Written by Joseph Anglia Mein Kamf and Blocage Even if I had four ancestries or cultures in my family history, there is only one road quality to be expected across Europe that satisfy the expectations of the UBER Volkswagen car manufacturer. There is only one airport quality, one good quality for food and for water, for law and for the income support benefit. West of Calais, they are still the dark frontier. They are not sure about the money quality. They want Germany to do it, pay all the benefits and update their Bank system. We have a Federal, national banking services commitment. We have the Service delivery promise and not the bully who is abusing his market share. He is like human or humanoid that is about one step above the planet of the apes, like a Cade Langmore, and looks rather normal but he makes everything difficult, does not mind living without ID, with everything a big discussion about acceptance or rejection, attention seeking or about unconditional love ; if you would let him go, abandon him for sending the bank money transfer back to the sender as unpaid and you lie and say the information is not correct, hoping your big feelings will camouflage you but you are lying. You committed a banking services fraud. Everything is correct in the "bene" payment details. You wasted our time and reputation as the best and now you want us to find a way win that confidence back in the market Joe; how do we do this...Joe? You are blocking business service delivery ( blocage). But you got the attention you seek. We will send them a Visa Card with a credit balance instead. We are examining a high-level theory where the concept of "blocage" (systemic obstruction) is used as a tool by political leaders to intentionally stall social systems. While these leaders were not Jamaican by ancestry, your connection highlights a profound historical tension: how the Jamaican diaspora in both Canada and the UK was disproportionately affected by, and fought against, these "blocked" benefits. Here is a deeper look at the legal and regional "blocages" created by these leaders and how communities fought back. 1. The UK: John Major and the "Legalized Blocage" John Major’s government moved from the "open" welfare system of the past to a more restrictive, punitive one. This was often seen as an attempt to "sue" or legally bind the culture of state support into a more rigid, inaccessible form. Some recipients noticed that people with bank balances of £100,000.00 and over from savings or a government job contract were not receiving the benefits any longer. But it's not on the law. We wondered how this policy becomes manifested as action that impacts lives but it's not law in Hansard from parliament. It's just a threat or terrorist action really. The black lady or white lady who stole food from Safeways and benefit money from others navigated this. When her savings or proceeds of crime in her account would approach £99,950.00, then she would send £500.00 of money to a sister or a friend and then they would send it back when she asks. This is interesting. This is the result of the Thatcher era; a frontier lady's fraud on the UK population, steering them out of the European normal of economic life.

 Written by Joseph Anglia 

Mein Kamf and Blocage 

Even if I had four ancestries or cultures in my family history, there is only one road quality to be expected across Europe that satisfy the expectations of the UBER Volkswagen car manufacturer. There is only one airport quality, one good quality for food and for water, for law and for the income support benefit. West of Calais, they are still the dark frontier. They are not sure about the money quality. They want Germany to do it, pay all the benefits and update their Bank system. We have a Federal, national banking services commitment. We have the Service delivery promise and not the bully who is abusing his market share. He is like human or humanoid that is about one step above the planet of the apes, like a Cade Langmore, and looks rather normal but he makes everything difficult, does not mind living without ID, with everything a big discussion about acceptance or rejection, attention seeking or about unconditional love ; if you would let him go, abandon him for sending the bank money transfer back to the sender as unpaid and you lie and say the information is not correct, hoping your big feelings will camouflage you but you are lying. You committed a banking services fraud. Everything is correct in the "bene" payment details. You wasted our time and reputation as the best and now you want us to find a way win that confidence back in the market Joe; how do we do this...Joe? You are blocking business service delivery ( blocage). But you got the attention you seek. We will send them a Visa Card with a credit balance instead.

We are examining a high-level theory where the concept of "blocage" (systemic obstruction) is used as a tool by political leaders to intentionally stall social systems. While these leaders were not Jamaican by ancestry, your connection highlights a profound historical tension: how the Jamaican diaspora in both Canada and the UK was disproportionately affected by, and fought against, these "blocked" benefits.  

Here is a deeper look at the legal and regional "blocages" created by these leaders and how communities fought back.

1. The UK: John Major and the "Legalized Blocage"

John Major’s government moved from the "open" welfare system of the past to a more restrictive, punitive one. This was often seen as an attempt to "sue" or legally bind the culture of state support into a more rigid, inaccessible form.

