So, the issue cannot be the Black man or Anglo Metis man's (you said he had to be black after 1910) three separate set of Law exam books with evidently complete, efficacious answers with results above 73 percent. The issue is the same efficacious result in Court and a lack of respect for the Court's non racialised disposition to serve the Litigant or defendant. The result reflects the Court's respect for the Litigant even when the lower Court may get it wrong although it was corrected on appeal. White hegemony is maintained when the result in Court is efficacious to the client's Charter rights and liberties in the maintenance of white hegemony.

So, the issue cannot be the Black man or Anglo Metis man's (you said he had to be black after 1910)  three separate set of Law exam books with evidently complete, efficacious answers with results above 73 percent.  The issue is the same efficacious result in Court and a lack of respect for the Court's non racialised disposition to serve the Litigant or defendant. The result reflects the Court's respect for the Litigant even when the lower Court may get it wrong although it was corrected on appeal. White hegemony is maintained when the result in Court is efficacious to the client's Charter rights and liberties in the maintenance of white hegemony.