In the year 1999, Officers with Manchester England's Police Force Traffic Services unit say they identified a man believed to be driving a motorcycle that struck the boy in the east end Sunday afternoon before fleeing the scene. The 31-year-old man, whose name was not released, is now charged with leaving an accident scene causing bodily harm, driving with an improper license and operating a vehicle without insurance. He was on his way to help his girlfriend plagiarize essays she hoped to use at Manchester University to graduate in an LL.B program. She was convicted for plagiarism, theft of property and deception offenses. It is Law School. You used undergrad essays and also first year law school essays belonging to one really nice dude. You should not be using other people's work. Are you just plain stupid; weird, indictable? Do not call for coffee and do not tell me all about it. The short answer is that if the vehicle is identified at the time of the accident when the accident is reported to police with licence plate numbers by more than one eye witness, then the case is closed. You know what vehicle was involved but with an improper license, is the vehicle stolen? Are you arresting the owner of the vehicle or who stole and who drove the vehicle? You intend to arrest who drove the vehicle; not the owner necessarily as the vehicle might be stolen. If the license plate is improper, how can you identify the actual owner? All you have is a vehicle. It was reported stolen sometime ago. But, the driver had a helmet on and goggles. But, there was sweat on the throttle and it could help if the vehicle could be apprehended, if not the driver, immediately to ensure continuity with the accident that took place allegedly since what if someone else drove the vehicle after the accident took place? Click here.

In the year 1999, Officers with Manchester England's  Police  Force Traffic Services unit say they identified a man believed to be driving a motorcycle that struck the boy in the east end Sunday afternoon before fleeing the scene.

The 31-year-old man, whose name was not released, is now charged with leaving an accident scene causing bodily harm, driving with an improper license and operating a vehicle without insurance.  He was on his way to help his girlfriend plagiarize essays she hoped to use at Manchester University to graduate in an LL.B program.  She was convicted for plagiarism, theft of property and deception offenses. It is Law School. You used undergrad essays and also first year law school essays belonging to one really nice dude.   You should not be using other people's work.  Are you just plain stupid; weird, indictable? Do not call for coffee and do not tell me all about it.  

The short answer is that if the vehicle is identified at the time of the accident when the accident is reported to police  with licence plate numbers by more than one eye witness, then the case is closed. You know what vehicle was involved but with an improper license, is the vehicle stolen? Are you arresting the owner of the vehicle or who stole and who drove the vehicle? You intend to arrest who drove the vehicle; not the owner necessarily as the vehicle might be stolen. If the license plate is improper, how can you identify the actual owner? All you have is a vehicle.  It was reported stolen sometime ago. But, the driver had a helmet on and goggles. But, there was sweat on the throttle and it could help if the vehicle could be apprehended, if not the driver, immediately to ensure continuity with the accident that took place allegedly since what if someone else drove the vehicle after the accident took place?   If you find the vehicle hours later, you have doubt and cannot be sure the last and most immediate  driver is the same  driver who committed the offence.  The commission of the offence can be established with the 911 reports from eye witnesses as contemporaneous with the offence that identifies the vehicle with the same improper  plates.  If not, then if the witnesses can not be sure, then the officer cannot be sure and if the officer cannot be sure, how can the Crown prove their case? The Court has something to think about. Maybe Watson from IBM can help. Maybe the real  guilty party pulled over and got some Wall's ice cream and never left the scene really and was only a few doors up da road! The accused who is now in Court quite possibly has no idea what happened.  Drivers licenses and insurance coverage can be proven with contractual evidence available to the accused as a matter of right to  confirm a valid contract of insurance was in place at the time of the accident if they have insurance.
Our condolences are shared with the family whose 75 year old son was injured and it is hoped that the actual perpetrators are apprehended for leaving the scene of the accident.
The other issue is whether the pedestrian has been charged with unlawfully entering the roadway, causing an accident; right Aditomotra?

A Tort case may ensue with insurance companies involved.  We can help.  The case for the Tort file involves  contributory negligence.
What duty of care is owed to a pedestrian who enters a roadway illegally by jumping off a bridge or walking between parked cars on the High  Street in Leicester just as he is hit by on coming traffic?

The Angel Ronan Boxes are with a mixed race family in Caledon. Great Balls of Scott!!


That will be $350.00 for your Angel Ronan Lex Scripta(TM)  99.9 percent Relevant Research Report.

The entire situation  may not be so simple.   To review the actual disclosure from Manchester and attend Court, that will be $3500.00.

Meet Warren A. Lyon in person whether or not you have a legal problem. You might just have a question. Buy your own coffee.

Email: w.a.lyon.angelronan@mail.com
Tel: 1-914-395-9968.