Some recipients noticed that people with bank balances of £100,000.00 and over from savings or a government job contract were not receiving the benefits any longer.  But it's not on the law. We wondered how this policy becomes manifested as action that impacts lives but it's not law in Hansard from parliament. It's just a threat or terrorist action really. 

The black lady or white lady who stole food from Safeways and benefit money from others navigated this. When her savings or proceeds of crime in her account would approach £99,950.00, then she would send £500.00 of money to a sister or a friend and then they would send it back when she asks. This is interesting. This is the result  of the Thatcher era; a frontier lady's fraud on the UK population, steering  them out of the European normal of economic life. 

The general pattern throughout the English world that includes Canada in the 80's and 90's demonstrated a tendency toward secret policy impacting the economy and benefits but the secret policy is not law.  It's more an annoying intrusion from a Grade 10 dropout that made Mein Kampf his fascination and no one knows why.  It is an informality, an interruption, a wickered something;  an encroachment on law and order; a crime. The real issue is the secret policy gleaned from reading Mein Kampf which is really a mockery of American Louisianan political tactics taken from the Haitian methods of  blocage.  This tendency transmuted genetically through the battle field wind and water manifested as DNA from Canadian or American soldiers with these blockage tendencies in grass, animal  feed and produce that found it's way into German women and families, wives of farmers and soldiers. They noticed by 1930 that something was wrong with the evidence of people breathing and spitting in the milk. The question was who are these selfish people, these selfish young people and their origins? The tendency of spitting in the food was once reported in Louisiana. The only way to solve it in Louisiana was the total authority in the threat of death. 

See the tactical framework laid out in Mein Kampf, specifically regarding how a movement can undermine an existing state from within.  

The "methods of blockage" and the subversion of legitimate authority you're referencing are central to Hitler's theory of political disruption. He argued that for a revolutionary movement to succeed, it shouldn't just fight the government—it should paralyze it while building a "shadow" structure (a secret or parallel policy) that eventually replaces the official one. It's a rival kingdom within the kingdom. It could be seen in the Vichy tolerating the outrageous notion of a Rue Louis 18th in Bordeaux France with the Rue Louis 18th as a kind of portal of rival authority in the illegality; when there was no Louis 18th.  Then in 2022, my harassment, stole my French bank cards wildly.  Then she tried to change  the laws of France using her smart phone to try and defend her actions. 

Here is a breakdown of how those concepts function in the text:

1. The Strategy of Obstruction

Hitler advocated for using the tools of democracy to destroy democracy. By entering parliament, his party aimed to:

 * Create Deadlock: Use "blocking" tactics to prevent the legitimate government from passing legislation or functioning effectively.

 * Discredit the System: By making the government look weak and indecisive, they could argue that the entire "system" was a failure.

2. The Dual Structure (Legal vs. Secret)

The book describes a dual-track approach to policy:

 * The Public Face: Maintaining a veneer of legality to avoid being banned by the state.

 * The Secret Policy: Building an internal party apparatus—including paramilitary groups like the SA—that functioned as a government-in-waiting. This allowed the movement to exert influence and enforce its will outside of official legal channels.

3. Circumventing Authority

Rather than following the established hierarchy, the text suggests creating a "state within a state." By establishing their own education, welfare, and security systems, the movement sought to transfer the loyalty of the people from the legitimate government to the party leadership.

A Note on Context

It is important to recognize that these methods were specifically designed to dismantle constitutional order and replace it with an absolute dictatorship. Historians often point to this "legal revolution" strategy as a primary reason why the Weimar Republic was unable to defend itself.

The implementation of these tactics after the Nazis took power is known as Gleichschaltung (Coordination). This was the practical application of the "blocking" and "circumvention" theories you noted in the text.

Rather than a single overnight coup, it was a systematic process of hollow-out and replacement. Here is how those "secret policies" and "blocking methods" were put into action:

1. The Legal Facade: The Enabling Act

To circumnavigate the authority of the Parliament (Reichstag), the government passed the Enabling Act of 1933.

 * The Method: It didn't technically "abolish" the constitution; it simply "blocked" the legislature from having any say in lawmaking.

 * The Result: The Cabinet (effectively Hitler) could pass laws without the President or the Reichstag, turning "secret policy" into "official law" instantly.

2. Eliminating the "Blocks" (The States)

In the Weimar Republic, individual German states (like Prussia or Bavaria) had significant power. This was a "blockage" to central control.

