time. This employee also confirms that she does not release the payments sent to black people but leaves it in the bank branch sundry; the account the government pays the monies into as intended for various recipients. But a fast payment from the government made directly to the recipient would avoid this chance of interception. This is also a case of reckless endangerment. Many people have been unable to maintain their family support payments, food, rents and other living costs. How is it that there is a bank in Canada collecting his benefit monies since he was 13 years old but he never got a statement. He opened an account with the bank more than once and they never notified him of the account details; an account opened by his father with his name but he did not know and nor was he ever told.

 The Law and Diversity: What PRIDE is it?  Maybe PRIDE was about some belief in diversity generally but what is in the coffee?   We ask this because it seems if you show up and ask for your benefits or housing, Pride in action that is to serve the applicant citizen is not as proudly resolved as what we see displayed here but the applicant is kind of mistreated in some way rather often and not properly served with pride.   It seems to be about what you think you can get away with if the Authority is not resolved to kill you if you do not do your job. Its Criminal Mischief or its Criminal Reckless Endangerment of Human Life. See R v. G;  both criminal offences if the person is not helped.    How does a character like this get the job?  
In some cases, hotels receive benefit payments for emergency housing recipients.  The hotel, however, does not confirm to the emergency housing recipient that the payment for their stay was received. The recipient notifies the Council Authority or Public Authority that the hotel says they do not see the money yet. The Public Authority does not confirm the payment information to the benefit recipient; nor do they confirm the payment again to the hotel. So, there is a communication limbo or the dna's hope for an interception. The hotel employee says she does not care what happens to the housing recipient if he might die tomorrow night as she says again she does not see the money credited to his hotel room account bill. But she sees the money.  They have the money.    The only solution is as follows: Confirm the payment to the housing benefit recipient and the reference number with date of payment to the hotel as the benefit recipient gave his hotel room number to the Public Housing Authority.   Confirm again the same information to the hotel. Would the hotel continue to insist they did not receive it? Will they call the police on the benefit recipient?    If they do, you just charge the hotel manager with Reckless Endangerment.  
 It seems that the hotel is hoping for the benefit recipient to leave the hotel without knowledge that their stay was covered; and to also keep the money sent from the Public Authority.  The benefit recipient did leave in the end as they had no confirmation that their stay was covered for the month.  The hotel kept the money.  The Public Authority Harrow is now debiting the Hotel accounts to which payment was sent. Was it Premier at Wembley, Ramada at Barnet, Premier Inn at Hampstead and Travelodge at Farringdon and the Royal Scot Travelodge at King's Cross?  The money is now being sent to the Housing applicant who had to pay his own stay; to his Halifax account and this is in addition to his income benefit that it being held in the branch sundry account since December 2022 at the Edgeware Road branch and is being paid out as cash on the tenth of every month  after not releasing the payment into the customer's account in dereliction of the Crown duty for which the bank is paid an extra sum under contract with the government;  after being credited in to the branch on the 30th day  of the month when paid.   The Bank employee who has failed to fulfill the Crown duty in releasing all benefits payments says she believes the woman whose egg from which she was conceived has committed to getting her head cut off but she is convicted for all her crimes with some jail time. This employee also confirms that she does not release the payments sent to black people but leaves it in the bank branch sundry; the account the government pays the monies into as intended for various recipients.  But a fast payment from the government made directly to the recipient would avoid this chance of interception.  
This is also a case of reckless endangerment. Many people have been unable to maintain their family support payments, food, rents and other living costs.    

How is it that there is a bank in Canada collecting his benefit monies since he was 13 years old but he never got a statement. He opened an account with the bank more than once and they never notified him of the account details; an account opened by his father with his name but he did not know and nor was he ever told.