Click here. The Walgreen squatter. This scenario highlights a profound disconnect between the individual's actions and the reality of the legal system. Even if the store manager were to pass away while traveling, it would not serve as a "get out of jail free" card. In fact, it might exacerbate the individual's legal predicament. . The "Wait and See" Strategy The individual’s hope that the store manager will pass away to make the charges "go away" is legally flawed for two reasons: * The State vs. The Defendant: Once a person is convicted or charged with "Terrorist Trespass" and product tampering, the case is typically prosecuted by the State/Government, not the individual manager. The manager’s presence is not required for the conviction to stand or for the police to execute an arrest warrant. This is a highly complex scenario involving a significant breakdown of both legal compliance and corporate ethics. Based on the details provided, the individual is operating in a state of "legal limbo"—having already been convicted of serious charges but not yet apprehended—while simultaneously committing a series of new, distinct crimes.

Click here.  The Walgreen squatter.

 This scenario highlights a profound disconnect between the individual's actions and the reality of the legal system. Even if the store manager were to pass away while traveling, it would not serve as a "get out of jail free" card. In fact, it might exacerbate the individual's legal predicament. 

. The "Wait and See" Strategy

The individual’s hope that the store manager will pass away to make the charges "go away" is legally flawed for two reasons:

 * The State vs. The Defendant: Once a person is convicted or charged with "Terrorist Trespass" and product tampering, the case is typically prosecuted by the State/Government, not the individual manager. The manager’s presence is not required for the conviction to stand or for the police to execute an arrest warrant.

This is a highly complex scenario involving a significant breakdown of both legal compliance and corporate ethics. Based on the details provided, the individual is operating in a state of "legal limbo"—having already been convicted of serious charges but not yet apprehended—while simultaneously committing a series of new, distinct crimes.

Here is a breakdown of the legal and professional implications of his actions.

1. Product Tampering and Public Health

The behavior described (sampling, licking, and diluting products) moves beyond simple theft into the realm of product tampering and criminal mischief.

 * Noxious Substances: Adding saliva or tap water to consumer goods can be legally classified as the administration of a noxious substance, especially if it poses a biohazard or health risk to the public.

 * Terrorist Trespass: You mentioned a conviction for "terrorist trespass." In many jurisdictions, targeting the food or medicine supply (even at a retail level) elevates standard tampering to a high-level felony or domestic terrorism charge because it creates widespread public fear and endangers the community.

2. Employment Law and Fiduciary Duty

As a District Manager, this individual has a fiduciary duty to the company. His refusal to perform his duties (payroll and ordering) constitutes a massive breach of contract and criminal activity:

 * Wage Theft/Mischief: Intentionally withholding a manager's salary is a violation of labor laws. When he attempts to redirect those funds to himself, he enters the territory of Embezzlement and Wire Fraud.

 * Obstruction of Operations: By refusing to order food/supplies because it doesn't serve his "personal goals," he is committing Sabotage. In a corporate context, this is often handled as "criminal breach of trust."

3. The "Wait and See" Strategy

The individual’s hope that the store manager will pass away to make the charges "go away" is legally flawed for two reasons:

 * The State vs. The Defendant: Once a person is convicted or charged with "Terrorist Trespass" and product tampering, the case is typically prosecuted by the State/Government, not the individual manager. The manager’s presence is not required for the conviction to stand or for the police to execute an arrest warrant.

 * Liens and Government Interest: Since you mentioned the property carries government liens, the state has a direct vested interest in the integrity of the building. This makes the crimes "crimes against the state," which are pursued regardless of the status of store employees.

4. Criminal Charges Overview

| Action | Potential Legal Classification |

|---|---|

| Living in the store | Aggravated Trespass / Burglary |

| Licking/Diluting products | Product Tampering / Consumer Product Tampering |

| Withholding Manager's Pay | Wage Theft / Labor Law Violations |

| Redirecting funds to self | Attempted Fraud / Embezzlement |

| Refusing to leave after 30 days | Defiant Trespass |

Summary of the Situation

The individual appears to be operating under a delusion that he still holds authority within a system he has already been convicted of violating. His actions since the conviction—specifically the fraud and the tampering—likely constitute new, separate criminal counts that will be added to his existing record once he is apprehended.

Because he is "awaiting apprehension," every moment he stays in the building and interferes with the business adds to the eventual sentencing guidelines, likely removing any possibility of leniency or "time served."

We could explain the specific differences between "Criminal Mischief" and "Embezzlement" in a corporate setting?

This scenario highlights a profound disconnect between the individual's actions and the reality of the legal system. Even if the store manager were to pass away while traveling, it would not serve as a "get out of jail free" card. In fact, it might exacerbate the individual's legal predicament.

Here is a discussion on why the manager’s status is irrelevant to the conviction and how the individual's current actions are creating a "compounding criminal liability."

1. The Persistence of the Conviction

The hope that the manager passing away would end the legal trouble is a significant misunderstanding of criminal law.

 * The State as Prosecutor: In cases of "Terrorist Trespass" and "Product Tampering," the legal case is titled The People vs. [The Individual] or The State vs. [The Individual]. The store manager is merely a witness or a representative of the victimized entity (Walgreens). If a witness passes away after a conviction has already been secured, the conviction remains valid.

 * Government Liens: Because you noted the property has government liens for infrastructure (pipes, sewage, electricity), the crime is viewed as an offense against public infrastructure. The government’s interest in protecting that property does not die with the store manager.

2. New Crimes: The "Second Wave" of Charges

The individual is currently committing a series of "post-conviction" crimes. Even if he were somehow cleared of the first charge, these new actions would lead to immediate new warrants:

 * Financial Fraud and Embezzlement: Attempting to redirect payroll to himself is a separate felony. Since he is using corporate systems to do this, it likely constitutes Wire Fraud, which is a federal offense in many jurisdictions.

 * Deprivation of Rights: Intentionally withholding pay and food orders (essential supplies) to see if it helps his "personal goals" demonstrates malice aforethought. If his withholding of supplies were to contribute to the manager’s ill health or death, he could be charged with Manslaughter or Depraved Indifference Murder.

3. The Failure of the "Seniority" Defense

The individual seems to be relying on his status as a "District Manager with seniority" to justify his presence. However:

 * Termination by Law: In most corporate structures, a conviction for "Terrorist Trespass" against company property triggers an automatic "for cause" termination, regardless of seniority.

 * Ultra Vires Acts: His actions (sleeping in the store, tampering with products) are ultra vires—meaning "beyond his power." Seniority does not grant legal permission to commit product tampering or live in a commercial space under government lien.

4. Impact of the Manager’s Death While Traveling

If the manager were to pass away while traveling, the following would occur:

 * Corporate Succession: Walgreens would simply appoint an interim manager or a corporate investigator to take over the site.

 * Estate Restitution: The requirement to pay restitution does not disappear. The money would simply be owed to the manager’s estate or to the corporation.

 * Increased Scrutiny: A death often brings more law enforcement attention to a workplace, not less. The individual's presence would be discovered almost immediately by the replacement management.

Summary of Legal Standing

The individual is currently in a state of active criminal escalation. By staying in the building, tampering with goods, and attempting to intercept payroll, he is converting a single conviction into a lifetime of cumulative sentences. Law enforcement "awaiting apprehension" usually means they are building a comprehensive file to ensure that when they do enter the building, the charges are so numerous that bail will be denied.