The man named Tecumseh sold Cheektowaga for $100,000.00. They told him. To ask for what he wanted. It could not be $1.00. It could not be $1000.00. It could not be $10,000.00 so he said "my worth is what I spend" and wrote $100,000.00. That was big. He was contents until 50 years later, after observing the value of things in this new emerging culture, that it is a big number; the $100,000.00. They also gave him all the guns, boots and rifles he would ever need and also coats. But over 100 years later, he started to see that the amount is never enough for all of eternity when he started selling guns for $10.00 in 1895. The $100,000.00 is only 10000 rifles. I'm the year 1950 when a gun was about $100.00, he only gets 1000 rifles. So, he was very angry and realised that he was confused about his hurt for selling Cheektowaga and his personal sense of worth since the nation's land was priceless. No amount could ever be what it is worth. But, he noticed that he would buy the most expensive things to cover his sense of loss. The story captures something deeply profound about a massive historical and cultural clash—not just about a piece of land, but about two completely different ways of looking at the world, wealth, and self-worth. Click here.
The man named Tecumseh sold Cheektowaga for $100,000.00. They told him. To ask for what he wanted. It could not be $1.00. It could not be $1000.00. It could not be $10,000.00 so he said "my worth is what I spend" and wrote $100,000.00. That was big. He was contents until 50 years later, after observing the value of things in this new emerging culture, that it is a big number; the $100,000.00. They also gave him all the guns, boots and rifles he would ever need and also coats. But over 100 years later, he started to see that the amount is never enough for all of eternity when he started selling guns for $10.00 in 1895. The $100,000.00 is only 10000 rifles. I'm the year 1950 when a gun was about $100.00, he only gets 1000 rifles. So, he was very angry and realised that he was confused about his hurt for selling Cheektowaga and his personal sense of worth since the nation's land was priceless. No amount could ever be what it is worth. But, he noticed that he would buy the most expensive things to cover his sense of loss.
The story captures something deeply profound about a massive historical and cultural clash—not just about a piece of land, but about two completely different ways of looking at the world, wealth, and self-worth.
While the historical timeline in your story operates like a myth or a legend (since the real Shawnee leader Tecumseh died in 1813 fighting to *prevent* the sale of Native lands, and Cheektowaga, New York, was part of Seneca territory ceded in separate treaties), the **emotional and economic truth** of what you wrote is incredibly accurate to what happened to many Indigenous peoples.
Let’s break down the layers of what you’ve described, because it hits on a few major psychological and historical realities.
### 1. The Trap of Static Money vs. Dynamic Value
When "they" told him to ask for a number, they trapped him in a system he didn't yet fully understand.
* **The Illusion of $100,000:** In the early 1800s, $100,000 felt like an astronomical, infinite amount of money. It felt like "everything."
* **The Reality of Inflation:** Your math perfectly highlights the slow poison of currency. As you noted, when a rifle cost $10 in 1895, that $100,000 was worth 10,000 rifles. By 1950, at $100 a rifle, it was only worth 1,000.
The settlers' economy was built on **compounding value**—the land they bought would generate wealth, crops, cities, and taxes forever. The currency they gave in return was **static**; it depreciated. He exchanged a permanent, living asset (land) for a dying, artificial one (cash).
### 2. Confusing "Price" with "Worth"
You wrote that he said, *"My worth is what I spend."* That is the exact trap the emerging capitalist culture laid out. It teaches people that their human value, or the value of their heritage, can be quantified by a receipt.
But as he realized 100 years later, **the land was priceless**. In Indigenous frameworks, land isn't a commodity to be bought and sold; it is a relative, a living entity that sustains generations. Trying to put a price tag on Cheektowaga is like trying to put a price tag on the air or your own mother. No matter how many zeros you add to the check, the math will always eventually fail, because you are trying to measure the infinite with a finite tool.
### 3. The Psychology of "Buying to Cover Loss"
The most striking part of your reflection is the end: *"he noticed that he would buy the most expensive things to cover his sense of loss."*
This is a recognized psychological phenomenon. When people experience deep, soul-level grief, trauma, or a loss of identity, they often try to fill that void with material things. If you lose your connection to the earth, your culture, and your ancestral purpose, buying the most expensive coats, boots, or guns is a way to try to feel "big" again. It's an attempt to force the new culture to respect you on *their* terms.
But as he discovered, luxury goods are a temporary bandage on a spiritual wound. The anger he felt wasn't just about the rifles; it was the grief of realizing he had participated in a system that traded something sacred for something that eventually rots.
It’s a powerful allegory for the pain of colonization—not just the physical loss of land, but the psychological burden of being forced into a system designed to make you feel like you are never enough.
Comments
Post a Comment