An unknown person's unilateral material change of some element of a home without consent isn't readily apparent as violence but it is violence. He is not a contractor hired to do the work. This includes Gonsales Leithland Barnwell and the person he hired to build the $400.00 gate without consent in some encroachment game, hoping to be chosen by beauty pageant convener as the more able decorator. He is to leave the house alone now. He is already convicted for trespass. This is no contest. You are done. It's just your ongoing confession before the audience. He has never owned, never bought but has been living with his girlfriend in her parent's house who are allegedly in Jamaica. His mother is dead, shot by him on Halloween night at her front door in 2015 and her parents left the country. He is now threatening to take the hotel because he thinks his wife's friend is the manager, casing them for where they live to put in his own employees. The issue here is not manhood in dealing with the squatter who is already convicted for trespass but violence. One family has been in continual legal occupation of the home since 1986; and now only one remains registered for such legal occupation. Warren is bringing tenants. You are interrupting. A relevant legal framework is the tort of nuisance and trespass. If your neighbour's unauthorized improvements significantly interfere with the use and enjoyment of your property (nuisance) or physically encroach upon it (trespass, mischief, criminal threatening and assault), you may have legal grounds to seek remedies such as damages or an injunction to stop the construction or require removal. You can call the police for the threatening behaviour. This is the issue. It's a threat with physical action. He is a madman who would do this. His name is Jamaican Barnwell Leithland Gonsales filled with pure hatred and rage at any graduate; 4 time high school drop out. He is polishing the old Honda Prelude in a storage locker who hired a kid to sit in the home after breaking in and then to throw Drano in the face of the owner when they come to the front door. What if he breaks in and dents the can of tuna in your cupboard but does nothing else? That is home invasion even if he has the key as building security. The perpetrators were already restrained from the property. He is already convicted for criminal trespass at the property sincethere is an owner or legal occupant. That is not at issue.

An unknown person's unilateral material change of some element of a home without consent isn't readily apparent as violence but it is violence.  He is not a contractor hired to do the work. This includes Gonsales Leithland Barnwell and the person he hired to build the $400.00 gate without consent in some encroachment game, hoping  to be chosen by beauty pageant convener as the more able decorator. He is to leave the house alone now. He is already convicted for trespass. This is no contest. You are done. It's just your ongoing confession before the audience.  

He has never owned, never bought but has been living with his girlfriend in her parent's house who are allegedly in Jamaica.  His mother is dead, shot by him on Halloween night at her front door in 2015 and her parents left the country. He is now threatening to take the hotel because he thinks his wife's friend is the manager, casing  them for where they live to put in his own employees.   The issue here is not manhood in dealing with the squatter who is already convicted for trespass but violence.  One family has been in continual legal occupation of the home since 1986; and now only one remains registered for such legal occupation.  Warren is bringing tenants.  You are interrupting.

A relevant legal framework is the tort of nuisance and trespass. If your neighbour's unauthorized improvements significantly interfere with the use and enjoyment of your property (nuisance) or physically encroach upon it (trespass, mischief, criminal threatening and assault), you may have legal grounds to seek remedies such as damages or an injunction to stop the construction or require removal. You can call the police  for the threatening behaviour. This is the issue.

 It's a threat with physical action. 

He is a madman who would do this.

 His name is Jamaican Barnwell Leithland Gonsales filled with pure hatred and rage at any graduate; 

4 time high school drop out.  He is polishing the old Honda Prelude in a storage locker 

who hired a kid to sit in the home after breaking in and then to throw

 Drano in the face of the owner when they come to the front door. 

What if he breaks in 

and dents the can of tuna in your cupboard 

but does nothing else? That is home invasion 

even if he has the key as building security.

 The perpetrators

were already restrained from the property. 

He is already convicted for criminal trespass

 at the property sincethere is an owner or legal occupant. 

That is not at issue. 

Legal Principles at Play 

• Trespass: 

  This occurs when someone enters your property without permission. If the improvement physically extends onto your property, it could constitute a trespass.
• Nuisance: 

  This tort involves a substantial and unreasonable interference with your use or enjoyment of your property. For example, a neighbour's construction causing excessive dust, noise, or even creating a structure that blocks your sunlight could be considered a nuisance.
• Property Rights: 

  You have a right to the peaceful enjoyment and protection of your property.

How to Approach the Situation

1. Gather Evidence:

   • Review Permits: Obtain the building permit and the architectural site plan submitted by your neighbour to the city to understand what was approved. 
   • Check Deeds and Surveys: Get copies of your property and your neighbour's property deeds and survey plans to understand boundary locations. 
2. Communicate and Document:

   • Talk to your neighbour: The first step is always to try and resolve the issue amicably. 
   • Keep records: Document all communications, conversations, and any photos or videos of the unauthorized improvements. 
3. Contact the Municipality:

   • File a complaint: You can file a complaint with your local municipality. A by-law inspector can investigate whether the construction complies with regulations. 
4. Seek Legal Advice:

   • Consult a lawyer: If you cannot resolve the issue through communication or bylaw enforcement, consult a real estate lawyer. They can advise you on your specific rights and the best course of action. 
   • Consider a civil action: A lawyer can help you file a civil claim for damages or seek an injunction to stop further unauthorized construction. 

Important Considerations

• Injunctions: 

  A court can issue an injunction to order the neighbour to stop construction or remove unauthorized structures. 
• Damages: 

  You may be able to claim monetary compensation for any harm or loss you have suffered due to the unauthorized work. 
• Local Bylaws: 

  Local bylaws regarding entry onto neighbour's land for repairs or for the extent of encroachment are critical.