I think the CEO for Untied Health is actually not dead and had Christmas dinner in Texas as the driver for the governor. There is no murder, no dead body and no autopsy of the dead. But we have a fraud on the Court and the People of the United States for which the accused requires compensation. It's Steven Murmeror Lawrence. He has criminal antecedents. He is trying to kill. There is a description of a shooter in New York and it looks like Aunt Jemima with a loose hat on but her perm shows and her necklace but with a mask. The police are looking for a suspect that fits the description but fitting the description is not actual commission of the offence. A hat and mask cannot in themselves stand trial and any one could have worn that hat and mask. We need to know if this is the actual puller of the trigger at that moment in time. They see the photos of aunt Jemima on the pan cake box with the hat and mask. So they go to speak with her. Can she be convicted for the crime in New York and what do they have to prove for conviction in New York? In New York, the legal system has high standards for proving a person committed a crime. Simply "fitting a description" or owning similar clothing is not enough for a conviction. For the person you described to be convicted in a New York court, the prosecution must meet several strict requirements. 1. The Burden of Proof: Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Under New York Criminal Procedure Law § 70.20, no person can be convicted unless the evidence establishes their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. * Not Just "Probable": It is not enough to show that she "probably" did it or that she is the most likely suspect because of her appearance. * Moral Certainty: The jury or judge must be "firmly convinced" of her guilt. If there is a "real possibility" that she is not the person who pulled the trigger, the law requires an acquittal. 2. Proof of Identity The prosecution must prove two distinct things beyond a reasonable doubt: * The Offense: That the crime (the shooting) actually happened. * The Commission: That this specific individual was the person who committed it. As you noted, a hat and a mask cannot stand trial. In cases where a suspect's face was covered, the prosecution must find "corroborating" evidence to link the individual to the act. This might include: * Distinctive Characteristics: While a common hat or mask might not be enough, specific "internal patterns" or unique wear and tear on clothing (like the necklace or specific details of the perm mentioned) can sometimes be used as circumstantial evidence. * Physical Evidence: DNA on the mask, fingerprints on the weapon, or gunpowder residue on her hands. * Other Evidence: GPS data from a phone, video showing her entering or leaving the scene, or witness testimony from someone who saw her put on or take off the mask. 3. Elements of the Crime Beyond just identity, the state must prove every "element" of the specific charge. For a shooting, this typically includes: * Intent: That she intended to cause the result (e.g., intended to kill or cause serious physical injury). * The Act: That she was the "actual puller of the trigger" at that exact moment. Entering 306 Manhattan Drive and 24 Arlene Crescent would not be a crime for Warren A. Lyon. He can wear a hat to his front door.

 

I think the CEO for Untied Health is actually not dead and had Christmas dinner in Texas as the driver for the governor. There is no murder, no dead body and no autopsy of the dead. But we have a fraud on the Court and the People of the United States for which the accused requires compensation. It's Steven Murmeror  Lawrence. He has criminal antecedents. He is trying to kill.   

There is a description of a shooter in New York and it  looks like Aunt Jemima with a loose hat on but her perm shows and her necklace but with a mask.  The police are looking for a suspect that fits the description but fitting the description is not actual commission of the offence. A hat and mask cannot in themselves stand trial and any one could have worn that hat and mask. We need to know if this is the actual puller of the trigger at that moment in time.  They see the photos of aunt Jemima on the pan cake box with the hat and mask. So they go to speak with her. Can she be convicted for the crime in New York and what do they have to prove for conviction in New York?       In New York, the legal system has high standards for proving a person committed a crime. Simply "fitting a description" or owning similar clothing is not enough for a conviction.  For the person you described to be convicted in a New York court, the prosecution must meet several strict requirements.  1. The Burden of Proof: Beyond a Reasonable Doubt  Under New York Criminal Procedure Law § 70.20, no person can be convicted unless the evidence establishes their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.   * Not Just "Probable": It is not enough to show that she "probably" did it or that she is the most likely suspect because of her appearance.   * Moral Certainty: The jury or judge must be "firmly convinced" of her guilt. If there is a "real possibility" that she is not the person who pulled the trigger, the law requires an acquittal.  2. Proof of Identity  The prosecution must prove two distinct things beyond a reasonable doubt:   * The Offense: That the crime (the shooting) actually happened.   * The Commission: That this specific individual was the person who committed it.  As you noted, a hat and a mask cannot stand trial. In cases where a suspect's face was covered, the prosecution must find "corroborating" evidence to link the individual to the act. This might include:   * Distinctive Characteristics: While a common hat or mask might not be enough, specific "internal patterns" or unique wear and tear on clothing (like the necklace or specific details of the perm mentioned) can sometimes be used as circumstantial evidence.   * Physical Evidence: DNA on the mask, fingerprints on the weapon, or gunpowder residue on her hands.   * Other Evidence: GPS data from a phone, video showing her entering or leaving the scene, or witness testimony from someone who saw her put on or take off the mask.  3. Elements of the Crime  Beyond just identity, the state must prove every "element" of the specific charge. For a shooting, this typically includes:   * Intent: That she intended to cause the result (e.g., intended to kill or cause serious physical injury).   * The Act: That she was the "actual puller of the trigger" at that exact moment.  Entering 306 Manhattan Drive and 24 Arlene Crescent would not be a crime for Warren A. Lyon.  He can wear a hat to his front door.