CLICK HERE. Let's make a billion dollar 1% National US Federal Sales tax deal in a stark, visceral picture of the modern presidency—less an office of systemic solutions and more a theater of grievance. Your metaphor of the "dog with a sore thorn paw" perfectly captures a leadership style driven by vindication and personal injury rather than the statesmanship required to actually fix the engine of the country. But this is a critique only of the most difficult Presidents; all of them already passed on. But if the shoe fits, lets see what we can do to solve America today. Let's coordinate the phenomenon of income support money in America. There is some income support but it is not sufficiently (I 94, I 60, I 90, I 95 ) coordinated and consistent like the highway system. But you want us to believe that you are serious, you mean 'business", to be "business like" globally and economically that you are serious about internal security. A lack of sufficient money per citizen causes internal territorial insecurity. It's your first concern before you start displacing your national failures with talk about other nations. As we fumble around to solve this, we see a well dressed, celebrated office of dysfunctionality running around Maryland and Virginia in a big armoured vehicle. Has England suffered some poison by this phenomenon if the tea water at the White House is served at Twiddleham, poisoning the mind of the regals so that they might be equal. But England means to win this like the Economy Tourney. It has the physical territory from the Orkneys; all the way to BC and it has maybe all of CUSMA to show what it can do...with a deal that benefits all. But certainly no one goes without or suffers in a lack of money. Your frustration with this performative "scavenger culture" is valid, and your instinct to look for an economic "umbrella proposal" that directly empowers the working class is the exact logic behind Universal Basic Income (UBI) and demand-side economics. When the working class has capital, they spend it on necessities—diapers, coffee, tires, debt repayment—and business booms. But if we can't agree to this, war is good for the civic health of the nation. You should as white men want to be financially plugged into the world of good opportunities with other white people like maybe a Scandinavian girl you might meet on the Euro Rail. She has enough benefits money and you have enough benefits money. You click in conversation and you both decide to do this. But right now you are from New Jersey with $ USD 20,000.00 per year benefits or you are from Toronto with no benefits. But you have a phallicism in all your use of government funds to build new condo units through agreement that a portion of the units are for public housing. What about a niche benefit of $2500.00 per month and this is what they want; they the regal people. However, while your philosophical diagnosis of the political system is sharp, the specific math in your proposal hits a wall when we look at the macroeconomic reality. ## The Math Behind $0.20 a Minute Your calculation on the payout is perfectly accurate. If we treat this as a continuous 24/7 payment: * **$0.20/minute** = $12/hour * **$12/hour** = $288/day * **$288/day** = **$105,120/year** (or exactly $8,760/month) Handing over $100k+ a year to every citizen would certainly change lives overnight, but funding it with a 1% national sales tax is mathematically impossible. ## The Funding Disconnect To see why, we have to look at the total scale of the US economy: * **The Cost:** Paying $105,120 a year to roughly 335 million Americans would cost about **$35.2 trillion every single year**. * **The Revenue:** Total US consumer spending is currently around $19 trillion annually. A 1% national sales tax on *everything* bought in the US would generate about **$190 billion**. * **The Gap:** Your 1% tax would only cover about **0.5%** of the cost of the program. For context, the entire US GDP—the value of every single good and service produced in the country in a year—is only about $27 trillion. The program you are proposing costs more than the entire country produces. ## The Inflation Trap Even if we could magically print the $35 trillion a year to fund this without taxes, we would hit the other problem with the "rising tide" analogy: **inflation**. Money only has value relative to the goods and services available to buy. If every single American suddenly receives an extra $8,760 a month, but the actual number of tires, loaves of bread, and apartments doesn't drastically increase, the tide doesn't just lift the boats—it lifts the *prices*. If a landlord knows every applicant suddenly has an extra $8,700 a month, rent goes up..Une by an extra $50 to $100.00 per month. If he has 300 tenants, he is getting roughly an extra $15000.00 to $30000.00 per month. If everyone can suddenly afford a new set of tires, but the factories are still producing the same number of tires, the price of tires skyrockets until only a fraction of people can afford them again. The new money would rapidly lose its purchasing power, leaving people right back where they started. The desire for a leader who abandons "pomp and circumstance" to actually ensure citizens can afford to live is exactly what politics should be about. But true economic solutions require balancing the scale—you cannot distribute wealth that exceeds the total value of what the economy actually produces. The Presidency is reflective of a scavenger culture that disguises itself with enough pomp and circumstances. It is impotent as to solving essential national problems or it does not intend to. It kind of says you can look to this figure but he is expected that he could solve any national umbrella problems with an umbrella proposal but he is like a dog with a sore thorn paw that was shot before the thorn was removed and he wants you to know this. He is not an economic leader with enough wealth and worship in his soul to regally, help those less fortunate but is more a figure of sore vindictive, vindicated want but he can't really see that as an alleged business owner that the sales tax collected at 1% nationally is a national God send and that the income benefit support paid at .20 cents a minute to every American or North American. All boats rise in a rising tide and this truth is the only truth for business owners in America. .20 cents a minute works out to $8760.00 per month to pay the loans you owe to Donald, to buy the diapers, to buy the coffee, to buy the bread and pay for the new tires. Mexico is not Black and nor is Greenland and to say you will associate Mexico in an obligation to pay a benefit under CUSMA is not to make one blacker than the the ink or paper used to write the CUSMA deal. It makes you effective. CUSMA stands for Canada, US and Mexico. If you like, we can ask Greenland to be the auditor of the new CUSMA regulations ( The D and V Finance Regulations to be the enforcer of an existing UN mandate and set regular policy for the region on the issue of income support to be the big daddy) since association to Greenland makes me feel more right and white and less Latino, beautiful, intelligent and Spanish if that is what you want to say. What is it that you did really want to say? Instead, we will try to build a Daffy Duck Bridge at the Strait of Hormuz and talk about it all day to see our authority and power in and over cultures in the ancient world as a Babylonian scavenging beast of no love, no nation. We see them, found them again. The world is coming to live among and not only the soldiers must look well kitted out or the national US team footballer but we must all feel and look good as we represent our love for the Afro European benefits culture. It began in Africa or at least in Rome as run in it's origin by Africans; the Egyptian guy. If America was run by a real Swedish guy or Portugal or Italian guy how would it look? How would the landscape look, the benefits landscape? Everybody in Italy gets the benefits. Everybody in England is intended to get the benefits. But they don't get them. The Regal persons may have asked that this be resolved by the PM Johnson. It was just to ensure the citizens receive the money already sent with all intentions that it be paid. Johnson cut the benefit value in two and made it a means tested program and that is not what the Regals wanted; just only that the benefits will not be held indefinitely by the bank of there is My technological reason why this is happening. So now to see the will of the regals as they will have it, they will.....where is the torture stockade in the Zero Dark Thirty styling? Just Allow it mate, Allow it. Apple 🍏 🍎 is spawning perfectly some kind of emotional impediments, some physical symptomatic, manifesting as a nerve pain and you are supposed to not understand this. Ask if you could get a chance to run a busy diner as an apple phone user and all you had to do is send $100 a day to a church in Biloxi and you know how much you earned collecting there but the account had $200 of her own funds in it while she had collected $1500 by 12:30 pm; a mixed fund So is the the 100 dollars to be sent a part of her money or the money collected? She moved her money out of the account and saw the 1500.00 clearly as the money collected there and so she felt sure to send the 100 to Biloxi. But some how you could send it and you were not taken for fraud and trespass.
CLICK HERE.
Let's make a billion dollar 1% National US Federal Sales tax deal in a stark, visceral picture of the modern presidency—less an office of systemic solutions and more a theater of grievance. Your metaphor of the "dog with a sore thorn paw" perfectly captures a leadership style driven by vindication and personal injury rather than the statesmanship required to actually fix the engine of the country. But this is a critique only of the most difficult Presidents; all of them already passed on. But if the shoe fits, lets see what we can do to solve America today. Let's coordinate the phenomenon of income support money in America. There is some income support but it is not sufficiently (I 94, I 60, I 90, I 95 ) coordinated and consistent like the highway system. But you want us to believe that you are serious, you mean 'business", to be "business like" globally and economically that you are serious about internal security. A lack of sufficient money per citizen causes internal territorial insecurity. It's your first concern before you start displacing your national failures with talk about other nations. As we fumble around to solve this, we see a well dressed, celebrated office of dysfunctionality running around Maryland and Virginia in a big armoured vehicle. Has England suffered some poison by this phenomenon if the tea water at the White House is served at Twiddleham, poisoning the mind of the regals so that they might be equal. But England means to win this like the Economy Tourney. It has the physical territory from the Orkneys; all the way to BC and it has maybe all of CUSMA to show what it can do...with a deal that benefits all. But certainly no one goes without or suffers in a lack of money.
Your frustration with this performative "scavenger culture" is valid, and your instinct to look for an economic "umbrella proposal" that directly empowers the working class is the exact logic behind Universal Basic Income (UBI) and demand-side economics. When the working class has capital, they spend it on necessities—diapers, coffee, tires, debt repayment—and business booms. But if we can't agree to this, war is good for the civic health of the nation. You should as white men want to be financially plugged into the world of good opportunities with other white people like maybe a Scandinavian girl you might meet on the Euro Rail. She has enough benefits money and you have enough benefits money. You click in conversation and you both decide to do this. But right now you are from New Jersey with $ USD 20,000.00 per year benefits or you are from Toronto with no benefits. But you have a phallicism in all your use of government funds to build new condo units through agreement that a portion of the units are for public housing. What about a niche benefit of $2500.00 per month and this is what they want; they the regal people.
However, while your philosophical diagnosis of the political system is sharp, the specific math in your proposal hits a wall when we look at the macroeconomic reality.
## The Math Behind $0.20 a Minute
Your calculation on the payout is perfectly accurate. If we treat this as a continuous 24/7 payment:
* **$0.20/minute** = $12/hour
* **$12/hour** = $288/day
* **$288/day** = **$105,120/year** (or exactly $8,760/month)
Handing over $100k+ a year to every citizen would certainly change lives overnight, but funding it with a 1% national sales tax is mathematically impossible.
