Posts
When a woman is cheating on her husband and is found dead in her home, the question is not who is less morally righteous as between the two parties in the marriage. It would seem the husband may have had a few dates of his own but no sex or intercourse as they may call it. There is something else. She was a Sheriff Deputy that was letting people out of the jails if they would "give." She may have been having intercourses with male prisoners. The weapons on the wall of her home were just convenient for the National Guard or CIA assassins maybe who walked a 1 km back to their motorcycle they had left in the bush after the 5 am assassination. The question is who committed the murder. It is interesting that the man with whom she was cheating is not the suspect or that man's wife. It is interesting that the suspect is not the husband's new potential wife. It seems there is a hung jury when these people were not interviewed and why not; as suspects? The forensic evidence was incomplete and below the standard to be expected of any reasonably competent police service. So who can be sure with the file incomplete? The jury direction is the issue. They may have made a finding of mistral which is theirs to make such that there is insufficient evidence to convict as in there is an incomplete investigation. No further trial is warranted. The chance of verification of some forensics is gone now; the finger print or gun powder residue was not checked. So any conviction here is not safe. You let him go then. But who really pulled the trigger.
When a woman is cheating on her husband and is found dead in her home, the question is not who is less morally righteous as between the two parties in the marriage. It would seem the husband may have had a few dates of his own but no sex or intercourse as they may call it. There is something else. She was a Sheriff Deputy that was letting people out of the jails if they would "give." She may have been having intercourses with male prisoners. The weapons on the wall of her home were just convenient for the National Guard or CIA assassins maybe who walked a 1 km back to their motorcycle they had left in the bush after the 5 am assassination. The question is who committed the murder. It is interesting that the man with whom she was cheating is not the suspect or that man's wife. It is interesting that the suspect is not the husband's new potential wife. It seems there is a hung jury when these people were not interviewed and why not; as suspects? The forensic evidence was incomplete and below the standard to be expected of any reasonably competent police service. So who can be sure with the file incomplete? The jury direction is the issue. They may have made a finding of mistral which is theirs to make such that there is insufficient evidence to convict as in there is an incomplete investigation. No further trial is warranted. The chance of verification of some forensics is gone now; the finger print or gun powder residue was not checked. So any conviction here is not safe. You let him go then. But who really pulled the trigger.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
ANGEL RONIN AND A CLASSIC ALL DAY BREAKFAST AT THE WILMINGTON; a Victorian era pub once visited by Dickens. He was there on opening day where he received 1 of 100 free Happy Meals with the first 100 guests. This is where the Happy Meal concept had begun. You got a free Happy Meal Toffee with your bangers and mash din din. In our next set of case reviews, we will review the High Trees contract case and the Anns, White Tort cases.
ANGEL RONIN AND A CLASSIC ALL DAY BREAKFAST AT THE WILMINGTON; a Victorian era pub once visited by Dickens. He was there on opening day where he received 1 of 100 free Happy Meals with the first 100 guests. This is where the Happy Meal concept had begun. You got a free Happy Meal Toffee with your bangers and mash din din. In our next set of case reviews, we will review the High Trees contract case and the Anns, White Tort cases.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Dillons was a British bookseller founded in 1936, named after its founder and owner Una Dillon. Originally based in Bloomsbury in London, the company expanded under subsequent owners Pentos in the 1980s into a bookselling chain across the United Kingdom. In 1995 Pentos went into receivership and sold Dillons to Thorn EMI, which immediately closed 40 of the 140 Dillons bookstore locations. Of the remaining 100 stores, most kept the name Dillons, while the remainder were Hatchards and Hodges Figgis.[1][2] Within Thorn EMI, Dillons was placed in the HMV Group, which had been a division of Thorn EMI since 1986. EMI demerged from Thorn in August 1996, and Dillons-HMV remained an EMI holding.[3] Dillons was subsumed under rival chain Waterstones' branding in 1999, at which point the brand ceased to exist.
Dillons was a British bookseller founded in 1936, named after its founder and owner Una Dillon. Originally based in Bloomsbury in London, the company expanded under subsequent owners Pentos in the 1980s into a bookselling chain across the United Kingdom. In 1995 Pentos went into receivership and sold Dillons to Thorn EMI, which immediately closed 40 of the 140 Dillons bookstore locations. Of the remaining 100 stores, most kept the name Dillons, while the remainder were Hatchards and Hodges Figgis.[1][2] Within Thorn EMI, Dillons was placed in the HMV Group, which had been a division of Thorn EMI since 1986. EMI demerged from Thorn in August 1996, and Dillons-HMV remained an EMI holding.[3] Dillons was subsumed under rival chain Waterstones' branding in 1999, at which point the brand ceased to exist.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps