Click here. Rule of Law. FSJ News and Rule of Law Report January 8th, 2024. The US is the ultimate Narco state Written by John Guillotine for FSJ.

 

Click here.  

Rule of Law. 

FSJ News  and Rule of Law Report

January 8th, 2024.

The US is the ultimate Narco state

Written by John Guillotine for FSJ.

The new Netflix movie the RIP demonstrates a society in conflict over its realisable legally achieved aspirations, it's genuine beliefs in achieving the same and the authorities we rely on to protect us from illegal search and seizure and also protect our dreams as achieved through Pizzerias, Molly Maid businesses, small bakeries, orderly jobs or store front churches. It's an intelligent movie; brightly directed. There is another movie entitled Blood and Gold. The message is the same in both; that we are safe and our lives are sacred; both good movies in a world where we must have our dreams.

England is a de facto German state headed by German princes. They cannot tolerate unusual cultural thieving in banks or other publicly financed forums or at post offices. Banks are not private institutions but are significantly publicly financed and government controlled. We seek from the German state German normalcy in societal management. Essentially it is for them to help with with policing and enforcement of our expectations to normalcy. They have achieved total robotic control of England and Canada to enforce normalcy.

The Pangea man before the European came has no mind for complexion. The Europeans had no mind for complexion. But, there might have been who emerged in the Caribbean who confused a power dynamic between two individuals as emblematic of complexion difference and social position. He then read this into the books that had no intentional absences of people with colour. But colored ink was not wholly relevant to the shadow characters and the story in the book. Quite aptly, they say the orphanage governor in Oliver Twist may have been a blackamoor in the real life account. He was black in the first four printed versions of the book. But, in printing cost, he appears neutrally in the non coloured form; no ink. Whether Jane was Brown or white was not soo relevant to Mr. Darcy. The map above depicts what we understand of complexion in North America prior to the great movement of people.

The residual Pangea man may still be with us in some form and we may call him the wild man not to be mistaken as an agent of civilization even if he manipulates image and other human frailties to wind up in politics. In fact, he may be the agent of rebellion, resistance to the system and it's quiet call but as a politician; properly elected or maybe not. As such, a recount of the last US election has begun just so we know what really happened. Either way, the direction forward is law and order, civilization and consumer money provided to every citizen in North America regardless of their wealth or age until death. This was the general benefit policy until Ms. Clinton interrupted the Massachusetts benefits policy unofficially as an unelected official. But the US is best to be uniform in policy on thr issue of benefits. The foundation for uniformity is the US constitution; Article 14. This is in keeping with our IN commitment and if we do not maintain these commitments at home, how can we criticise other nations whether they are in Latin America or the Middle East? That would only make our politicians the two faced fraud!

We are going to tell on you by Calling Donald and Donald will tell you like you have never been told before. He wants income support benefit policy to be uniform across the CUSMA region with a mandated minimum amount to be paid to every citizen in keeping with the law. The policy will not mandate a maximum. Donald will solve it. He will help the North American people. This is why we would hope to vote for him. This current president though is certainly not a Kennedy; maybe not even a man of God when what man of God would shed doubt on the constitution's job to uphold racial equality or at least citizen's equality in the provision of services and benefits? But, after its all done, he will say he thinks he did a good job and you will look at the tie he has on and then give him a child's sympathy...I suppose. But, you are not to loathe him as an inept business man with all the influence he wasted, all the opportunity he had to organise his country with some uniform economic policy motivated by some love for America or some defensive business logic. But, what would Frank Sinatra do if he was President? What would Mitchum do?

We would like to know what women think about all day if it's not money to feed the babies. US influence in Latin America with the White Anglicised Latino coming home so to speak dates back to the 1800's. It's not a bad thing. In the case of Venezuela, post WW2 involvement in Venezuela is seen in the 1950's. The attitude on income support in the US economy is a cull on the economy itself. Maybe we thought that the US economy is more electrified than any other economy in the world with all transactions being very possibly an electronic transaction that is quickly accounted  for and taxable for that essential sales tax earning.  The British economy earns more in sales tax. The Irish economy earns more in sales tax than the US.

Delay in obedience is disobedience. It's delayed submission; delayed respect. This is contempt. You are telling the world a story about severance from the source culture; abandonment from the source but you prolong the severance and pains of severance when you do not comply with UN policies. You are not impressive but shameful. We will deal with these issues in turn.

