In that European country, we see the idolatry of one's singular opinion to decide things when it came to designing a refugee shelter pursuant to European laws. He input a hydrogen chloride system for the building that is causing an environmental contamination. It's not a water additive. It's a gas that is flowing through the pipes and drains through the whole building. It fails all environmental impact assessments. he use of nuclear installations for electric power fails environmental impact assessments. We have seen the consequences. We are annoyed with the results but the idea manifests unabated, killing the fish in the local canal or estuary. The nuclear ion leached into the water supply and is now in the food and drinks and coffees. Is it the blue top milk? It used to be whatever milk you liked. Now it's usually the green top milk if you intend to live and then you put a little tuna water in it from the tuna fish can. Then there is now the Gold top unpasteurised milk that gives you a funny toe yet it seems pretty nuked, chemically hot. But it tastes fatty boom boom but you get cooked by it. In another country the guy in the idolatry of his opinion cuts the benefits for the local population and he sees that the landscape has changed drastically; less regular and usual white Anglos running the chippy, less of everything that was once usual in the homes and buildings. Diversity is not the problem since that would always increase as ignorance dissipates. It is just that there was an interruption in regular, consistent benefits. We enjoy the diversity in food and services but we need the benefits to pay for the food and services. The green grasshopper is now grey. The African or the Black was the first to design tables and chairs. He was the first to design income support. But see the Black in the West Indies is the last to agree to it's ubiquitous necessity. We observe that we are seeing there is an issue with responses and solutions to situations. You seem to be choosing cannibalism Vs cooperation . You got to pay $5.00 per property on 7 homes but you refused to pay. You are now noted as an illegal in all homes. You have a chance to resolve this. But initially you should have paid the $5.00 per day on all 7 homes, and rent them to someone for the market rent of $3700.00 per month on all 7 homes. Live in one of them if you want. So you earn $3695.00 per home. Get a friend to help you. Now you owe $10000.00 per home in fines. You should pay the fine and tent the home. Set up a deal for the tenant to pay you the $10,000.00 so you pay the rent or they pay for you to the person you owe and they can move in with that as rent paid up front for 3 months. On the fourth month, they pay you directly the market rent and you still pay the guy you owe the $5.00 a day. But he said he will accept the $10000.00 as final payment. We may all be frogs in essence but today we also have feelings and emotions; all of us. For our feelings and mutual contentedness, we have designed buildings and libraries for our satisfaction; for our feelings. But what about the money and benefits? What is going on? What has happened for our satisfaction and feelings? The decision maker is the Court. They have already decided. We are not waiting for politicians to agree. The cov servants are obligated to implement systems that abide by the law. The politicians can share the input of the public they serve with representation. It is not that every aspect of public lived experience is designed by and decided by the politician. They come and go. Many essentials are decided by civil servants who are in the portfolio to make decisions.

 In that European country, we see the idolatry of one's singular opinion to decide things  when it came to designing a refugee shelter pursuant to European laws.      He input a hydrogen chloride system for the building that is causing an environmental contamination. It's not a water additive. It's a gas that is flowing through the pipes and drains through the whole building.  It fails all environmental impact assessments.  

he use of nuclear installations for  electric power fails environmental impact assessments. We have seen the consequences. We are annoyed with  the results  but the idea manifests unabated, killing the fish in the local canal or estuary.  

The nuclear ion leached into the water supply and is now in the food and drinks and coffees.  Is it the blue top milk? It used to be whatever milk you liked. Now it's usually the green top milk if you intend to live and then you put a little tuna water in it from the tuna fish can.  Then there is now the Gold top unpasteurised milk that gives you a funny toe yet it seems pretty nuked, chemically hot. But it tastes fatty boom boom but you get cooked by it. 

In another country the guy in the idolatry of his opinion cuts the benefits for the local population and he sees that the landscape has changed drastically; less regular and usual white Anglos running the chippy, less of everything that was once usual in the homes and buildings. Diversity is not the problem since that would always increase as ignorance dissipates.  It is just that there was an interruption in regular, consistent benefits. We enjoy the diversity in food and services but we need the benefits to pay for the food and services.

The green grasshopper is now grey.     The African or the Black was the first to design tables and chairs. He was the first to design income support. But see the Black in the West Indies  is the last to agree to it's ubiquitous necessity.  We observe that we are seeing there is an issue with   responses and solutions to situations.  You seem to be choosing cannibalism Vs cooperation . You got to pay $5.00 per property on 7 homes but you refused to pay.  You are now noted as an illegal in all homes. You have a chance to resolve this. But  initially you should have paid the $5.00 per day on all 7 homes, and rent them to someone for the market rent of $3700.00 per month on all 7 homes.   Live in one of them if you want.  So you earn $3695.00 per home. Get a friend to help you. Now you owe $10000.00 per home in fines.  You should pay the fine and tent the home. Set up a deal for the tenant to pay you the $10,000.00  so you pay the rent or they pay  for you to the person you owe and they can move in with that as rent paid up front for 3 months. On the fourth month, they pay you directly the market rent and you still pay the guy you owe the $5.00 a day. But he said he will accept the $10000.00 as final payment.  

We may all be frogs in essence but today we also have feelings and emotions; all of us. For our  feelings and mutual contentedness, we have designed buildings and libraries for our satisfaction; for our feelings.  But what about the money and benefits? What is going on? What has happened for our satisfaction, emotions and feelings?  

The decision maker is the Court. They have already decided. We are not waiting for politicians to agree. The cov servants are obligated to implement systems that abide by the law. 

The politicians can share the input of the public they serve with representation. 

It is not that every aspect of public lived experience is designed by and decided by the politician.  They come and go. Many essentials are decided by civil servants who are in the portfolio to make decisions.