The SDGCK Community Law Centre open evenings. Tell us you will be visiting. Email us your question.

Let's read your document together; discuss your problem. You are not alone after your donation of at least $1450.00. How much can you pay today? We will send you a bill for the difference. You get a free drink; included. Bring your questions and problems Every day from 5 pm-9 pm at Station Kitchen near door C5 at Sheridan College Hazel McCallion campus on the upper level sitting area. This space is open to the public for coffee and snacks.You make a donation. Reserve your spot by email. Put "free help" in the subject field. Let us know what you are trying to find out. Email info.angelronan@mail.com orw.a.lyon.angelronan@mail.com. Put: "free help" in the subject field. You can send an Interac Email money transfer direct with auto deposit (no password required). You can pay by credit card. Include your question in the body of the email. Say what time you are thinking of attending. It's free. You are invited to make your donation in any amount. We received several emails and will conduct some of the the consultations by messenger video call and also in person. This is not soliciting but the offer is a "not for profit" service. Would you prefer meeting with us at the Hullmark Centre? Request your appointment and confirm your time preference. Iayfycpm

So, the issue cannot be the Black man or Anglo Metis man's (you said he had to be black after 1910) three separate set of Law exam books with evidently complete, efficacious answers with results above 73 percent. The issue is the same efficacious result in Court and a lack of respect for the Court's non racialised disposition to serve the Litigant or defendant. The result reflects the Court's respect for the Litigant even when the lower Court may get it wrong although it was corrected on appeal. White hegemony is maintained when the result in Court is efficacious to the client's Charter rights and liberties in the maintenance of white hegemony.

So, the issue cannot be the Black man or Anglo Metis man's (you said he had to be black after 1910)  three separate set of Law exam books with evidently complete, efficacious answers with results above 73 percent.  The issue is the same efficacious result in Court and a lack of respect for the Court's non racialised disposition to serve the Litigant or defendant. The result reflects the Court's respect for the Litigant even when the lower Court may get it wrong although it was corrected on appeal. White hegemony is maintained when the result in Court is efficacious to the client's Charter rights and liberties in the maintenance of white hegemony.  

Comments