Angel Ronan Entwerfen™ Firm; Journal, Intellectual Property with ENTWERFEN ™ Litigation

Bank transfers with the required information. The real issue is that the receiving bank has to be sure there is no equivocation in your intentions. Why do you send it with your own name and then you included the intended recipients account number not not his name? Who are you? The bank will say they cannot apply the funds because the beneficiary name and account number do not match. So, who are you? We cannot always be sure of what you want just with one variable since people do make mistakes and that is just what happens in all of our best efforts but with two variables we can be sure of your intention of who to pay when it could be a lot of money involved. We must have certainty. Then you put the account number only. It might be the right number but what is the name of the recipient since...who are you? What do you think?

A daughter complained about her mothers national geographic photo of two young women bathing on a beach. They are about 20 years old and in the West Indies, at 20 years old you might still look kind of too young to be working at the hotel with all the fish and shellfish or shrimp they eat all day. The daughter thought the photo was inappropriate. She made one more call. Then all of a sudden, the wall where the photo was placed fell down when police came dressed as work men and complained that there was damp rot in the wall. They broke the dry wall, They stole the builder's insulation q and sprayed dog saliva on the wall. Then they covered it with new dry wall but did not The moisture took the dry wall and the concrete and took over the whole building just because they demanded that there would be no wall again for the photo to rest on since it seems to be a photo people don't like but it's not illegal if they are both over age in fact under US and Canadian Law but look youngish in the West Indies...from how they appear. They were charged for criminal damage and theft of insulation. The son said the photo was just kind of awkward in the laundry room if you are not African etc but it's "National Geographic." The police wanted to know how a Terrorist convict is walking around, making complaints on her mother? Her brother did not give her permission to say or do anything with that barn she is using to grow things since she never asked. She was in terrorist trespass and was convicted. The police lost their jobs. They asked later why only the brother took the photo off the wall? That led to an argument. So why didn't the daughter just steal the photo and , throw it out and then replace it with something else? She took a phot of the art and was charged for having suspicious, lude imagery on her phone when she showed the police. If you allege it's wrong then it's wrong to you and being in possession of inappropriate material is the appropriate charge.

Hmm....Carolina deep frying.

It is rumoured that the EU and the UK governments have decided to stipulate basic requirements for the Crypto Currency/Bit Coin. As you can see, it is never a hard currency with coins or paper but an electronic currency that must be; 1. Nothing more than an electronic payments system such as a Google Pay or Ali Pay or PayPal; 2. It can function as a payment card through the VISA global or MC MasterCard payment system. It is a debit card; 3. It is understood that the customer is essentially opening a bank account managed by the FDIC /CDIC and they will be able to see on their account portal the value of their balance in various foreign currencies. But, bitcoin has no value to reported on any foreign currency exchange. The general bitcoin balance or value will always be on par with the EUD dollar in your portal. So, if you use your US credit or debit card to pay $ USD 100 etc for the um "Bitcoin", then it's a purchase of the EUD; 4. There is a 1.5% fee for each transaction when purchasing your food, K Swiss or coffee; 5. You earn interest per day of .5% per month on your closing monthly balance; 6. That you confirm Bitcoin is an opportunity to educate the public on Financial matters, beginning with currency. Paying for items electronically does not change the legalities of currency; that "Bitcoin" and "Crypto" are brands essentially; not a currency. If you insist that it is a global currency of "no nation", what would that involve? Are you mad? But, keep insisting and you fighting the governing US law that will not be changed since there is nothing to change as we accept the usefulness of the Bitcoin crypto hype to take money from people like a Ponzi scheme by a Madoff and this cannot be condoned by a sitting President or his new association now that he has turned the new leaf; 7. The card will offer credit lines to the account holder of no more than $5000.00 with credit line interest of 3% on the credit lines monthly closing balance; 8. If these stipulations are not followed, offering any coin and currency without these provisos is a criminal offence under UK, US and EU law; finally 9. The monies collected by sellers are proceeds of crime and the monies will be confiscated with a Mareva injunction/ Anton Pillar order. See the case Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd. 10. We could be dealing with Gillette shaved and shampooed cave men or the Sasquatch that might be the Fire Chief ( God bless him) but we should not abuse them. See the case Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA. The Mareva [1980] 1 All ER 213. From the Bitcoin policy portfolio of Donald J. Triumph. From notes provided by the Financial Regulation Authority; written by Mark Firehem.

Hmm..... Albert's West Indian Foods!

On the issue of consent, the woman arrived at the address with a bag of tools that included the back scratcher, a bible and Lipton's soup mix since it was just a moment for friendship and a good chat. But, she would be paid for her time and or services. If it is agreed that she is paid before the soup is made but then she is not paid although the soup mix is taken by force and used.. used...then that is theft and robbery; a crime of violence has ensued with force. But, she was paid. The Ten commandments come to us as indigenous laws inscribed on stones; a simplification of the Egyptian code. The Leviticus traditions are received written laws on papyrus sheets provided to Israel from Egypt. But, we are not looking for any new King or hegemon at Angel Ronan. We have one on our Postal stamp and coins. We could use an aggressive Consultant. Back to our discussion; if the agreement is that payment is made after the soup is opened and made then, the act proceeds before payment. If payment afterwards is made pursuant to agreement then there is no issue. Click here.