It reads, "I don't really know if I respect the REGINA or REX to do what the law says regarding benefits if his wife may not be a German Royal but she is certainly an English Royal in her ancestry and in the dichotomy between English and German, we say she feels a bit common"-From the diaries of Churchill in 1936 as read by Thatcher in 1983." What did Thatcher do with the bus driver's benefits except say that if he has a job and his savings, she does not really want to pay the benefit since they have a job or she is not really sure what she wants. Then in her last reports as of 1990, she said she made a mistake; that they should get the benefits and does not want the banks holding the funds. It looks like the funds were sent anyway in spite of Thatcher's lack of reverence and the benefit funds are still held; but not paid. Thatcher, like Churchill, was a Jamaiscotian. England is divided on these little issues but the King wants the benefit paid. He is the UN. The Prime Minister must agree with the King and his UN. Was Thatcher or Churchill part Huguenot? The furniture in the government is top notch Scandinavian chic but the economy or the government function therein as to benefits is like Port Royal. It seems the benefits were not paid to the bank employees. They may sometimes choose a hostage at the behest of a local hegemon to make a point when the cab or taxi driver with over £100,000 pounds also is not getting his benefits. The law has not changed. The benefits are to be too all. They are supposed to get their benefits. So, when does a bank employee choose not to release his own benefits to credit his account? There is scheme here but for how long and to what end? It's a scheme that we saw before when somehow during a King or soon to be mong enjoying his family, we see a Cray( Haitian Jamaican anxious wannabe the king murderous orphan breed) interruption. This time, it can be solved electronically and who would make a deal with a financial terrorist and former politician who did not do his job and held the economy hostage in some ancestral "hold him Joe" game? The game is over. The dastardly scheme began on his wedding day. If it was your job as a bank employee or government staffer, wouldn't you be terrified to ensure the REX or REGINA is respected and ensure the benefits are paid? I would be terrified and do as the system says before I am done for wire fraud, embezzlement or joint venture. The truth of England is that there will be a Norwegian, a China man, a Scandinavian, a South African, an American and a West Indian or a Celt Gaelic in the population along with a Canadian but we must all have the same expectations of ourselves not only on the soccer field but also in the government. It must work and if it does not, they are going to start using heavy handed measures. The funds sent as benefits must be paid; no matter how late.

 It reads, "I don't really know if I respect the REGINA or REX to do what the law says regarding benefits if his wife may not be a German Royal but she is certainly an English Royal in her ancestry and in the dichotomy between English and German, we say she feels a bit common"-From the diaries of Churchill in 1936 as read by Thatcher in 1983."

 What did Thatcher do with the bus driver's benefits except say that if he has a job and his savings, she does not really want to pay the benefit since they have a job or she is not really sure what she wants. Then in her last reports as of 1990, she said she made a mistake; that they should get the benefits and does not want the banks holding the funds.  It looks like the funds were sent anyway in spite of Thatcher's lack of reverence and the benefit funds are still held; but not paid.  Thatcher, like Churchill,  was a Jamaiscotian.  England is divided on these little issues but the King wants the benefit paid. He is the UN.  The Prime Minister must agree with the King and his UN.  Was Thatcher or Churchill part Huguenot? 

The furniture in the government is top notch Scandinavian chic but the economy or the government  function therein as to benefits is like Port Royal.  It seems the benefits were not paid to the bank employees.  They may sometimes choose a hostage at the behest of a local hegemon to make a point when the cab or taxi  driver with over £100,000 pounds also is not getting his benefits. The law has not changed. The benefits are to be too all. They are supposed to get their benefits. So, when does a bank employee choose not to release his own benefits to credit his account? There is scheme here but for how long and to what end? It's a scheme that we saw before when somehow during a King or soon to be mong enjoying his family, we see a Cray( Haitian Jamaican anxious wannabe the king murderous orphan breed) interruption.  This time, it can be solved electronically and who would make a deal with a financial terrorist and former politician who did not do his job and held the economy hostage in some ancestral "hold him Joe" game?  The game is over. The dastardly scheme began on his wedding day. 

If it was your job as a bank employee or government staffer, wouldn't you be terrified to ensure the REX or REGINA is respected and ensure the benefits are paid?  

I would be terrified and do as the system says before I am done for wire fraud, embezzlement or joint venture.  

The truth of England is that there will be a Norwegian, a China man, a Scandinavian, a South African, an American and a West Indian or a Celt Gaelic in the population along with a Canadian but we must all have the same expectations of ourselves not only on the soccer field but also in the government. It must work and if it does not, they are going to start using heavy handed measures.  The funds sent as benefits must be paid; no matter how late.