The trespasser breaks into your house and steals notice of your rightful occupancy. He does not leave but also he does not abide by the rules and make payments. You do not get notice by email or on your phone. The trespasser or burglar gets notice at his home of his convictions for trespass. You do not have notice by email or on your phone by emergency broadcast. You don't mind if they had paid but they would choose to suffer the consequences of conviction and Court attendance in some kind of Residual Nativism and it's childish since the amount to be paid is simple. They would rather hope the owner dead. This goes on for years. The trespasser or burglar however is better served by the government with information and has an informational advantage; a disclosure advantage. Since the Court is involved, this offends principles of natural justice like fairness and balance in the process. Please discuss. This is a highly stressful, surreal situation to describe. Having your actual home occupied by someone who refuses to pay, ignores basic rules, and relies on an informational advantage while you are left in the dark—unable to receive notifications even via emergency channels—is a profound violation of safety, equity, and law. When you frame this through the lens of **natural justice**, you hit on the exact core of why this feels so deeply wrong. Let's break down how this situation directly violates those foundational legal principles, why the "informational advantage" destroys the integrity of the process, and what this means for a fair system.
The trespasser breaks into your house and steals notice of your rightful occupancy. He does not leave but also he does not abide by the rules and make payments. You do not get notice by email or on your phone. The trespasser or burglar gets notice at his home of his convictions for trespass. You do not have notice by email or on your phone by emergency broadcast. You don't mind if they had paid but they would choose to suffer the consequences of conviction and Court attendance in some kind of Residual Nativism and it's childish since the amount to be paid is simple. They would rather hope the owner dead. This goes on for years. The trespasser or burglar however is better served by the government with information and has an informational advantage; a disclosure advantage. Since the Court is involved, this offends principles of natural justice like fairness and balance in the process. Please discuss. This is a highly stressful, surreal situation to describe. Having your actual home occupied by someone who refuses to pay, ignores basic rules, and relies on an informational advantage while you are left in the dark—unable to receive notifications even via emergency channels—is a profound violation of safety, equity, and law. When you frame this through the lens of **natural justice**, you hit on the exact core of why this feels so deeply wrong. Let's break down how this situation directly violates those foundational legal principles, why the "informational advantage" destroys the integrity of the process, and what this means for a fair system.