Davey Suzakawanoski says; The Fallout of my Racism and I am Sorry. August 18th, 2026. Did they have legal permission to contaminate the lake and ocean, causing environmental degradation and under what law? They had no such permissions as they followed the idolatry of their opinions or made errors in their calculations, causing an environmental catastrophe with almost permanent global consequences; carrying tortious costs and liability to the Canadian public. As such a special additional environmental income benefit will be paid with a total income support benefit of $10,000.00 per month to all Canadians to compensate them for the consumption of radiated poison water that affects the whole environment. Evaluating the practical consequences of using nuclear weapons or radioactive contamination to resolve racial anxieties or societal conflicts reveals a clear calculus: total net destruction. This is when one's feelings and opinions cannot be worth all the fish in the world. At the current hour, we see the depletion on fish stocks, the lower iron content in farm animals; in beef and pork on our table also so we replenish the earth and it's resources with deep marine salts and ferrate. We replenish the foods and drinks to ensure no environmental degradation. One ingredient in the foods has killed animal life; Cesium. One or two ingredients will help to resuscitate life. Fish stocks started dropping after Coca Cola gained mass appeal. It carried cyanide or Cesium and still does today. It's not necessary for flavour. But it's taste and popularity with unnecessary ingredients should not be an environmental trade off if you know what will happen on mass, just what that ingredient will do. We are not trying to treat people for syphiliis with a can of coke. But we understand that every loaf of bread with it's ingredients becomes eventually the wind, water, rain, the grass and soil. We have been concerned with degradable packaging but product Ingredients may kill marine life with less chance and more likelihood than plastic bags and bottles. The Thames will be blue again. Consequences of Environmental Contamination: Using radioactive material or nuclear water creates severe, indiscriminate systemic harms—including widespread agricultural collapse, devastation of livestock and ocean biosystems, and lethal radiation exposure across all human populations regardless of race. The Fallacy of Zero-Sum Racial Anxiety: Racially motivated anxieties operate on the false premise that one group's loss is another's gain. In reality, introducing catastrophic force to settle such anxieties results in mutual assured destruction. Utilitarian Calculus: The net utility of deploying nuclear or radioactive harm to appease ideological or racial fear is overwhelmingly negative, producing maximum suffering and zero long-term benefit for any surviving group. There are no fish for human survival and habitation in New Brunswick or New Poundland due to 3 Mile Island and Pickering Nuclear; Selafield also. In the late 70's, Davey Suzakawanoski sits down with with his high school friend named Philip Rushton. Rushton asks what happens if the white guy, black guy and Chinese guy piss in the toilet, how do we...? Who wins as if it's like rock, paper scissors? The answer is everyone is dead and radiated and so are the cows with low fish stocks if you use nuclear water to answer your intrinsically racist anxieties. A whole world of nuclear contamination ensues beginning in the late 70's when they had this conversation. Star Wars is the response to this idiocy with the blue milk in the desert, no crops and also you see DUNE. 3 mile Island, Selafield and the Pickering plant were designed, causing a deoxygenation of the world's atmosphere and water. Crops do not grow. Fish die. The soil is soil but does not support crops. From a purely practical standpoint, treating nuclear destruction as a resolution to social hierarchy or racial prejudice yields only systemic human extinction; extinction to all life in a slow but sure death; the smaller life forms first like bees and Cray fish in the contaminated areas. There are no Poisson. This is not the happy vie we can design for all to enjoy. Where is the universal income support benefit paid to all UK, all Canadian, all American and all Jamaican citizens? If you say something wrong or evil, is it less wrong if said with a Rushton accent? The core paradox in this scenario is how racial anxiety—historically centered on division, social hierarchy, and zero-sum competition—collapses instantly when paired with existential threats like nuclear radiation or widespread environmental destruction. In the hypothetical interaction involving figures like J. Philippe Rushton (a Canadian psychologist whose work on race and intelligence was widely discredited by the scientific community as pseudoscientific racism), racial hierarchies are constructed as a high-stakes "game" or social competition (e.g., comparing groups like "rock, paper, scissors"). However, framing nuclear radiation or water contamination as a "solution" or weapon within that racial framework breaks down on two fundamental levels: environmental reality and economic utility. Click here.
![]() |
Davey Suzakawanoski says; The Fallout of my Racism and I am Sorry.
August 18th, 2026.
Did they have legal permission to contaminate the lake and ocean, causing environmental degradation and under what law? They had no such permissions as they followed the idolatry of their opinions or made errors in their calculations, causing an environmental catastrophe with almost permanent global consequences; carrying tortious costs and liability to the Canadian public. As such a special additional environmental income benefit will be paid with a total income support benefit of $10,000.00 per month to all Canadians to compensate them for the consumption of radiated poison water that affects the whole environment.
Evaluating the practical consequences of using nuclear weapons or radioactive contamination to resolve racial anxieties or societal conflicts reveals a clear calculus: total net destruction. This is when one's feelings and opinions cannot be worth all the fish in the world. At the current hour, we see the depletion on fish stocks, the lower iron content in farm animals; in beef and pork on our table also so we replenish the earth and it's resources with deep marine salts and ferrate. We replenish the foods and drinks to ensure no environmental degradation. One ingredient in the foods has killed animal life; Cesium. One or two ingredients will help to resuscitate life. Fish stocks started dropping after Coca Cola gained mass appeal. It carried cyanide or Cesium and still does today. It's not necessary for flavour. But it's taste and popularity with unnecessary ingredients should not be an environmental trade off if you know what will happen on mass, just what that ingredient will do. We are not trying to treat people for syphiliis with a can of coke. But we understand that every loaf of bread with it's ingredients becomes eventually the wind, water, rain, the grass and soil. We have been concerned with degradable packaging but product Ingredients may kill marine life with less chance and more likelihood than plastic bags and bottles. The Thames will be blue again.
- Consequences of Environmental Contamination: Using radioactive material or nuclear water creates severe, indiscriminate systemic harms—including widespread agricultural collapse, devastation of livestock and ocean biosystems, and lethal radiation exposure across all human populations regardless of race.
- The Fallacy of Zero-Sum Racial Anxiety: Racially motivated anxieties operate on the false premise that one group's loss is another's gain. In reality, introducing catastrophic force to settle such anxieties results in mutual assured destruction.
- Utilitarian Calculus: The net utility of deploying nuclear or radioactive harm to appease ideological or racial fear is overwhelmingly negative, producing maximum suffering and zero long-term benefit for any surviving group. There are no fish for human survival and habitation in New Brunswick or New Poundland due to 3 Mile Island and Pickering Nuclear; Selafield also.
From a purely practical standpoint, treating nuclear destruction as a resolution to social hierarchy or racial prejudice yields only systemic human extinction; extinction to all life in a slow but sure death; the smaller life forms first like bees and Cray fish in the contaminated areas. There are no Poisson. This is not the happy vie we can design for all to enjoy.
Where is the universal income support benefit paid to all UK, all Canadian, all American and all Jamaican citizens?
If you say something wrong or evil, is it less wrong if said with a Rushton accent?
The core paradox in this scenario is how racial anxiety—historically centered on division, social hierarchy, and zero-sum competition—collapses instantly when paired with existential threats like nuclear radiation or widespread environmental destruction.
In the hypothetical interaction involving figures like J. Philippe Rushton (a Canadian psychologist whose work on race and intelligence was widely discredited by the scientific community as pseudoscientific racism), racial hierarchies are constructed as a high-stakes "game" or social competition (e.g., comparing groups like "rock, paper, scissors"). However, framing nuclear radiation or water contamination as a "solution" or weapon within that racial framework breaks down on two fundamental levels: environmental reality and economic utility.
Click here.
1. Environmental Indiscrimination vs. Racial Categorization
Racial anxieties rely on the belief that human groups can be distinctly categorized and separated in terms of outcomes or survival. Environmental hazards like radioactive contamination or nuclear wastewater completely dismantle this premise:
- Biotic Collapse: Ionizing radiation, heavy metal toxicity, and bioaccumulation do not select for race, nationality, or ideology. If water systems or marine ecosystems are irradiated, the resulting damage—such as plummeting fish stocks, genetic mutations, and food chain collapse—impacts all human populations reliant on those resources equally.
- Mutual Destruction: In the metaphor of "rock, paper, scissors," one element is supposed to conquer another. In radioactive contamination, the medium itself becomes lethal. The outcome is not a winner, but mutual extinction ("everyone is dead and radiated").
2. The Economic & Ecological Cost: "Not Worth the Low Fish Stocks"
Using extreme, destructive measures (like nuclear contamination) to assuage or act upon racial anxieties produces an absurd cost-benefit outcome:
- Ecosystem Ruin for Zero Gain: Marine ecosystems provide critical global protein and economic stability. Irradiating waters or collapsing fish stocks to satisfy a ideological desire for dominance destroys the foundational resources needed for any civilization—regardless of demographic makeup—to survive.
- The Irrationality of Ideological Extremism: When ideological anxiety reaches the point of willingness to destroy essential shared resources (like food supply and fresh water), the ideology abandons rational self-preservation. The loss of global fish stocks and arable land represents an immediate, irreversible drop in global carrying capacity that far outweighs any theoretical "victory" in a racial hierarchy.
Summary
Racial anxiety as a motivation for extreme environmental or nuclear measures is inherently self-defeating. Irradiating water or destroying global marine life to settle racial competition yields no winners—only a depleted biosphere, collapsed food chains, and universal fallout.

Comments
Post a Comment