A daughter complained about her mothers national geographic photo of two young women bathing on a beach. They are about 20 years old and in the West Indies, at 20 years old you might still look kind of too young to be working at the hotel with all the fish and shellfish or shrimp they eat all day. The daughter thought the photo was inappropriate. She made one more call. Then all of a sudden, the wall where the photo was placed fell down when police came dressed as work men and complained that there was damp rot in the wall. They broke the dry wall, They stole the builder's insulation q and sprayed dog saliva on the wall. Then they covered it with new dry wall but did not The moisture took the dry wall and the concrete and took over the whole building just because they demanded that there would be no wall again for the photo to rest on since it seems to be a photo people don't like but it's not illegal if they are both over age in fact under US and Canadian Law but look youngish in the West Indies...from how they appear. They were charged for criminal damage and theft of insulation. The son said the photo was just kind of awkward in the laundry room if you are not African etc but it's "National Geographic." The police wanted to know how a Terrorist convict is walking around, making complaints on her mother? Her brother did not give her permission to say or do anything with that barn she is using to grow things since she never asked. She was in terrorist trespass and was convicted. The police lost their jobs. They asked later why only the brother took the photo off the wall? That led to an argument. So why didn't the daughter just steal the photo and , throw it out and then replace it with something else? She took a phot of the art and was charged for having suspicious, lude imagery on her phone when she showed the police. If you allege it's wrong then it's wrong to you and being in possession of inappropriate material is the appropriate charge.

 A daughter complained about her mothers national geographic photo of two young women bathing on a beach. They are about 20 years old and in the West Indies, at 20 years old you might still look kind of too young to be working at the hotel with all the fish and shellfish or shrimp they eat all day.  The daughter thought the photo was inappropriate.

 She made one more call. Then all of a sudden, the wall where the photo was placed fell down when police came dressed as work men and complained that there was damp rot in the wall. They broke  the dry wall, They stole the builder's insulation q and sprayed dog saliva on the wall. Then they covered  it with new dry wall but did not The moisture took the dry wall and the concrete and took over the whole building just because they demanded that there would be no wall again for the photo to rest on since it seems to be a photo people don't like but it's not illegal if they are both over age in fact under US and Canadian Law but look  youngish in the West Indies...from how they appear. They were charged for criminal damage and theft of insulation. The son said the photo was just kind of awkward in the laundry room if you are not African etc but it's "National Geographic." 

The police wanted to know how a Terrorist convict is walking around, making complaints on her mother? Her brother did not give her permission to say or do anything with that barn she is using to grow things since she never asked.   She was in terrorist trespass and was convicted.  

 The police lost their jobs. They asked later why only the brother took the photo off the wall? That led to an argument. So why didn't the daughter just steal the photo and , throw it out and then replace it with something else?  She took a phot of the art and was charged for having suspicious, lude imagery on her phone when she showed the police. If you allege it's wrong then it's wrong to you and being in possession of inappropriate material is the appropriate charge.