The CBCA has been updated and is still the subject of business law exams.. If there is any offence under this act, it would have to be legislated and appear within the act. If there is anything required of anyone engaged in work as prescribed by the act, the act is the final authority on any issue. This is important when unfortunately, there are people who have had some exposure to forms and information requested in such activities while working in one jurisdiction or the other. Warren knows. He has worked in England, Canada, the US, Europe and the West Indies. Much of what is required in these arenas is very similar and maintains a functional and also legal balance between privacy rights and also the function of identifying individuals as and when necessary. The forms used for these purposes must comply with the balance in privacy as struck by the act. If the form does not comply with the act and asks for more information that what is legally prescribed then the form is illegal or we may say inconsistent or unclear. The ACT on the issue of identifying persons considered having significant control or control as control persons is clear as to what it requires. It does not ask for Social Insurance Numbers. The legislation seeks relevant information as related to the corporation in the said jurisdiction. It asks for citizenship of the individuals as related to the corporation and it also asks for the relevant address of the individuals in the jurisdiction for tax purposes. The residential address is clear. It does not ask for the mailing address. It does not ask for all potential addresses in the entire world. It does not ask for all the Social Insurance numbers in the entire world as belonging to the individual and if you see something that the individual has designed that has been offered for sale and you received your income support from 14 years old and you are now 35, then buy the idea offered at only $9000.00. You have the money. Asking for additional prescribed information in the act and know one knows what that is says the law is unknowable and this update to the CBCA has not passed through Hansard. WHAT DO YOU MEAN? WHAT ARE THE PARAMATERS OF "PRESCRIBED INFORMATON? " You know this is illegal when there is nothing prescribed although other unusual things contrary to the legislation is asked for on the form. If the information requested is not delineated in the Act or related statutory instruments or regulations, it does not appear on any form legally and then the form itself is prepared contrary to statute, contrary to law over and above what is requested by the law. So, YOU have committed a criminal offence in the preparation of the form. You have committed a criminal offence in uttering a false statement when you suggest a committee has decided to update the act to request this information. There was no committee; just him in Richmond Hill so he could kill all the people who have significant control over a youtube channel. Would you kill someone for $9000.00? It's kind of an act of terrorism also to have usurped the Monarch's authority and alter legislation contrary to the will of the Monarch. You did not say Royal Assent as required by all Acts duly passed by Parliament. You said "committee" and the "committee" cannot pass laws. This would usually be a very serious problem and you would probably be running for your life if you could see beyond the frequency generated by your telephone what is usually called "the consequences" and you did this all in some covid hype. You received what you were asking for in the form. All information was provided accurately. See the response here attached. The form now complies with the legislation. The simple point is that we could design any form but does the information requested on the form or web page comply with the law as clearly stated?
The CBCA has been updated and is still the subject of business law exams.. If there is any offence under this act, it would have to be legislated and appear within the act. If there is anything required of anyone engaged in work as prescribed by the act, the act is the final authority on any issue. This is important when unfortunately, there are people who have had some exposure to forms and information requested in such activities while working in one jurisdiction or the other. Warren knows. He has worked in England, Canada, the US, Europe and the West Indies. Much of what is required in these arenas is very similar and maintains a functional and also legal balance between privacy rights and also the function of identifying individuals as and when necessary. The forms used for these purposes must comply with the balance in privacy as struck by the act. If the form does not comply with the act and asks for more information that what is legally prescribed then the form is illegal or we may say inconsistent or unclear. The ACT on the issue of identifying persons considered having significant control or control as control persons is clear as to what it requires. It does not ask for Social Insurance Numbers. The legislation seeks relevant information as related to the