Click here. It's not like he is trying to win a case as he has already won a few in both Civil and Criminal Court and this dates back to 2010. In one rather complicated scenario, The client did not knowingly remain in possession of a vehicle while intoxicated since he drank too much sugary orange juice and there was a s.8 violation. In addition, the people with whom he was travelling could not have been in possession of narcotics found in the vehicle knowingly as driven by people who offered a ride home in the rain from the Law School where his transsexual was arrested for impersonating a Medical Graduate and for teaching medical science at the University of London. The vehicle was a rental. The issue is that the s.8 violation along with no reasonable and probable grounds as to the vehicle being stolen and the lack of consumption of actual alcohol meant that no offense was committed as there was no intent to be intoxicated and it is not a strict liability offense. Call for a consultation.
The issue is that the s.8 violation along with no reasonable and probable grounds as to the vehicle being stolen and the lack of consumption of actual alcohol meant that no offense was committed as there was no intent to be intoxicated and it is not a strict liability offense. Call for a consultation.

Comments
Post a Comment