A fresh look at R. v. AG(2000) SCC with R. v. King(1962) SCC demonstrates that the appeal in situations involving oath vs. oath jurisprudence must rest on that very onus the Crown is unable to discharge while the Judge or Jury in the trial at first instance is not obligated to write your submissions or make them for you in closing argument. This is not simple and it cannot be taught for free by way of this or any website since maybe the accused should understand why a trial was his best option in addressing the allegations and the Judge knows why he made a finding of guilt along with the Jury. In oath vs. oath jurisprudence, The Rv. W(D) analysis by the Court is not immediately satisfied and the judgement to favor the complainant over the accused sits only on a chance or probability with her sworn oath to believed or maybe doubted. But, both parties swore an oath before the honourable Court. It seems the Courts only find those persons guilty based on all of the evidence within the Crown's duty to prove it's case. Any Appeal with submissions may succeed but you cannot expect that the Appellate Court must follow your position. They must follow the law. But, it can only work in certain fact scenarios. Let us review your matter and draft your appeal. Email: info.angelronan@mail.com.

A fresh look at R.  v. AG(2000) SCC with  R. v. King(1962) SCC demonstrates that the appeal in situations involving oath vs. oath jurisprudence must rest on that  very onus the Crown is unable to discharge while the Judge or Jury in the trial at first instance is not obligated to write your submissions or make them for you in closing argument. This is not simple and it cannot be taught for free by way of this or any website since maybe the accused should understand why a trial was his best option in addressing the allegations and the Judge knows why he made a finding of guilt along with the Jury.    In oath vs. oath jurisprudence, The  Rv. W(D) analysis by the Court is not  immediately satisfied  and the judgement to favor the complainant over the accused  sits only on a chance or probability with her sworn oath to believed or maybe doubted.  But, both parties swore an oath before the honourable Court.   It seems the Courts only find those persons guilty based on all of the evidence within the Crown's duty to prove it's case.  Any Appeal with submissions may  succeed but you cannot expect that the Appellate Court must follow your position. They must follow the law.   But, it can only work in certain fact scenarios.      Let us review your matter and draft your appeal.  Email: info.angelronan@mail.com.