VAT rates for goods and services % of VAT What the rate applies to Standard rate 20% Most goods and services Reduced rate 5% Some goods and services, for example, children’s car seats and home energy Zero rate 0% Zero-rated goods and services, for example, most food and children’s clothes We seek co-fulfillment in our co-habit of good expectation. The economy must honor thee Greatness. Thee Greatness must be honoured. Thee Greatness has worked to ensure beautiful landscapes. The people must enough money to match this beauty. What if you went to a Nova Scotia Supermarket today and saw that the sales tax rate is 0.0%? That is not a value added tax. The sales tax rate is 0. Is this the law in Canada now? If my pockets are empty because the bank has not released the benefit payment advice, how does this help? How does a 0 rate stimulate the economy? There is still a price to pay? All it really means is that the government did not earn any money. It needs some to fuel the economy. If you took .5% of every supermarket food or fast food transaction, you as the King or Queen or government etc earn billions a year in a very well populated economy like the UK and you still express your emotions about the government that you want it, somehow, to feel down and under you....! This is very kind of you if it's .5%. .5% is a goal like a football goal. 0% is nothing. It's the economic "no goal." But if it's 0%(zero), the consumer still needs to find the £1.39. 0.5 % of a £1.00 is half of one pence. If we are to make the government feel small and down under us then we prop up ourselves with a financial jet pack that works out to 6 pence per second. So, we suggest 6 pence a second; 365 days per year as the benefit paid to every citizen. We still need the money in an increasingly jobless world beset by automation so that we can buy food and all other necessities. This is not such a time consuming discussion any where else in the world except but in Canada. In England they are beset by fraudsters in the bank. The London Transit bus driver's benefit has been going to the sundry account since 1992. It was an inside job bank fraud. The money is still in the bank but not credited to their account. Many of these people were London graduates. The UK Dorchester transit bus driver still got his benefits without interruptions. We thank his or her Greatness for this little help. There are crimes and criminals in every country. However the pattern in the UK (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Canada) is to pay the benefit to every citizen and also to pay in equal amounts. Paying your people insufficient income support is the economic "no goal." This 6 pence is collected every minute from the dales tax collected across the economy and then paid out monthly to the citizens at about £2628.00 per month. We thank thee. We only need to stimulate the economy with a few pennies per minute paid into the life of every consumer. This is the King principle, the Queen concept. We pay this money in to their lives at rates that are comparable to the populations that surround us, occupy us and that will outnumber us in the world if we do not defend and protect our own population with this money. We are engaged in economic warfare; an economic war. Our people need to be equipped with just as much money as the other people who surround and occupy us and it should arrive in the recipient accounts with 100% certainty after the government sent it. The bank employees were not held by a Dame or Duchess that they might have a politician's authority to evade the full burn of consequences for their terrorist mischief. They are regular people. This is better than losing .5% or more on each food transaction. 20% is ideal on everything once we ensure every Canadian and UK citizen receives their income support and that income support is not diverted, stolen or held in some processing limbo by fraudsters in the banks. Also, if you know an account is open but not available for the beneficiary to receive the funds since 1984 and a memo was issued by the government in 1988 on this issue, why keep sending the benefit money to that inaccessible account? But if the citizen is not getting his benefit or insufficient benefits, then it's a criminal offence under UK law. It's a crime against the state. All crimes are. The Charge of Life Endangerment is one charge to satisfy this scenario. Under the Terrorism Act 2000, endangering a person’s life (other than that of the person committing the action) is a crime. This is in accordance with and in addition to; Creating a serious risk to the health or safety of the public; and All action designed to seriously interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system[1] such as the benefits payment process system. The money is not in the intended account of the recipient. Is it that the benefits are stolen by bankers or left in a technical limbo almost forever by bankers? What is a Sundry account? What is the incoming payment cue? Why does it not just end up in your account directly from the government after being sent by the government? This is how it works in.... Grenada or the Caymans or the Bahamas. Did you see this 0% sales tax? This is not a value added tax. In England, however, the price you see on the website or on the shelf is the final price with tax added in or there is no tax if it's food. The receipt will show you the tax rate that is usually 20%; 0% if it's food. For the bread on the Tesco site that you see below, the price is as advertised at £1.39. That includes the 20% VAT. The Supermarket adds 20% to the picket on the store shelves and on the website. When I was a kid in the UK, the VAT was not exempt on food and it was 17.5%.

VAT rates for goods and services

	% of VAT	What the rate applies to
Standard rate	20%	Most goods and services
Reduced rate	5%	Some goods and services, for example, children’s car seats and home energy
Zero rate	0%	Zero-rated goods and services, for example, most food and children’s clothes

We seek co-fulfillment in our co-habit of good expectation.

The economy must honor thee Greatness.  Thee Greatness must be honoured.   Thee Greatness has worked to ensure beautiful landscapes. The people must enough money to match this beauty.  

What if you went to a Nova Scotia Supermarket today and saw that the sales tax rate is 0.0%?  That is not a value added tax. The sales tax rate is 0. Is this the law in Canada  now? If my pockets  are empty because the bank has not released the benefit payment advice, how does this help? How does a 0 rate stimulate the economy?  There is still a price to pay?  All it really means is that the government did not earn any money.  It needs some to fuel the economy. If you took .5% of every supermarket food or fast food transaction, you as the King or Queen or government etc earn billions a year in a very well populated economy like the UK and you still express your emotions about the government that you want it,

somehow, to feel down and under you....!  

This is very kind of you if it's .5%.  .5% is a goal like a football goal. 0% is nothing.  It's the economic "no goal."  But if it's 0%(zero),  the consumer still needs to find the £1.39.   0.5 % of a £1.00 is half of one pence.   If we are to make the government feel small and down under us then we prop up ourselves with a financial jet pack that works out to 6 pence per second.   So, we suggest 6 pence a second; 365 days per year as the benefit paid to every citizen.  We still need the money in an increasingly jobless world beset by automation so that we can buy food and all other necessities.  This is not such a time consuming discussion any where else in the world except but in Canada.  In England they are beset by fraudsters in the bank. The London Transit bus driver's  benefit has been going to the sundry account since 1992.  It was an inside job bank  fraud. The money  is still in the bank but not credited to their account.  Many of these people were London graduates.  The UK Dorchester transit bus driver still got his benefits without interruptions.  We thank his or her Greatness for this little help.

There are crimes and criminals in every country. However the pattern in the UK 

 (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland,  Canada) is to pay the benefit to every citizen and also to pay in equal amounts.  

Paying your people insufficient income support is the economic "no goal."  This 6 pence is collected every minute from the dales tax collected across the economy and then paid out monthly to the citizens at about £2628.00 per month. We thank thee. We only need to stimulate the economy with a few pennies  per minute paid into the life of every consumer. This is the King principle, the Queen concept. 

 We pay this money in to their lives at rates that are comparable to the populations that surround us, occupy  us and that will  outnumber us in the world if we do not defend and protect our own population with this money. 

We are engaged  in economic warfare; an economic war.  

Our people need to be equipped with just as much money as the other people who surround and occupy us and it should arrive in the recipient accounts with 100% certainty after the government sent it. The bank employees were not held by a Dame or Duchess that they might have a politician's authority to evade the full burn of consequences for their terrorist mischief. They are regular people. 

This is better than losing .5% or more on each food transaction. 20% is ideal on everything once we ensure every Canadian and UK citizen receives their income support and that income support is not diverted, stolen or held in some processing limbo by fraudsters in the banks.  Also, if you know an account is open but not available for the beneficiary to receive the funds since 1984 and a memo was issued by the government in 1988 on this issue, why keep sending the benefit money to that

 inaccessible account?  

But if the citizen is not getting his benefit or insufficient benefits, then it's a criminal offence under UK law.   It's a crime against the state. All crimes are. 

The Charge of Life Endangerment is one charge to satisfy this scenario.

• Under the Terrorism Act 2000, endangering a person’s life (other than that of the person committing the action) is a crime. This is in accordance with and in addition to;
• Creating a serious risk to the health or safety of the public; and
• All action designed to seriously interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system[1] such as the benefits payment process system. The money is not in the intended account of the recipient. 

  Is it that the benefits are stolen by bankers or left in a technical limbo almost  forever by bankers?  What is a Sundry account? What is the incoming payment  cue?  Why does it not just end up 

in your account directly from the government after being sent by the government?  This is how it works in.... Grenada or the Caymans or the Bahamas.

Did you see this 0% sales tax?  

This is not a value added tax. In England, however, the price you see on the website or on the shelf is the final price with tax added in or there is no tax if it's food.  The receipt will show you the tax rate that is usually 20%; 0% if it's food.   For the bread on the Tesco site that you see below, the price  is as advertised at £1.39.  That includes the 20% VAT.  The Supermarket adds 20% to the picket on the store shelves and on the website.  When I was a kid in the UK, the VAT was not exempt on food and it was 17.5%.