From the Angel Ronan "I love Canada" Series: THIS BENEFIT PROBLEM IS LIKE A BROKEN WATER MAIN ON A NORTH AMERICAN HIGHWAY. HOW LONG COULD YOU TOLERATE IT? It's the law that benefits are to be paid equally all across Canada so the interruption of this inequality and the salaries earned pursuant to the same 30 years ago in the maintaining of this inequality could be forfeited since it was a violation of the job contracts, not just a mistake, when no one is paid to break the law. You were also told, warned not to do it. But the government employees affected by this who are vicariously liable for what happened and who didn't get their benefits in an ongoing interruption will also get their benefit arrears if any and so the benefits will be paid to every Canadian in all provinces and territories at $90,000.00 per year. There is a verbal error so we could only aspire to be a White American President since "they was" trying to tell us to believe in the American dream. This is what I like about America. It's Creole relaxed and you can say Creole things like they was and get a highway named after you but you can't graduate from Harvard High School with saying"... they was." Why don't we change the laws of grammar to help the president? But, even if we do, we should at least ensure all North Americans are getting their benefits because if they are not, that is something we can agree is super wrong as Donald says even if we can tolerate ourselves speaking badly, speaking rather badly on global TV. But, it's ok. We are big and we will eat big with a big American benefit that is at least satisfying to the market and the major company's requirements for regular, steady sales of goods. They want to buy a ticket to a basketball game in another state or country, Canada or Mexico, and fly to the game, buy their food and enjoy their hotel stays with their $ USD 70,000.00 per year as benefit which is equal to about $ CAD 90,000.00 a year per Canadian. The MLS and NBA may expand to Mexico and Puerto Rico where they have been paying at least $30,000.00 per year income support to their citizens. "They was" very happy about this. But we see it's still not resolved in Canada. We believe that the government in Canada can do something about this and comply with the Court. We cannot run a government that foments divisiveness with DNA that once strangled and beat the Nun on the native reserve for her insistent that we learn how to make the soap to wash and press the white shirt and black gowns. The white side in the same soul that today looks kind of Indiataliano very often may want revenge for her busted face but we wear rayon now that washes easy and is also easy to iron. Also we cannot strangle, starve and beat ourselves in almost exact expressiveness of the anger in this jambalaya DNA when we can at least all agree that we cannot enjoy a Go bus or a town full of near dead people. If they are near dead, it's our fault. The economy has to work. The benefit has to be paid. We cannot scapegoat the Rex. We had access to solve it. We can maybe still solve it or call someone who can. Do you still have access? Equal benefits is the law under the 14th amendment and the S.15 of the Canadian charter. We don't know what is wrong with people but we need someone with the guts, a chutney soul, to enforce the law. Donald says he understands the law about money and benefits where he does not need approval from Congress for this one so we make it work since it looks like someone or "they was_ trying to kill us off, starve us out as North Americans from within. Donald is here now and he sees Coca Cola is anathema to tariffs. Donald agrees. We cannot continue to see our economy hemorrhagic-ally lose people over the benefits. Click here.
From the Angel Ronan "I love Canada" Series:
THIS BENEFIT PROBLEM IS LIKE A BROKEN WATER MAIN ON A NORTH AMERICAN HIGHWAY. HOW LONG COULD YOU TOLERATE IT?
It's the law that benefits are to be paid equally all across Canada so the interruption of this inequality and the salaries earned pursuant to the same 30 years ago in the maintaining of this inequality could be forfeited since it was a violation of the job contracts, not just a mistake, when no one is paid to break the law. You were also told, warned not to do it. But the government employees affected by this who are vicariously liable for what happened and who didn't get their benefits in an ongoing interruption will also get their benefit arrears if any and so the benefits will be paid to every Canadian in all provinces and territories at $90,000.00 per year. There is a verbal error so we could only aspire to be a White American President since "they was" trying to tell us to believe in the American dream. This is what I like about America. It's Creole relaxed and you can say Creole things like they was and get a highway named after you but you can't graduate from Harvard High School with saying"... they was." Why don't we change the laws of grammar to help the president? But, even if we do, we should at least ensure all North Americans are getting their benefits because if they are not, that is something we can agree is super wrong as Donald says even if we can tolerate ourselves speaking badly, speaking rather badly on global TV. But, it's ok. We are big and we will eat big with a big American benefit that is at least satisfying to the market and the major company's requirements for regular, steady sales of goods. They want to buy a ticket to a basketball game in another state or country, Canada or Mexico, and fly to the game, buy their food and enjoy their hotel stays with their $ USD 70,000.00 per year as benefit which is equal to about $ CAD 90,000.00 a year per Canadian. The MLS and NBA may expand to Mexico and Puerto Rico where they have been paying at least $30,000.00 per year income support to their citizens. "They was" very happy about this. But we see it's still not resolved in Canada. We believe that the government in Canada can do something about this and comply with the Court. We cannot run a government that foments divisiveness with DNA that once strangled and beat the Nun on the native reserve for her insistent that we learn how to make the soap to wash and press the white shirt and black gowns. The white side in the same soul that today looks kind of Indiataliano very often may want revenge for her busted face but we wear rayon now that washes easy and is also easy to iron. Also we cannot strangle, starve and beat ourselves in almost exact expressiveness of the anger in this jambalaya DNA when we can at least all agree that we cannot enjoy a Go bus or a town full of near dead people. If they are near dead, it's our fault. The economy has to work. The benefit has to be paid. We cannot scapegoat the Rex. We had access to solve it. We can maybe still solve it or call someone who can. Do you still have access? Equal benefits is the law under the 14th amendment and the S.15 of the Canadian charter. We don't know what is wrong with people but we need someone with the guts, a chutney soul, to enforce the law. Donald says he understands the law about money and benefits where he does not need approval from Congress for this one so we make it work since it looks like someone or "they was_ trying to kill us off, starve us out as North Americans from within. Donald is here now and he sees Coca Cola is anathema to tariffs. Donald agrees. We cannot continue to see our economy hemorrhagic-ally lose people over the benefits.
