Posts
Our new community group service involves 70 court dates or legal opinions at $120.00 each. Call today. 1-914-539-7655. Ask for Warren A. Lyon.
Our new community group service involves 70 court dates or legal opinions at $120.00 each. Call today. 1-914-539-7655. Ask for Warren A. Lyon.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The Jaser Trial; Ali Lutfi Jasar · TheJournal.ie Jul. 14, 2010 · The missing suspect, Jasar, was granted a retrial after he claimed that he was forced into signing a confession after being beaten. The truth is listening to Jasser recordings seem to indicate a story about a plan that he hoped to dramastise in a Netflix only movie. No Via rail train was attacked. No offence was committed. There are various Arabic dialects so....we cant really confirm what he was saying..what was his intention. It is uncertain. Can you say you have proof of an intent to commit when the translator paid by police, paid by the state is not necessarily impartial. There is some creative license when the accused can confirm what he said..what he intended. He hoped to sell the movie drama concept to a Canadian broadcaster also in his pursuit of the American dream.
The Jaser Trial; Ali Lutfi Jasar · TheJournal.ie Jul. 14, 2010 · The missing suspect, Jasar, was granted a retrial after he claimed that he was forced into signing a confession after being beaten. The truth is listening to Jasser recordings seem to indicate a story about a plan that he hoped to dramastise in a Netflix only movie. No Via rail train was attacked. No offence was committed. There are various Arabic dialects so....we cant really confirm what he was saying..what was his intention. It is uncertain. Can you say you have proof of an intent to commit when the translator paid by police, paid by the state is not necessarily impartial. There is some creative license when the accused can confirm what he said..what he intended. He hoped to sell the movie drama concept to a Canadian broadcaster also in his pursuit of the American dream.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Chapelton v Barry Urban District Council [1940] 1 KB 532 is an English contract law case on offer and acceptance and exclusion clauses. It stands for the proposition that a display of goods can be an offer and a whole offer, rather than an invitation to treat, and serves as an example for how onerous exclusion clauses can be deemed to not be incorporated in a contract. Click here for more.
Chapelton v Barry Urban District Council [1940] 1 KB 532 is an English contract law case on offer and acceptance and exclusion clauses. It stands for the proposition that a display of goods can be an offer and a whole offer, rather than an invitation to treat, and serves as an example for how onerous exclusion clauses can be deemed to not be incorporated in a contract. Click here for more.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Definition: This entry includes those persons residing in a country as refugees or internally displaced persons (IDPs). Each country's refugee entry includes only countries of origin that are the source of refugee populations of 5,000 or more. The definition of a refugee according to a United Nations Convention is "a person who is outside his/her country of nationality or habitual residence; has a well-founded fear of persecution because of his/her race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion; and is unable or unwilling to avail himself/herself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.": General Assembly Meeting: Status of internally displaced persons and refugees from Abkhazia, Georgia, and the Tskhinvali region/South Ossetia, Georgia
Definition: This entry includes those persons residing in a country as refugees or internally displaced persons (IDPs). Each country's refugee entry includes only countries of origin that are the source of refugee populations of 5,000 or more. The definition of a refugee according to a United Nations Convention is "a person who is outside his/her country of nationality or habitual residence; has a well-founded fear of persecution because of his/her race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion; and is unable or unwilling to avail himself/herself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution.": General Assembly Meeting: Status of internally displaced persons and refugees from Abkhazia, Georgia, and the Tskhinvali region/South Ossetia, Georgia
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
A new Angel Ronan article will demonstrate that contrary to some law society tribunal jurisprudence adjudicated before a District Court Judge, Section Seven charter rights do have relevant import to the discussion and the jurisprudence if it can be shown that there is a breach of the Law Society rules by state employees , a breach of procedure affecting communication of correspondence and the ability to respond, if there is criminality and deceitfulness or deception by the employee or contempt in the procedural process amounting to a deliberate interruption of someone's section seven Charter rights, affecting their career, their employment and their profession. The deliberate failure in due process during a Law Society hearing, affecting the Section 7 Charter Rights should amount to a withdrawal of the Tribunal matter. This is much like a section 8 or section 10 Charter breach that leads to a withdrawal of a criminal matter. The Law Society cannot gurantee a right to a career in law but an evident breach of the professional rules of conduct by society employees is known to have taken place and there is no absolute authority in the regulation of the legal profession that we should tolerate a breach of the rules by employees. We do not allow Absolute authority in the Church and nor is it tolerated or allowed to be abused by the Catholic Church. It does not exist. Employees of the Law society are not above the law and are accountable for their Illegal, embarrassing actions. They do not have absolute authority. It just cannot be tolerated and nor was it ever tolerated in our current Court and legal system and nor was it tolerated in the Court of Louis the 14th. It is contempt of Court, rendering you worthy of arrest in our current system or banishment to a penal colony in the West Indies or Canada as it may have happened in the history of our jurisprudence.
A new Angel Ronan article will demonstrate that contrary to some law society tribunal jurisprudence adjudicated before a District Court Judge, Section Seven charter rights do have relevant import to the discussion and the jurisprudence if it can be shown that there is a breach of the Law Society rules by state employees , a breach of procedure affecting communication of correspondence and the ability to respond, if there is criminality and deceitfulness or deception by the employee or contempt in the procedural process amounting to a deliberate interruption of someone's section seven Charter rights, affecting their career, their employment and their profession. The deliberate failure in due process during a Law Society hearing, affecting the Section 7 Charter Rights should amount to a withdrawal of the Tribunal matter. This is much like a section 8 or section 10 Charter breach that leads to a withdrawal of a criminal matter. The Law Society cannot gurantee a right to a career in law but an evident breach of the professional rules of conduct by society employees is known to have taken place and there is no absolute authority in the regulation of the legal profession that we should tolerate a breach of the rules by employees. We do not allow Absolute authority in the Church and nor is it tolerated or allowed to be abused by the Catholic Church. It does not exist. Employees of the Law society are not above the law and are accountable for their Illegal, embarrassing actions. They do not have absolute authority. It just cannot be tolerated and nor was it ever tolerated in our current Court and legal system and nor was it tolerated in the Court of Louis the 14th. It is contempt of Court, rendering you worthy of arrest in our current system or banishment to a penal colony in the West Indies or Canada as it may have happened in the history of our jurisprudence.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps