A new tort exam question examines whether a student can identify the simplest way of resolving a question. It is a Medical malpractice case based on Boletho vs. Hackney Area Health Authority except in this case, the tort victim was a pregnant woman and the question is whether the unborn child can also be a litigant. Presumably all legal professionals can answer the question if they have enough time and breadth of soul with basic income supporting their Cad 200000.00 Audi A9 car finance since basic income is not the end of finance but it's beginning when the average person usually reaches to new heights of consumer bliss as expected so we have more transactions involving finance per minute. If the woman is pregnant, how many claimant litigants do we have? If the lawyer for the claimant includes the unborn child as a litigant, can he kill the Legal Analyst who, in 2008, commented on the fact that the unborn child cannot be a litigant as the unborn child is not a legal person? He or she is unborn, not registrable as a citizen and remains in the realm of possibility. This was after the case was appealed on the issue of the Doctor's lack of negligence concerning his advice to the mother? Please answer. You have 40 minutes to answer the question.

A new tort exam question examines whether a student can identify the simplest way of resolving a question.  It is a Medical malpractice case based on Boletho vs. Hackney Area Health Authority except in this case, the tort victim was a pregnant woman and the question is whether the unborn child can also be a litigant. Presumably all legal professionals can answer the question if they have enough time and breadth of soul with basic income supporting their Cad 200000.00 Audi A9 car finance since basic income is not the end of finance but it's beginning when the average person usually reaches to new heights of consumer bliss as expected so we have more transactions involving finance per minute. If the woman is pregnant, how many  claimant litigants do we have? If the lawyer for the claimant includes the unborn child as a litigant, can he kill the Legal Analyst who, in 2008,  commented on the fact that the unborn child cannot be a litigant as the unborn child is not a legal person?  He or she is unborn,  not registrable as a citizen and remains in the realm of possibility.   This was after the case  was appealed on the issue of the Doctor's lack of negligence concerning his advice to the mother? Please answer. You have 40 minutes to answer the question.