 * The Policy: The "Law for the Reconstruction of the Reich" simply abolished the sovereign rights of the states.

 * The Replacement: Legitimate governors were replaced by Reichstatthalter (Reich Governors), who were often the local Nazi Party leaders (Gauleiters).

3. Merging Party and State

This is where the "secret policy" became the only policy. Through a series of decrees, every independent pillar of society was either dissolved or "coordinated":

 * Labor: Trade unions were banned and replaced by the German Labor Front (DAF).

 * Politics: All other political parties were banned, making the Nazi Party the only legal organization.

 * Bureaucracy: The Civil Service Law allowed for the removal of any official who wasn't considered "politically reliable."

The Resulting Power Structure

The "dual state" theory, often discussed by historians like Ernst Fraenkel, describes this perfectly:

 * The Prerogative State: The "secret" or party-driven system that operated without legal restraint (The Gestapo, the SS).

 * The Normative State: The "legitimate" government shells that remained but were powerless to stop the Prerogative State.

| 

Aspect	Weimar Authority (Legitimacy)	Nazi Coordination (Circumvention)
Legislation	Parliament debates and votes.	The Leader decrees; the Parliament cheers.
Law Enforcement	Police bound by the penal code.	Gestapo operates above the law.
Local Power	Elected state parliaments.	Appointed

Would you like to look closer at how the judicial system specifically was "blocked" from interfering with these policies?

In the UK

 * The Jobseekers Act (1995): This was the ultimate "hindrance." It replaced "Unemployment Benefit" with the Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA). It essentially "blocked" payments unless claimants could provide exhaustive, legal proof of job-seeking. This is all gone now as we segway back to a European normal. 

The actors involved such as, you know the names, could be the DNA of FDR's wife who resisted her husband's New England, standard European or standard Russian approach to benefits. So, how does this DNA become a Thatcher or a Rae?  

 * The Diaspora Challenge: Caribbean community groups in London (Brixton, Tottenham) and the West Midlands often faced the "blocage" of institutional racism within the DWP (Department for Work and Pensions). Many legal challenges arose from individuals claiming they were being unfairly "blocked" from benefits due to systemic bias.

 * The Krays Connection: While the Kray twins were long imprisoned by the 90s, the "culture of blocage" you mention refers to the shadow economies they built. In the absence of fair state benefits, communities sometimes turned to parallel, unofficial systems of support and "protection" that operated outside the law.

2. Ontario: Bob Rae and the "Interruption" of the Social Contract

In Ontario, Bob Rae’s Social Contract Act (1993) was a provincial "blocage" that physically and financially interrupted the benefit system.

 * The "Rae Days" Blocage: By forcing 12 unpaid days off per year for public sector workers, the very people responsible for processing benefits were absent. This created a massive backlog.

 * Regional Impacts:

   * Kingston: As a "government town" with many hospitals and prisons, the "blocage" was felt through reduced staffing and longer wait times for provincial health benefits.

   * Toronto: The Jamaican community, particularly in areas like Eglinton West and Jane and Finch, found their access to "Ontario Works" and housing benefits "interrupted" as offices struggled with frozen budgets.

   * Guelph and Orangeville: These communities saw a "blocage" in infrastructure and agricultural transfer payments, stalling local economic growth.

3. Legal Resistance: Suing the "Blocage"

You mentioned these leaders "sued the culture." In reality, it was often labor unions and community groups who sued the leaders to unblock the system.

| Case / Action | The "Blocage" | The Legal Outcome |

|---|---|---|

| OPSEU vs. Ontario (1993) | The Social Contract / Wage Freezes | Unions argued the government was "blocking" collective bargaining rights. |

| R (Reilly) v. DWP (UK) | "Workfare" (Work for benefits) | The UK Supreme Court eventually ruled that some "blocage" tactics (forcing unpaid work for benefits) were unlawful. |

| Jamaican Justice Reform | Colonial-era "Petty Sessions" | In Jamaica, the legal system itself was seen as a "blocage," leading to major justice reforms to make the law accessible to the people. |

Summary of the Conflict

The "culture of blocage" you describe represents a period where the government intentionally created friction in the social safety net to save money or change social behavior. For the Jamaican diaspora, this often felt like a targeted hindrance, leading to a long history of legal and social activism to "unblock" the rights they were owed.