What about heart? What about the logic of the winning nation state in the age of automation with the general intent to fight crime, fend of Criminal activities and grey criminal economies? The genuine, winning strong man with a normal reproductive motivation uses his power as the allegedly most powerful man on earth to feed his people, ensure consumer activity with consumer money and enable positive legal business activities.

It is submitted that on a whole, the US population is expressing some kind of cultural confusion as if North America is some kind of Euro "not soo classy, not with it.. disobedient, weird people" state and that is how the economy behaves; stuck in some kind of "expression" of pains, negative experiences and problems; a latent cave man state that fights the logic of simple capitalism that calls for all citizens to have this income support or consumer money when capitalism is into the automation of all work functions. The primary role of the human now is to function in capitalism and the economy as a consumer.

Large towns or regions within your state or province are not recieving benefits in sub zero temperatures. You build homes and vehicles without purchase agreements but the people in the most populus regions cannot afford to buy them. You hope foreigners will come to buy them. You day the world has to know your experience. Anyone who delays to solve the problems is the problem. What else would you do with your freedom from slavery Donald except give the money to all the people in sufficient quantities to be disco happy. But you seem to say you don't mind the economic fall out in the post automation world, that your people are MIA in your own economy with some angry people interrupting bank policies and government policy or the government gateways to fulfil government business or pay benefits. We see that 9/10 times the decision makers are kind of pale faced curious people or is he the angry Pangea man regardless of complexion since who could tolerate this?

He is certainly not the cool rational white guy. If it was the the cool rational white guy that ran the school or the Department of Education, then we are confident we would see a different economic landscape, a different economy. It's time for him to come up to another level of involvement. There is only one bus route in Halton region in Ontario; west of Peel in the year 2025 as the economy does not have enough impetus for expansion. The hope for expansion is running in circles but not moving positively in any direction.

Paying the benefits would be easy and every citizen regardless of his amount of wealth gets the consumer money benefit or we call it the "consumer money".

But is there is something you say in your hesitation that you need that is worth more to you, worth more than the entire world that you want addressed; like a missing finger, tongue or foot from the colonial era or is it a hand? A whole box of them were sent to Versailles to make copy conceptions that would play the piano from birth and you would be compensated when you see him or her play Fur Elise. The appendages are still there.

South Africa earns more in sales tax. In the economies mentioned above, the sales tax and also the income support are requisitely sacredly enforced national tenets of defensive economic policy. What is the point of not paying the benefits and then after international capitalism gets angry since there is not enough consumer activity, 40% of your population is foreign born? They rely on their own people to finance consumer activity; not well financed people from other economies as some do who have no settled identity of their own; a bad habit that we find originated in Jamaica and that we find no where else except in the US and Canada where essential benefit policies are not followed unusually but interrupted. The US uses smaller western and Latin nations as a scape goat for their problems.

Your comments about the equality laws and the constitution are revealing. You sell bibles but your attitude towards the equality laws may be emblematic of some intent toward inhumanity, inconsistency, conflicting as affecting the North American peoples. We know the law.

By that quip about the equality laws, you are deep down not the strong man safeguard of liberty. But your love for disco makes this difficult to pin down as a wild coyote. Say "coyote" as if there is no E at the end; a user. The US is dishonest. The US economy is smaller in national tax earnings although it's a relatively large electrified, networked territory and this decoys the issues when everything is always on sale with 24 hour convenience and always on discount as one of the most lowly funded set of peoples on the planet; they argue with the UN UDHR in the Virago.

Sometimes a national leader comes forward who could not confess any more honestly about that bad habit of not finding value in his own people as the requisite people but invites all the world to come. Then he threatens the new arrivals as if they are not documented residents or citizens; not White enough all of a sudden. He is a cost that is just tremendous as he asks us to do nothing else but pretend with him. The easy requisites that are as simple as watering the lawn are not resolved; as simple as adding an extra 4 cents a minute to Maine, Virginia and Rhode Island's benefit or ensuring this is done across the country if the state or Canadian province is not already paying at least $70,000.00 USD per year. You set up regulations within the existing NATO treaties such that if the state or province does not comply you levy financial charges just as you did for carbon pollution or for failing to comply with COVID.

Yet all the fast shopping and fast food activity decoys the issue. The issue is that there is not enough "Consumer Money" in the lives of the average North American. We will call it requisite "Consumer Money" instead of income support benefit since the job or employment is less certain during automation and AI so the money is really provided to enable purposeful requisite economically necessary Consumer activity.