corporation in the said jurisdiction. It asks for citizenship of the individuals as related to the corporation and it also asks for the relevant address of the individuals in the jurisdiction for tax purposes. The residential address is clear. It does not ask for the mailing address. It does not ask for all potential addresses in the entire world. It does not ask for all the Social Insurance numbers in the entire world as belonging to the individual and if you see something that the individual has designed that has been offered for sale and you received your income support from 14 years old and you are now 35, then buy the idea offered at only $9000.00. You have the money. Asking for additional prescribed information in the act and know one knows what that is says the law is unknowable and this update to the CBCA has not passed through Hansard. WHAT DO YOU MEAN? WHAT ARE THE PARAMATERS OF "PRESCRIBED INFORMATON? " You know this is illegal when there is nothing prescribed although other unusual things contrary to the legislation is asked for on the form. If the information requested is not delineated in the Act or related statutory instruments or regulations, it does not appear on any form legally and then the form itself is prepared contrary to statute, contrary to law over and above what is requested by the law. So, YOU have committed a criminal offence in the preparation of the form. You have committed a criminal offence in uttering a false statement when you suggest a committee has decided to update the act to request this information. There was no committee; just him in Richmond Hill so he could kill all the people who have significant control over a youtube channel. Would you kill someone for $9000.00? It's kind of an act of terrorism also to have usurped the Monarch's authority and alter legislation contrary to the will of the Monarch. You did not say Royal Assent as required by all Acts duly passed by Parliament. You said "committee" and the "committee" cannot pass laws. This would usually be a very serious problem and you would probably be running for your life if you could see beyond the frequency generated by your telephone what is usually called "the consequences" and you did this all in some covid hype. You received what you were asking for in the form. All information was provided accurately. See the response here attached. The form now complies with the legislation.
The simple point is that we could design any form but does the information requested on the form or web page comply with the law as clearly stated?
This was not passed by any committee in the parliament and to say so is a criminal offence when we know it was the Education Director for York Region who is about 29 years old. You have been provided the information requested and more.
THE LEGISLATION IS THE LAW. HAVE YOU COMPLIED? SEE THE RELEVANT SECTIONS BELOW. THIS IS INFORMATION NEVER REALLY REQUESTED BEFORE AND IT MAY HAVE APPEARED IN AN ARTICLE TO HELP SOMEONE UNDERSTAND THE RIGHTS RELATED TO CONTRACTS INVOLVING OPTIONS TO OWN SHARES. BY VIRTUE OF A CONTRACT ALONE, THOSE INDIVIDUALS HAVE CONTROL OVER THE CORPORATION LIMITED TO ASKING QUESTIONS AND PROVIDING SUGGESTIONS WITH THE RIGHT TO BE INVITED TO ANY MEETINGS INVOLVING THE CORPORATION. BUT IT IS NOT SIGNIFICANT CONTROL. YET, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT, A MAN REGISTERS A CORPORATION CALLED "GARDENS R' US INC" AND NOW HE IS A PERSON IN SIGNIFICANT CONTROL SINCE HE WOULD ALSO HAVE TO BE A DIRECTOR.
COUNTRIES WHERE THE INDIVIDUAL IS CONSIDERED A RESIDENT FOR TAX PURPOSES AS RELATED TO THE RELEVANT CORPORATION IN THE SAID JURISDICTION.
21.1 (1) The corporation shall prepare and maintain, at its registered office or at any other place in Canada designated by the directors, a register of individuals with significant control over the corporation that contains
(a) for each individual with significant control,
(i) their name and date of birth,
(ii) their residential address, and
(iii) their address for service, if it has been provided to the corporation;
(a.1) the citizenship of each individual with significant control;
(b) the jurisdiction of residence for tax purposes of each individual with significant control;
(c) the day on which each individual became or ceased to be an individual with significant control, as the case may be;
(d) a description of how each individual is an individual with significant control over the corporation, including, as applicable, a description of their interests and rights in respect of shares of the corporation;
(e) any other prescribed information; and
(f) a description of each step taken in accordance with subsection (2).
Updating of information
(2) The corporation shall, at the following times, take reasonable steps to ensure that it has identified all individuals with significant control over the corporation and that the information in the register is accurate, complete and up-to-date:
(a) at least once during each financial year of the corporation;
(b) on the request of the Director; and
(c) at the times provided for in the regulations.
Comments
Post a Comment