There is no abuse of power. The truth is that maybe the President's intention was national security to find out what any son of a Democrat was doing in the Ukraine since, after wikileaks, there is context and asking a foreign police service what they were doing in furtherance of the mandate of the national security services quite normal. POTUS, as commander in chief, is at the head of all national security services and requesting your NATO colleagues for assistance to confirm what these Democrats are doing is quite normal when the Secretary of State in the previous administration is subject to indictment under the Espionage Act 1917. Apparently, Bidden set the whole thing in motion and had his son's steal Clinton's phones and left the phones in the open. The question is why Hunted Bidden gave the Ukrainian government $300,000.00. They may have also transmitted some of the wikileaks information to ensure she could not be a viable candidate again, giving Bidden a chance to run. The title "Commander In Chief" carries the order of police chief; in fact ot carries authority equal to a General and the power to initiate investigations on any citizen. Bidden is a citizen first and foremost. His political aspirations or his rivalries as a mere Democratic party member and potential candidate do not amount to immunity from investigation or prosecution. Where is there an abuse of power if anyone with due authority asks questions of a national ally to confirm what unusual, suspicious activity may have taken place with the Bidden's giving the Ukrainian's unusual large cash payments? There is also a rumor that they were trying buy asylum after a planned assassination of the VP and the President to make Pelozi President. It's childish but so is this continued frenzy toward an impeachment with falsified allegations that have not been proven or substantiated by the FBI. . Before we worry about witnesses, you need to know the standard of proof in the forum you are entering. It is proof beyond a reasonable doubt as you are dealing with allegations involving High Crimes. Courts involving allegations with respect to Crimes operate on a standard of proof involving proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Maybe Narnia Pelofi's teeth were falling out or maybe it did look like it. You need evidence to pursue an impeachment. Without evidence, it is a fraud on the senate, a fraud on the Court. The truth is that maybe his intention was national security to find out what any son of a Democrat was doing in the Ukraine since, after wikileaks, there is context and asking a foreign police service what they were doing in furtherance of the mandate of the national security services quite normal. POTUS, as commander in chief, is at the head of all national security services and requesting your NATO colleagues for assistance to confirm what these Democrats are doing is quite normal when the Secretary of State in the previous administration is subject to indictment under the Espionage Act 1917. Apparently, Bidden set the whole thing in motion and had his son's steal phones and left the phones in the open. The question is why Hunted Bidden gave the Ukrainian government $300,000.00. They may have also transmitted some of the wikileaks information to ensure she could not be a viable candidate again, giving Bidden a chance to run. The title "Commander In Chief" carries the order of police chief; in fact ot carries authority equal to a General and the power to initiate investigations on any citizen. Bidden is a citizen first and foremost. His political aspirations or his rivalries as a mere Democratic party member and potential candidate do not amount to immunity from investigation or prosecution. Where is there an abuse of power if anyone with due authority asks questions of a national ally to confirm what unusual, suspicious activity may have taken place with the Bidden's giving the Ukrainian's unusual large cash payments. There is also a rumor that they were trying buy asylum after a planned assassination of the VP and the President to make Pelozi President. It's childish but so is this continued frenzy toward an impeachment with falsified allegations that have not been proven or substantiated by the FBI.

There is no abuse of power.   The truth is that maybe the President's intention was national security to find out what any son of a Democrat was doing in the Ukraine since, after wikileaks, there is context and asking a foreign police service what they were doing in furtherance of the mandate of the national security services quite normal.  POTUS, as commander in chief, is at the head of all national security services and requesting your NATO colleagues for assistance to confirm what these Democrats  are doing is  quite normal when the Secretary of State in the previous administration is subject to indictment under the Espionage Act 1917.  Apparently, Bidden set the whole thing  in motion  and had his son's steal Clinton's phones and left the phones in the open. The question is why Hunted Bidden gave the Ukrainian government  $300,000.00.   They may have also transmitted some of the wikileaks  information to ensure she could not be a viable candidate again, giving Bidden a chance to run.  The title "Commander In Chief" carries the order of police chief; in fact ot carries authority equal to a General  and the power to initiate investigations on any citizen. Bidden is a citizen first and foremost. His political aspirations or his rivalries as a mere Democratic party member and potential candidate do not amount to immunity from investigation or prosecution. Where is there an abuse of power if anyone with due authority asks questions of a national ally to confirm what unusual,  suspicious activity may have taken place with the Bidden's giving the Ukrainian's unusual large cash payments?   There is also a rumor that they were trying buy asylum after a planned assassination of the VP and the President to make Pelozi President.  It's childish but so is this continued frenzy toward an impeachment with falsified allegations that have not been proven or substantiated by the FBI.           .   Before we worry about witnesses, you need to know the standard of proof in the forum you are entering.  It is proof beyond a reasonable doubt as you are dealing with allegations involving High Crimes. Courts involving allegations with respect to  Crimes operate on a standard of proof involving proof beyond a reasonable doubt.   Maybe Narnia Pelofi's teeth were falling out or maybe it did look like it.  You need evidence to pursue an impeachment.  Without evidence,  it is a fraud on the senate, a fraud on the Court.  The truth is that maybe his intention was national security to find out what any son of a Democrat was doing in the Ukraine since, after wikileaks, there is context and asking a foreign police service what they were doing in furtherance of the mandate of the national security services quite normal.  POTUS, as commander in chief, is at the head of all national security services and requesting your NATO colleagues for assistance to confirm what these Democrats  are doing is  quite normal when the Secretary of State in the previous administration is subject to indictment under the Espionage Act 1917.  Apparently, Bidden set the whole thing  in motion  and had his son's steal phones and left the phones in the open. The question is why Hunted Bidden gave the Ukrainian government   $300,000.00.   They may have also transmitted some of the wikileaks  information to ensure she could not be a viable candidate again, giving Bidden a chance to run.  The title "Commander In Chief" carries the order of police chief; in fact ot carries authority equal to a General  and the power to initiate investigations on any citizen. Bidden is a citizen first and foremost. His political aspirations or his rivalries as a mere Democratic party member and potential candidate do not amount to immunity from investigation or prosecution. Where is there an abuse of power if anyone with due authority asks questions of a national ally to confirm what unusual,  suspicious activity may have taken place with the Bidden's giving the Ukrainian's unusual large cash payments. There is also a rumor that they were trying buy asylum after a planned assassination of the VP and the President to make Pelozi President.  It's childish but so is this continued frenzy toward an impeachment with falsified allegations that have not been proven or substantiated by the FBI.