A Photograph of the Canadian Parliament and Cabinet. It's a nice photo. (. )
This is a photo of the local McDonald's Restaurant team and Management in your area. Look at them hustle. It's a nice photo. (. ).
This is a photo of the Operations team that will get Canada going pursuant to the laws. (. ).
Yet, we are not fighting Iran but ourselves when the benefits are not paid to our people and then the Iranians come to live in Canada or the UK as refugees that thrive over us with their Iranian benefits that covers them and enables them to help themselves and their people regardless of how the English bank may hold their UK benefits and never credit their UK bank account. The pay the rent for the fish and chips shop and then they buy the building, buy the whole block. So, the English guy who is probably a White African, innit?, after all the wars has an Iranian landlord. You see in some parts of the UK, there are four kebab shops and one fish and chips shop on the main high road; on average. This is because the population determines the market for food, the demand for food. But, we can do something right since now we see the issue and it won't matter tomorrow since the kebab is here to stay. We will have enough to buy more and these people are making many babies, some white and some black, who will have the taste for kebabs and who will.pray and wash their hands after football with their Nikes or Diadoras on; innit? So we pay the benefits.
The UK people are disappearing because of it. As such, the Iranian and other foreigners with their more certain national benefits fill the vacancy in population that the fraudulent Canadian employees have created in not paying the benefits to Canadians. Since there is a Court order on the issue, it's contempt of Court. It must be paid equally to all citizens. But, you started this game in 1980 on the day of the wedding of the current Rex with Diana in the UK and Canada to only ask what he will do, as if to park a social and economic time bomb at his front door. But you cause the problem in your alleged job with access to government matters and then you criticise him. You suggest you would take the country and break away to leave in some declaration of independence but you can't leave when you are not a state; nor are you an independent country and how do you say you would leave when you are guilty for the benefit mess? This is written by you as a Canadian who has finally confessed. You are a hero. You will send the benefits tomorrow.
McDonalds has been more determined to use the best of everything to provide services and product. The government, however is the only legal entity that takes more than 14% of everything. But, its not working as we would expect. We see the golden rule in school as financed by the government but we do not see it in the national or provincial benefits. There is an unusual kingdom within a kingdom phenomena as to active works that defy policy. "Ontario Works" is that phenomena or activity in defiance of S.15 of the Charter so its unconstitutional and you would not use a notwithstanding clause for this in "spite" so people have to suffer unequal treatment in Kingston or Orangeville or Halton where the benefits are not paid. We should not try to rationalize it. The purpose of the benefit is not to foster desperate congestion. It is to keep people moving and ensure there is no hungry crowding around Toronto with people hiding in subway tunnels and then trying to take a house when people are on vacation. IF they have money, they can keep moving. Nonetheless, we see that if overcrowding was your concern, you would never have built soo many buildings in the GTA. You intend to see people and lots people. Your attitudes toward this benefit have been unsupported by any rationale. We need for our lives. We need it paid equally. That is the law. That is the culture. Anything else is appalling and unjustifiable; shoo! See that there are already rulings on this issue. See:
- Quebec (Attorney General) v. Alliance du personnel professionnel et technique de la santé et des services sociaux, 2018 SCC 17: A landmark pay equity case and one of the few successful s. 15(1) claims based on sex prior to Fraser, focusing on gender-based wage discrimination.
- Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61: Established that providing services to the public must ensure equal access to benefits, often cited in conjunction with adverse impact discrimination cases.
- Withler v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 12: Addressed the"appropriate comparator" analysis for section 15 claims, emphasizing a substantive, not formalistic, approach to benefit equality.
- British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU, 1999 SCC 32 (Meiorin): While an employment law case, it set the standard for testing if discriminatory standards (like physical fitness tests) are bona fide occupational requirements, heavily influencing the "adverse impact" analysis in Fraser.
- Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission), 1987 SCC 79 (Action Travail des Femmes): A foundational case establishing that systemic discrimination must be remedied, even if not intentionally designed to exclude, closely aligning with the principles in Fraser.
