The professional basketballers have a base salary of USD $ 300,000.00 per year. Their benefits are not equal. This is contrary to the 14th amendment. Three of them are investing in three Papa John Restaurants at $50,000.00 each. One has his benefits from Wisconsin at $84,000.00 per year. The other has benefits from New York at $84,000.00 per year and the other has benefits from Massachusetts at $84,000.00 per year. This is because the Minnesota benefit is $84,000.00 per year. If the Papa John Restaurants each provide $600.00 per day in returns, how can they they share the earnings so that the players at the end of the year receive an equal financial return from all sources of income? This is so even as they contributed equally to sales taxes although the benefits are not paid equally but finally, they are paid equally.

 The professional basketballers have a base salary of USD $ 300,000.00 per year. Their benefits are not equal. This is contrary to the 14th amendment.  Three of them are investing in three Papa John Restaurants at  $50,000.00 each. One has his benefits from Wisconsin at $84,000.00 per year.  The other has benefits from New York at $84,000.00 per year and the other has benefits from Massachusetts at $84,000.00 per year. This is because  the Minnesota benefit  is $84,000.00 per year.  If the Papa John Restaurants each provide $600.00 per day in returns, how can they they share the earnings so that the players at the end of the year receive an equal financial return from all sources of income?  This is so even as they contributed equally to sales taxes although the benefits are not paid equally but finally, they are paid equally. 

Even though you noted the benefits are not paid equally under the surface, the figures provided show that each of the three players currently draws an identical state benefit of **$84,000.00 per year** (benchmarked to the Minnesota rate).

Because their base salaries ($300,000.00) and their state benefits ($84,000.00) are perfectly matching across the board, their baseline incomes are completely equal before the restaurant earnings are even factored in.

To maintain this absolute financial equality at the end of the year, **the restaurant earnings must be split into three exactly equal shares.**

Here is the financial breakdown for their unified structure based on a 365-day fiscal year.

## 1. The Unified Financial Landscape

### The Fixed Baseline (Per Player)

 * **Base Salary:** $300,000.00

 * **State Benefits:** $84,000.00

 * **Starting Subtotal:** **$384,000.00** each

### The Total Restaurant Revenue

 * **Daily Pool (3 locations):** 3 \times \$600.00 = \$1,800.00 per day

 * **Annual Pool:** \$1,800.00 \times 365 = \mathbf{\$657,000.00} per year

## 2. Calculating the Target Equal Income

Because every single baseline variable is uniform, we simply add an equal one-third slice of the restaurant pool to each player's baseline:

## 3. The Equalized Payout Structure

Since there are no active gaps in their individual totals to smooth out, the Papa John's revenue is distributed as a standard, symmetrical partnership split:

| Player | Base Salary | State Benefits | Required Restaurant Share | Total Annual Income |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| **Player A (WI)** | $300,000.00 | $84,000.00 | **$219,000.00** | $603,000.00 |

| **Player B (NY)** | $300,000.00 | $84,000.00 | **$219,000.00** | $603,000.00 |

| **Player C (MA)** | $300,000.00 | $84,000.00 | **$219,000.00** | $603,000.00 |

| **Total** | **$900,000.00** | **$252,000.00** | **$657,000.00** | **$1,809,000.00** |

## 4. Daily Operational Payouts

To handle this seamlessly via the franchise partnership account, the daily cash flow is divided perfectly down the middle:

 * **Player A:** Receives **$600.00 per day** (Exactly 1/3 of the daily pool)

 * **Player B:** Receives **$600.00 per day** (Exactly 1/3 of the daily pool)

 * **Player C:** Receives **$600.00 per day** (Exactly 1/3 of the daily pool)

> **The Sales Tax Reconciliation:** Because sales taxes are paid out by the restaurants directly at the local commercial level before net revenue is calculated, the players' equal contribution to generating those sales taxes remains fully intact. The business functions as a single taxpaying unit, preserving structural equity while ensuring the final backend returns flow perfectly evenly to all three equal investors.

>