The Evening Briefing 23/05/2026 Lork Region is a problem area. They said and abet the murders of an Yvonne Tsong. Her only weapon is the expectation of racism and a pirate in police uniform paid to do her bidding. We cant have a senior officer or a junior officer that has not paid their parking tickets, that has not paid his car insurance and then he continues to drive. We are still learning just what we expect of the job. The Senior officers will tell us what we normally do in this type of situation even if we are all family here; right? But what would you want? If it's personal property of a citizen that was abandoned in public, we investigate and charge the person responsible for the abandonment. We charge them for the break in. We charge them for the possession of stolen property. We charge them for the threatening. We may have given the thief a copy of the items abandoned ( photos on a memory key) since we were temporarily confused by his breathing in the police station. His breathing says he could be your father but he does not really respect anything and that now you are confused. The problem with this is that it is still property belonging to another; the abandoned items. It is also evidence with his finger prints on the original photos. The essential job description is to serve and protect. This is not serving and protecting if; that is if we have not returned the property to the client citizens. It was stolen from his home. You will now at least provide a copy of the memory key to the citizen. You will notify him to pick it up at a station and we will provide all the abandoned items to the client citizen.

 The Evening Briefing 23/05/2026

Lork Region is a problem area. They said and abet the murders of an Yvonne Tsong. Her only weapon is the expectation of racism and a pirate in police uniform paid to do her bidding. 

We cant have a senior officer or a junior officer that has not paid their parking tickets, that has not paid his car insurance and then he continues to drive. 

We are still learning just what we expect of the job. The Senior officers will tell us what we normally do in this type of situation even if we are all family here; right? But what would you want? 

If it's personal property of a citizen that was abandoned in public, we investigate and charge the person responsible for the abandonment. We charge them for the break in.  We charge them for the possession of stolen property. We charge them for the threatening. We may have given the thief a copy of the items abandoned ( photos on a memory key) since we were temporarily confused by his breathing in the police station.  His breathing says he could be your father but he does not really respect anything and that now you are confused.

The problem with this is that it is still property belonging to another; the abandoned items.  It is also evidence with his finger prints on the original photos.  The essential job description is to serve and protect. This is not serving and protecting if; that is if  we have not returned the property to the client citizens. It was stolen  from his home.  You will now at least  provide a copy of the memory key to the citizen. You will notify him to pick it up at a station and we will provide all the abandoned items to the client citizen. 

 In the early decades, ignoring a parking ticket was incredibly common because the system simply didn't have the teeth it does today. If drivers in the 1930s, '40s, or '50s collectively decided to resist and just throw their tickets in the trash, they usually got away with it—at least for a while.

However, as the unpaid tickets piled up, cities fought back by escalating the stakes from minor annoyances to actual arrest warrants, and eventually, the ultimate weapon: holding your license plate hostage.

Here is how the battle between non-paying drivers and Ontario municipalities played out over the decades:

### 1. The 1930s: Mass Evasion (and Getting Away With It)

Before parking meters, the system relied entirely on paper trails and police officer memory. In the 1930s, if you didn't pay your summons, the city had to manually track you down and take you to police court.

Because this took an immense amount of police power, municipalities routinely let non-payers slide. As mentioned, when Ottawa issued 14,000 parking notices in 1937, only 900 people paid. The rest simply ignored them, realizing the city didn't have the administrative capacity to drag 13,000 people into a courtroom over a 50-cent or $1 fine.

### 2. The 1940s–1950s: The Warrant Stage (Cops at Your Door)

Once Sudbury, Toronto, and other cities brought in parking meters, the volume of tickets exploded, and cities could no longer afford to let people ignore them. If you chose not to pay a ticket in the 1940s or '50s, the resistance met a harsh reality:

 * **Registered Mail:** First, a final notice would be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle.

 * **Summons to Court:** If ignored, it became a formal court summons. Because a parking violation was treated as a quasi-criminal provincial or municipal offense back then, failing to show up to court for a summons was a serious matter.

 * **Arrest Warrants:** If you still refused to pay, a magistrate would issue a **bench warrant** for your arrest.

It was not uncommon in the 1950s for police officers to show up at a driver's home or workplace to arrest them over a stack of unpaid parking tickets. You would be brought before a judge and given a choice: pay the accumulated fines (which had now multiplied with court costs) or spend a few days in the local jail.

### 3. The 1970s: The Ultimate Checkmate (Plate Denial)

By the 1970s, the volume of cars was staggering, and tracking down thousands of drivers with arrest warrants was breaking the court system. Drivers were still hoarding unpaid tickets in their gloveboxes as a form of casual resistance.

To end the game once and for all, Ontario changed the law. They realized they didn't need to arrest you; they just needed to wait for you to come to them.

The province linked municipal parking computers directly to the Ministry of Transportation's vehicle registry. They introduced **License Plate Denial**: if you had even one outstanding, unpaid parking ticket under your name, the province would refuse to renew your vehicle registration or issue your license plate sticker.

> **The Modern Reality:** Today, the resistance has effectively been engineered out of the system. If you don't pay a parking ticket in Ontario now, it never goes to criminal court, but it automatically blocks your plate renewal, gets sent to a private collections agency, and can severely damage your personal credit score.

> /////

Parking infractions were tracked long before the modern "yellow slip" ticket existed.

In Ontario, the enforcement of parking regulations began as soon as cars started taking over city streets from horses in the early 1900s. However, the system evolved in two distinct stages: the early restriction era and the modern parking meter era.

### 1. The Early Era: Written Summonses (1920s–1930s)

Before dedicated parking tickets, overstaying your welcome at a curb was treated as a general traffic violation under early municipal bylaws or the *Highway Traffic Act* (established in Ontario in 1923).

By the 1930s, major cities like Ottawa and Toronto had strict 30-minute or 1-hour parking limits in downtown cores to keep traffic moving. If you overstayed, a police officer would physically write down your license plate and issue a court summons. For perspective, **in 1937 alone, Ottawa police handed out 14,000 parking violations** under this time-limit rule—though the system was so inefficient that only about 900 people actually ended up paying fines!

### 2. The Modern Era: Coin-Operated Violations (1939–1950s)

The mechanical parking ticket system we recognize today was born alongside the **parking meter**, which gave officers an instant, undeniable visual cue (a red flag) that a vehicle was in violation.

 * **Sudbury Leads the Way (1939):** Sudbury, Ontario, has the distinction of being the **very first municipality in Canada** to install mechanical parking meters. They adopted them in late 1939 to manage intense downtown congestion, meaning the first automated "meter maid" style parking violations in the province happened right there.

 * **The Rest of Ontario Follows:** Other cities slowly joined the trend after seeing Sudbury's success. Kingston, Oshawa, and Windsor installed meters and automated enforcement systems in the late 1940s.

 * **Toronto's Rollout (1952):** Toronto resisted the change for years, but finally installed its first 11 curbside parking meters on February 6, 1952, on James Street (right next to Old City Hall). Within a week, 1,300 meters were active across downtown, turning parking enforcement into a massive, streamlined municipal operation.

Initially, these tickets were treated as minor criminal or provincial offences. It wasn't until later decades—specifically with the introduction of Ontario's *Provincial Offences Act*—that parking tickets were entirely decoupled from the criminal court system and turned into the administrative fines we deal with today.