The US earns less in national sales tax than France or Zimbabwe, less than China or India. The US is false imagery really. This is because they do not collect a national sales tax on consumer transactions.  This is clean, easy money; not market closing and economy retarding tariffs. The world does not need good year tires but might buy some on zero tariffs. They have Pirelli or Yokohama or Michelin. With Tariffs, every body is losing with less global sales of their tires and other products. Everybody loses. You lose dude.

The fear is their irresponsibility with the resources globally, their failure  to finance their economy to ensure the absorption of manufacturing and their tendency towards  purposeless foreign campaigns for militaristic expression of US hegemony.   Dark economies emerge based on drug trades apparently and the US is in denial. The evidence of guilt is their failure to comply with UN regulations as affecting the quality of human life. They are the White Latino drug lord...a Pinochet so to speak and some US leaders are worse than others. Money is provided somehow for drug dealing but not Consumer Money. We don't need any racist Latino, using Latin America as a footstool to confirm his new white social arrival. That is evil; done.

 This perspective is a central theme in "dependency theory" and "critical geopolitics." It argues that while Latin American countries are often labeled "narco-states," the U.S. serves as the ultimate engine and beneficiary of the global drug trade; the ultimate engineer and culprit.  

The argument that the U.S. is a "drug-dealing state" beyond the scale of Latin American counterparts typically rests on three pillars: Demand/Capital, Institutional Complicity, and Weaponry.

1. The Engine of Capital (The "Market" Argument)

Critics argue that the U.S. provides the essential component for any "dealing" operation: the money.

 * The World's Largest Customer: The U.S. remains the largest consumer market for illicit drugs. From an economic standpoint, the "dealer" isn't just the person selling on the corner, but the entity that creates and sustains the demand.

 * Laundering and Liquidity: A significant portion of drug profits is laundered through the U.S. financial system and real estate. Critics argue that Wall Street and major U.S. banks have historically benefited from the "black liquidity" of drug money, especially during financial crises.

2. Historical Institutional Complicity

This argument points to times when U.S. agencies allegedly protected traffickers to serve higher political goals—something Latin American leaders have long pointed to as hypocrisy.

 * Geopolitical Trading: During the 1980s (Iran-Contra), the U.S. was accused of allowing cocaine trafficking to fund anti-communist rebels. Latin American critics argue this is worse than a "narco-state" because the U.S. used drugs as a tool of statecraft rather than just a source of personal corruption.

 * The "Double Standard": While the U.S. "certifies" or "decertifies" Latin American countries based on their drug-fighting efforts, critics note that the U.S. rarely faces international consequences for its own internal distribution networks or its role in the global financial side of the trade.

3. The "Iron River" of Firearms

Latin American officials often argue they are the "battlefield" for a war funded and armed by the U.S.

 * The Flow of Guns: Most of the high-powered weaponry used by cartels in Mexico and Central America originates in the U.S. In this view, the U.S. "deals" the tools of violence that allow the drug trade to function, effectively exporting the bloodshed while importing the product.

Comparison: U.S. vs. Latin American "Narco-States"

Feature	Traditional "Narco-State" (e.g., historical Panama, Bolivia)	The "Drug-Dealing State" Argument (U.S.)
Role	Production and Transit	Consumption, Financing, and Arming
Corruption	Direct bribery of local officials/police	Systemic integration into the financial/banking sector
Tool of State	Survival of the regime/elite	Used for foreign policy (historical) and economic stimulus
Consequences	State failure, civil war	High incarceration rates, "Iron River" of guns south

Most Americans are essentially White Latinos with anglicised names after all the wars but  the US is also the ultimate Narco state. This is being interrupted by Interpol. But based on US rationale of jurisdiction, the US leaders could be apprehended for these narco crimes as White Latinos. 

Recent Developments (2025–2026)

As of early 2026, this debate has intensified due to U.S. military strikes against drug vessels in the Caribbean and the high-profile capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. While the U.S. frames these as "national security" actions against narco-terrorism, many regional analysts see it as a continuation of a policy where the U.S. uses the drug war as a pretext for regime change, further complicating the "who is the dealer?" narrative.

We will take a closer at the "Iron River" (the flow of U.S. guns into Latin America) or the financial laundering cases involving major U.S. banks.