Can a quasi governmental body without the power of arrest violate your s.7 charter rights contrary to their mandate to regulate a profession? The answer is yes. The answer is "yes" because anybody can knowingly or recklessly break the law. Yet, their mandate is not an alibi. The violation is an offense; a criminal offence. The mandate is to regulate a profession and no Law is to be broken to achieve this end. Regulating roads are more complicated and no laws need to be broken to regulate roads. The real issue here with what is going on is how we regulate vermin emotions since not all white people think like this vermin that should not be involved in professional work that challenges their ability to believe in human equality and capability regardless of race. Now why shouldn't a Black guy with mixEd race ancestry or with pure Samoan ancestry running a Law firm and being compensated for mistreatment under the law? How is white honored of he is not compensated? Now, if white is a good Santa Claus and a good sermon with a good choir and a good pastor with a 30 percent refugee congregation that he helps at refugee hearings as a good white man with some Haitian ancestry , when does white say it can't believe it's own intelligence eh Marwen? The RCMP has been found in violation of s.7 and s.8 when the procedures that govern their work is not followed by employees who my have hoped to continue their work with the investigation against the subject and there is no quasi governmental body funded by the government claiming to be self-regulating a profession that has immunity above and beyond the power of the constable services and the legislature dedicated to serve and protect. False affidavits as to service of documents and as to communicating information by email although the wrong email address was used admittedly on the record amounts to criminal MISFEASANCE in public office and a deliberate breach of S.7 and an interference with the professional's right to enjoy employment under the true, North,strong and free laws of a UN charter nation.

Can a quasi governmental body without the power of arrest violate your s.7 charter rights contrary to their mandate to regulate a profession? The answer is yes. The answer is "yes" because anybody can knowingly or recklessly break the law.  Yet, their mandate is not an alibi. The violation is an offense; a criminal offence. The mandate is to regulate a profession and no Law is to be broken to achieve this end. Regulating roads are more complicated and no laws need to be broken to regulate roads. The real issue here with what is going on is how we regulate vermin  emotions since not all white people think like this  vermin that should not be involved in professional work that challenges their ability to believe in human equality and capability regardless of race.  Now why shouldn't a Black guy with mixEd race ancestry or with  pure Samoan ancestry  running  a Law firm and being  compensated for mistreatment  under the law? How is white honored of he is not compensated?  Now, if white is a good Santa Claus and a good sermon with a good choir  and a good pastor with a 30 percent refugee congregation that he helps at refugee hearings as a good white man with some Haitian ancestry , when does white say it can't believe it's own intelligence eh Marwen? The RCMP has been found in violation of s.7 and s.8 when the procedures that govern their work is not followed by employees who my have hoped to continue their work with the investigation  against the subject and there is no quasi governmental body funded by the government claiming to be self-regulating a profession that has immunity above and beyond the power of the constable services and the legislature  dedicated to serve and protect. False affidavits as to service of documents and as to communicating information by email although the wrong email address was used admittedly on the record  amounts to criminal MISFEASANCE in public office  and a deliberate breach of S.7 and an interference with the professional's right to enjoy employment under the true, North,strong and free laws of  a UN charter nation. 

Comments