A recent discussion on theft of real property involves the way in which a purchaser for value without notice who intended to buy a certain property could actually buy the said property from a fraudster. This was once a popular cotillion conversation. But all fraudulent contracts are void in law and it certainly is a fraudulent contract to attempt to sell your brother's property or your grandfather's property when you are not the legal owner. It would be illegal to treat the property as your own without an accounting of the rents and a regular reporting to the beneficiaries if there was some estate involved. Even if you did account for the profits, who appointed you to do it presumptively? Granddad will be back tomorrow. He is not dead. A contract to sell property you do not actually own is an illegal contract and is void. The third party purchaser has no place in the discussion except but as a victim of crime or as an accomplice of the theft being perpetrated by the seller and his recourse is against the fraudster only if he complains since wilful blindness and a failure to search title in the usual course is not protection against the "buyer beware" principle. A third party buyer cannot defeat the equitable and legal rights of the actual owner whose rights are undefeatable. The notion of third party rights for value without notice is an unusual and evident lacuna as the law of theft and the fraudsters endeavour cannot be aided and abetted by the Court. What is going on in Englishdom? No property ownership in the alleged sale has transferred to any third party if you are not the legal registered owner and clearly you are just a f-cking thief if you are trying to sell the property even if it's Poo Power ™. It's a unique name; isn't it? It's owner is Warren A. Lyon who owns the fuel system concept behind it. The squatters rights also must fail as the issue is trespass to property by the squatters. The owners have a right to enjoy their unfettered ownership even if they are unaware of the trespass and the squatters if it is that they cannot be contacted or located. This lacuna should also be closed as the law should not encourage the disappearances of owners and their families. ARGF FIRM.

A recent discussion on theft of real property involves the way in which a purchaser for value without notice who intended to buy a certain property  could actually buy the said  property from a fraudster. This was once a popular cotillion conversation.  But all fraudulent contracts are void in law and it certainly is a fraudulent contract to attempt to sell your brother's property or your grandfather's property when you are not the legal owner. It would be illegal to treat the property as your own without an accounting of the rents and a regular reporting to the beneficiaries if there was some estate involved.   Even if you did account for the profits, who appointed you to do it presumptively? Granddad will be back tomorrow. He is not dead.      A contract to sell property you do not actually own is an illegal contract and is void.  The third party purchaser has no place in the discussion except but as a victim of crime or as an accomplice of the theft being perpetrated by the seller and his recourse is against the fraudster only if he complains since wilful blindness and a failure to search title in the usual course is not protection against the  "buyer beware" principle.    A third party buyer cannot defeat the equitable and legal rights of the actual owner whose rights are undefeatable.   The notion of third party rights for value without notice is an unusual and evident lacuna as the law of theft and the fraudsters endeavour cannot be aided and abetted by the Court.    What is going on in Englishdom?   No property ownership in the alleged sale has transferred to any third party  if you are not the legal registered owner and clearly you are just a f-cking thief if you are trying to sell the property even if it's Poo Power ™. It's a unique name;  isn't it? It's owner is Warren A. Lyon who owns the fuel system concept behind it.      The squatters rights also must fail as the issue is trespass to property by the squatters.  The owners have a right to enjoy their unfettered ownership even if they are unaware of the trespass and the squatters if it is that they cannot be contacted or located. This lacuna should also be closed as the law should not encourage  the disappearances of owners and their families.    

ARGF FIRM.