Would generally be illegal to serve a dish simply called "Animal" without further clarification in a pub or restaurant due to food safety and consumer protection laws. Legal Requirements for Menu Naming Species Identification: In many jurisdictions, including Canada and the United Kingdom, meat products must be described by their commonly known animal species. For example, a label or menu must specify if the meat is beef, pork, or chicken.

 Would generally be illegal to serve a dish simply called "Animal" without further clarification in a pub or restaurant due to food safety and consumer protection laws.

Legal Requirements for Menu Naming

• Species Identification: In many jurisdictions, including Canada and the United Kingdom, meat products must be described by their commonly known animal species. For example, a label or menu must specify if the meat is beef, pork, or chicken.
• Truthful and Not Misleading: Under regulations like those from the USDA and Health Canada, food names must be truthful and not misleading. Using a generic term like "animal" could be considered misleading as it fails to inform the consumer what they are actually consuming.
• Common Name Standards: If a food does not have a prescribed name, a descriptive name that accurately identifies the food in simple and direct terms must be used to allow for informed purchasing decisions.
• Specific Exclusions: Some types of meat, such as dog or cat meat, are explicitly banned for commercial sale and human consumption in many countries, including the US (under the Dog and Cat Meat Trade Prohibition Act) and the UK. 

Potential Consequences

• Licensing Risks: Deliberately obscuring what is in a meal or "spiking" food with undisclosed animal products can lead to investigations by local health authorities and potentially the loss of a business license.
• Equality and Beliefs: In some regions, failing to accurately describe animal products could breach laws like the UK's Equality Act 2010, which protects dietary beliefs like veganism. 
•