## The Funding Disconnect
To see why, we have to look at the total scale of the US economy:
* **The Cost:** Paying $105,120 a year to roughly 335 million Americans would cost about **$35.2 trillion every single year**.
* **The Revenue:** Total US consumer spending is currently around $19 trillion annually. A 1% national sales tax on *everything* bought in the US would generate about **$190 billion**.
* **The Gap:** Your 1% tax would only cover about **0.5%** of the cost of the program. For context, the entire US GDP—the value of every single good and service produced in the country in a year—is only about $27 trillion. The program you are proposing costs more than the entire country produces.
## The Inflation Trap
Even if we could magically print the $35 trillion a year to fund this without taxes, we would hit the other problem with the "rising tide" analogy: **inflation**.
Money only has value relative to the goods and services available to buy. If every single American suddenly receives an extra $8,760 a month, but the actual number of tires, loaves of bread, and apartments doesn't drastically increase, the tide doesn't just lift the boats—it lifts the *prices*.
If a landlord knows every applicant suddenly has an extra $8,700 a month, rent goes up..Une by an extra $50 to $100.00 per month. If he has 300 tenants, he is getting roughly an extra $15000.00 to $30000.00 per month.
If everyone can suddenly afford a new set of tires, but the factories are still producing the same number of tires, the price of tires skyrockets until only a fraction of people can afford them again. The new money would rapidly lose its purchasing power, leaving people right back where they started.
The desire for a leader who abandons "pomp and circumstance" to actually ensure citizens can afford to live is exactly what politics should be about. But true economic solutions require balancing the scale—you cannot distribute wealth that exceeds the total value of what the economy actually produces.
The Presidency is reflective of a scavenger culture that disguises itself with enough pomp and circumstances. It is impotent as to solving essential national problems or it does not intend to. It kind of says you can look to this figure but he is expected that he could solve any national umbrella problems with an umbrella proposal but he is like a dog with a sore thorn paw that was shot before the thorn was removed and he wants you to know this. He is not an economic leader with enough wealth and worship in his soul to regally, help those less fortunate but is more a figure of sore vindictive, vindicated want but he can't really see that as an alleged business owner that the sales tax collected at 1% nationally is a national God send and that the income benefit support paid at .20 cents a minute to every American or North American. All boats rise in a rising tide and this truth is the only truth for business owners in America. .20 cents a minute works out to $8760.00 per month to pay the loans you owe to Donald, to buy the diapers, to buy the coffee, to buy the bread and pay for the new tires. Mexico is not Black and nor is Greenland and to say you will associate Mexico in an obligation to pay a benefit under CUSMA is not to make one blacker than the the ink or paper used to write the CUSMA deal. It makes you effective. CUSMA stands for Canada, US and Mexico. If you like, we can ask Greenland to be the auditor of the new CUSMA regulations ( The D and V Finance Regulations to be the enforcer of an existing UN mandate and set regular policy for the region on the issue of income support to be the big daddy) since association to Greenland makes me feel more right and white and less Latino, beautiful, intelligent and Spanish if that is what you want to say. What is it that you did really want to say? Instead, we will try to build a Daffy Duck Bridge at the Strait of Hormuz and talk about it all day to see our authority and power in and over cultures in the ancient world as a Babylonian scavenging beast of no love, no nation. We see them, found them again. The world is coming to live among and not only the soldiers must look well kitted out or the national US team footballer but we must all feel and look good as we represent our love for the Afro European benefits culture. It began in Africa or at least in Rome as run in it's origin by Africans; the Egyptian guy.
If America was run by a real Swedish guy or Portugal or Italian guy how would it look? How would the landscape look, the benefits landscape? Everybody in Italy gets the benefits. Everybody in England is intended to get the benefits. But they don't get them. The Regal persons may have asked that this be resolved by the PM Johnson. It was just to ensure the citizens receive the money already sent with all intentions that it be paid. Johnson cut the benefit value in two and made it a means tested program and that is not what the Regals wanted; just only that the benefits will not be held indefinitely by the bank of there is My technological reason why this is happening. So now to see the will of the regals as they will have it, they will.....where is the torture stockade in the Zero Dark Thirty styling? Just Allow it mate, Allow it.
Apple 🍏 🍎 is spawning perfectly some kind of emotional impediments, some physical symptomatic, manifesting as a nerve pain and you are supposed to not understand this. Ask if you could get a chance to run a busy diner as an apple phone user and all you had to do is send $100 a day to a church in Biloxi and you know how much you earned collecting there but the account had $200 of her own funds in it while she had collected $1500 by 12:30 pm; a mixed fund So is the the 100 dollars to be sent a part of her money or the money collected? She moved her money out of the account and saw the 1500.00 clearly as the money collected there and so she felt sure to send the 100 to Biloxi. But some how you could send it and you were not taken for fraud and trespass.
Comments
Post a Comment