Why would you do that; dammit Patricio Brown? I think we should give him an award and degree from Northwestern University or from Carlton University; the best in politics. If the charter says benefits must be essentially equal with some differences we agree to for disabilities, then how do I ask you to sign up for a program that confirms you have no money because you did not get the benefits others received and then pay you less ($10,000.00 per year) than those who actually receive the benefit at $30000.00 per year. The kid who applied for Ontario Works suffered a fraud by his father who wanted to receive all the benefits in the family. The system has to be prepared for these fraudsters and their way or rule cannot over rule the love and order of the king. You are getting $30000.00 per year without interruption living next door. As to equality across the country, this number is too low and should approximate $90,000.00 per year; give or take a few thousand so it might be $87000.00 or $92000.00 per year. $90000.00 per year is fine paid to your bank account at $7500.00 per year. If its not working like this, who decides that it is not working? If it comes to benefits, we could design a system that provides a presto benefit card that will pay the monthly cash benefits to the card immediately for debit payments until you may opt online in the presto benefit system to have the benefits paid to your bank account. The system would also pay all equally. If you have arrears, you can make claim for those arrears on the presto benefit system and opt for the number of years to see the pay down of those arrears from 1 year up to 30 years. This is not difficult once we see how much we pay civil servants; sometimes $2,000,000.00 per year. So arrears of $ 1,200,000.00 etc is not an issue if its just the benefit we are receiving together so we can go on a ski trip as grade 8 alumni friends in our 40's etc. Bring your family. You can opt to see your benefits in the presto system pay the benefit daily, weekly, every two weeks or monthly. In those emergencies where you have lost your bank or presto benefit card, you could use your health card for payment at the store. If you offered some kid to be the Boss of... and hope to steal his benefits to see him dead for your ego and for your sins, how does that work when its your sin and adding one more can't really help to clear it? There is no deal. But if you can build such intelligent new subways that are designed to save people, keep people safe, then you can design benefit systems that keep people safe. The Kingdom is maintained sometimes by violence and when interrupted by hatred and the evil, The Kingdom removes the interruptions; to take it back by force.
Click here.
The whole Canadian experience is kind of a fraud. We sing and cheer for the sports teams. We spend money for flags and sheets. They dress up for the games and fix the hair really nice and smile for the cameras. All of this happens and then many Canadians are not receiving their benefits. If the MP knew that there is just one Canadian that is not receiving their benefit, we believe he would resolve it the next day so that all the Canadians received their benefits equally or what else is he doing and why?
We thank them for their assistance.
It’s incredibly frustrating to feel like there is a "performance" of national pride while the basic systems that are supposed to support citizens aren't functioning. When you see the pomp and circumstance of sports or public events, it can feel like a slap in the face if you're struggling to navigate a bureaucracy that feels indifferent to your actual needs.
How would you feel about a politician named Sayed, Johnson or Geronimo that does not help your friends get their benefits? They have known for months after recieving assistance requests from him and also after recieving information from the local benefits office. You see the benefit all others are recieving is not a matter of means testing qualifications above the basic evidence of citizenship. You get it when you are a citizen. On the day of provision in 1985, he was living in the right town in Ontario.
Your frustration with your Member of Parliament (MP) is shared by many. The expectation is that they are your direct line to the government—the person who fixes the "glitch in the machine."
Why isn't the MP fixing it "the next day"?
While it should be that simple, here is a bit of insight into why these delays happen and what your MP is actually doing:
* Jurisdictional Separation: Often, the benefits people are missing are provincial (like ODSP or OHIP) while your MP handles federal issues (like EI, CPP, or CRA). If you contact an MP about a provincial issue, they technically have no power over it, and vice versa for an MPP.
* The "Case File" Process: When you bring a problem to an MP, their staff opens a Constituency Case. They have "hotlines" to government agencies, but they are still subject to the same backlogs as everyone else. They can't usually override the law; they can only force a human to actually look at your file.
* Policy vs. Individual Fixes: MPs spend their time in Ottawa debating laws (the "big picture"). Unfortunately, this often takes them away from the "small picture"—the individual Canadian who hasn't received a cheque.
How to hold them accountable
If you or someone you know is being denied benefits, the "smiling for the camera" doesn't help. Here is how you can move past the fluff:
* The "In-Person" Squeaky Wheel: Emails are easy to ignore. Calling the constituency office and requesting an in-person meeting with the Caseworker (not just the MP) is often more effective.
* The Taxpayer Ombudsman: If the CRA is the issue, there is a specific office (the Office of the Taxpayers’ Ombudsman) designed to handle these failures when the MP route isn't working.
* Media and Public Record: Sometimes, reminding an MP that "one Canadian not receiving benefits" is a news story helps speed up their "next day" timeline.
It’s valid to feel like the "Canadian experience" is out of sync with reality when the safety net has holes in it.
This is not the service we are paying for though as we are believing in the politicians to give life to our expectations of law and compliance with that law.
Comments
Post a Comment