Angel Ronan Entwerfen™ Firm Litigation; Journal, Intellectual Property with the Real George™.

You are the police chief in some Canadian town and "Some Young Guy" wants to think you are taking pictures of a house. It looks like he was taking pictures of his own house. But he wants to think you were taking pictures now of his house or former house. So, he drives down the road to try and catch you in your Black Ford SUV and ask what are you doing. But do we have a crime? Can you affect a citizens arrest in your curiosity? You have assaulted someone in a white vehicle but you are looking for a black vehicle. You stopped a family in a white vehicle to ask them if they are the individuals who took the photo. Do we have a photo? Whose house is it? You assaulted someone who has no idea who you are. You are not really the Chief but you know a few. You should not be assaulted by some crazy guy driving down the road who never saw you because where were you? But is told by Tom that he thinks it was you; he thinks. You are at least a citizen who is not to be assaulted by a weird stranger. Where were you anyway? It does not really matter. There was no trespass on one's own lawn. This is the key point. You pretend to be the Chief and dress up. This is after you decided it's fair if the guy pretends he can assault you on the roadside, causing you fear and intimidation. You see that people in Ottawa receive their benefits consistently. But you noticed they are not being paid in your town where you really are the Chief kind of. So, you decide to call Ottawa's Chief and see what he would do if someone had turned off the benefits or the electric power in Ottawa. The Chief in Ottawa said he will turn the benefits on in your town if you want. He would turn the benefits back on or what else do we do with the job? It can't be that we aid and abet murders committed by people trespassing on another man's property. Did you know Andy is white? The real question, what are you don't there in that house or the other house? Are you asking the police services to kill someone in a cousin favour? When did you last do this? Are you trying to illegally possess all the homes? The dear former Queen and her husband would not do this. So, what are you doing? Thank you for your good wishes. The owner will be arriving soon and it's being rented. Warren was in there with Robert and Andy but they did not give Warren his key so he left. The neighbours called the police. That is all. Warren lived there for just about ten years. He still lives there. He is going to drill the lock and change it and you will not be obstructive. See for yourself. But your murderous covetousness is interrupting. New tenants are moving in after they pay. This is a a Scarborough Pickering white cave man allegory. Since, can't you just kill someone if you are white? Please discuss. How does the question differ if "Some Young Guy" is White or Black? Call the local Chinese restaurant and order "Some Young Guy".

SDGCK ASPIRE Reports: The intention of the greedy Creole Pirate bastard is to get everything in our socio-economy. This was the attitude of the Governor of Virginia in 1629 who was eventually made the Governor of Jamaica. His progeny have confirmed the same selfishly anthropology with more pirate refination. So then he absences speak basics of civil society like notice of claims against the owner or notice of ownership. He hopes those resistant to formalities occupy the properties and then there is a fight with the owners. The authorities may help one party or the other in the game. They are paid and obligated to help the owners. The pirate bastard hopes to see a game of struggles and the property stays unoccupied and then the pirate bastard believes he will have enough authority to decide if the owner does not survive the sociological bet. He will choose himself to take up all the property like cards in a Card game. Yet IAN Thorntoll has not occupied them legally. Who is the Creole Pirate Bastard affecting notice of ownership as to property in Canada? The individual exploiting gaps in formal documentation and counting on sociological chaos to claim property in Canada—functioning as the modern successor to that predatory colonial archetype—is **the unregistered or non-compliant adverse possessor**. There are consequences for all. But, when the actual legal occupants get notice it will help the system and truly work for the owner's protection. When they are not getting notice, it's like a subway system with no trains but you bought a ticket. The government therefore is not being served well. Why isn't there reasonable notice that is accessible to the legal occupants? Someone is playing the game of chance. It is the "unjust scales." Google "unjust scales." There has to be notice. Without it there may be a revolving door of illegal occupants taking a bet on not getting caught and also resisting the requisite payments required, not making payments. There are consequences affecting these illegal persons who should not be in Warren's property but they continue to do it anyway. It's like an insistence to live in that property without any obligation. The mortgage forgiveness is granted. You only have to pay $8 per day. This is good. Then you say the amount does not represent your worth. Even so, why have you not paid to at least maintain your aboriginal freedom or your freedom in general? It's not free but it's a good deal. The glass is half full. You can now buy more of all that you need to enjoy and you spend less on the mortgage. If you don't pay, you are in a stand off. We have these Hinduquois people ( Hindi Iroquois) who are not paying but who hope to set up their own system of ownership in condo buildings. This threatens the government. They are manifesting some kind of anthropology but with sophistication. But they are doing it, not abiding by the system and paying whom ever they wish. In Canadian property law, this strategy is known as **Adverse Possession** (commonly called "squatter's rights"). The "pirate game" being played relies entirely on exploiting the precise legal mechanism you described: hoping owners ignore formal legal protections, allowing an unauthorized occupant to stay on the land until he dies maybe effectively betting that the legal owner will fail to defend their rights. There is no such benefit to you if he dies. You cannot be there legally. Your accounts are affected. Your right to drive and eventually something will happen. Why fight? You have the money. Why not pay the nominal daily deposit requested? But maybe old aboriginal quotients for resistance die hard. You are a die hard. If you see the owners do not talk to them. They have a right to take a photo of the home you are squatting in. They only have to pay. No one is asking you leave. Your mortgage forgiveness was $502,000.00. Your former payment was $2810.00. Ensure your space in that place. The order is on you now but when do you get a $10,000.00 final payment offer to live in a house in Canada or North America? You only had to pay $8.00, $7.00 or $6.00 per day but you never did. Then the final order came. Just pay what is required under the final order. But, if someone gives you $300,000.00 or more you have a father or a kin. You thank him. Do as he says; not all of these murderous ungrateful ways. You have been weighted, measured and balanced but found in the sadness or having wrong attitudes. This is not what you spit on the billboard as the cross walk guard.

So, the Egyptian came and caught the humanoid. They took him out like they would have to eventually take out the first Saul since, like Saul, he was told to leave it alone and stop working to make everything, everyone sad. Saul was like the sad marquis. His remains were thrown in the river and floated downstream to the lands now known as Iraq or Babylon in ancient history; all gone now. Two things fkoated5 down stream to that land; the emotions and building acumen of Egypt and also the temperament of the first humanoid that is now the cheeky, angry monkey. His DNA is the soul of that Babylon that threatened Egypt and Israel, eventually sacking it over time and occupying it after Saul took on the desert Babylon girls as adoptions; the Senacharib. You see the Israeli iteration of Egypt involves some formal family structure; that this is just a father, a mother or sister or brother as immediate family; and then there is a coitous partner of the opposite gender with whom you make the grand family but the persons in the immediate family are not both the coitous partner and also immediate family. That is not right. We say no to this Babylon as they did not set these rules down. It also seems the Amnon and Tamar were more the Babylonian desert people as children of Michal who had a bush woman's learning curve and very nice, thick curly hair. Scrooge Oliver is, when confronted with the trained legal qualified, the Babylon orphan Sabateur, the eternal orphan but with Court jester comedics. Maybe the star of David should just be a triangle instead of a warning on live between these two historically recognised peoples; with one triangle right side up and the other down. But, the figs are still growing yet there is something wrong on the down side. If you followed Egypt while in Israel, Senacharib comes to look, then breaks in as he spits, kills, steals and destroys. He says he has to do it since it cannot be you. It has to be him he says. But in his building, there is some thing missing. It might even be the benefits. Then there is an emptiness. He is not content with this Babylon. He wants what you have.