A woman sees a house on #25 Green Acre. She knows that the owner intends to put it up for rent. She is getting everything in order for the tenants. He is not there every day. Certainly, it's not abandoned. Some individual approaches the house and decided to enter and sleep there. She finds a stolen vehicle and drives it. It is not registered to her. What gives her the presumptuous idea to access the property, remove a door bell and remove the dog? She has no legal bases for her actions. She also tries to put in a white man as a squatter and hopes to see a fight. She is Chinese. The owner is also Chinese or he is a Mulatto Black Chinese. She is already convicted but she does it again. The owner is trying to rent it. The police arrest the occupant she has placed illegally at the property. How do explain her behaviour? A: She is evil and stupid. B: She is stupid. C: She is evil. D: She has a criminal predilection. Part B. You get a warning on your phone that this is an occupied property and you must leave or else you must pay a per diem rate or else you face imminent conviction. You do not leave after the warning. You do not make payment. In 3 months, your social insurance number is cancelled. You are not a citizen, so can you....xyz.... now? You also, in your habits, steal and shoplift food items in the supermarket. You do not make payment. But, you could and then you get your social insurance number back. What did your grandparents spend in airline tickets to get you to.....? It was about $5000.00. You asked to know their ancestry, their beliefs and decisiveness that got you here. What would you say explained this choice in direction or behaviour? Answer the question in 300 words.

 A woman sees a house on #25 Green Acre.  She knows that the owner intends to put it up for rent. She is getting  everything in order for the tenants. He is not there every day. Certainly, it's not abandoned. Some individual approaches the house and decided to enter and sleep there. She finds a stolen vehicle and drives it.  It is not registered to her.  What gives her the presumptuous idea  to access the property, remove a door bell and remove the dog? She has no legal bases for her actions.  She also tries to put in a white man  as a squatter and hopes to see a fight.  She is Chinese. The owner is also Chinese or he is a Mulatto Black Chinese. She is already convicted but she does it again. The owner is trying to rent it. The police arrest the occupant she has placed illegally at the property. How do explain  her behaviour?

A: She is evil and stupid. 

B: She is stupid. 

C: She is evil.

D: She has a criminal predilection.

Part B.

You get a warning on your phone that this is an occupied property and you must leave or else you must pay a per diem rate or else you face imminent conviction. You do not leave after the warning.    You do not make payment.   In 3 months, your social insurance number is cancelled. You are not a citizen, so can you....xyz.... now?  You also, in your habits, steal and shoplift food items in the supermarket. You do not make payment. But, you could and then you get your social insurance number back. What did your  grandparents  spend in airline  tickets to get you to.....? It was about $5000.00.  You asked to know their ancestry, their beliefs and decisiveness that got you here. What would you say explained this choice in direction or behaviour? Answer the question in 300 words. 



Comments