Angel Ronan Entwerfen™ Firm; Journal, Intellectual Property with ENTWERFEN ™ Litigation

January 6th, 2024. Income support for all citizens is a normal capitalist economic custom; Could you run an economy in such a way to achieve some anthropological, ancestral or developmental identity or is it to confirm some motive? In all normal functioning capitalist economies, it is the custom that all citizens have an income support. China is the most capitalist economy in the world next to Japan. They have both expanded their economies and their de facto territory by using their understanding of pure aggressive capitalism and have taken over all the English countries industrially with a simple application of capitalism's principles. First, they assured strong domestic markets at home by providing a sufficient income support for all their citizens at home in China and also in Japan. They obeyed all of capitalism's discoveries in light of automation. But, what about America as a fledgling economy; fledgling only because its resistance and failure to provide income support for all citizens at amounts that ensure sufficient consumer stimulus and occupation of one's own economy and one's urban spaces has failed. This has caused negative market growth since the problem was identified in the late 1850's during history's first major upswing in the mechanization of labor. We call this mechanization the automation of labor today. While income support was customary in Europe for centuries as the most central of economic principles taken from ancient Egypt and Rome seen in Prince Joseph's ration in Egypt, it is also displayed in Jesus teaching; where he tells Herod to render unto the people and unto Caesar. The income support is more of a rediscovery for the English and the Americans whose dna is combined with North American aboriginality and prone to resist the whole system instead of just enjoying the ancient principles that give effect to community happiness, community safety, consumer stimulus, strong domestic markets and to the vital life of the human without the blood and sweat in shyster-ing huckster-ing, hunting and the gathering. Establishing the ancient economic principles as against the phenomenon of aboriginal resistance is really a description of the work of assimilation. In this assimilation of North America to the more established Economic principles that have Roman and African origin, we discover that North America in its first contact with the outside world was like a Junior Africa in some ways but lost in the land of nod after the continental Pangea divide. This lost and uninitiated condition remained until men from the east came to the western hemisphere; some of them black Africans and some of them were Europeans like Hernán Cortés. There was also Estevanico (c. 1500–1539), also known as Esteban de Dorantes and Estevanico the Moor, was the first person of African descent to explore North America. It looks like he travelled around Jamaica and Cuba and saw the aboriginals who he described as appearing like West Coast Africans; Nigerian or Ghanian. Estevanico (c. 1500–1539), also known as Esteban de Dorantes and Estevanico the Moor, was the first person of African descent to explore North America. Little is known about his background but contemporary accounts described him as a "negro alárabe" or "Arabic-speaking black man" native to Azemmour, Morocco. In 1522, he was sold as a slave to the Spanish nobleman Andrés Dorantes de Carranza in the Portuguese-controlled Moroccan town of Azemmour. After automation, how do you maintain a domestic market with able and willing consumers that have money to actually buy your goods if the citizen and former worker that is now suffering joblessness does not have money or income from a job that would provide some reasonable money? This money is so that he can participate in his central economic purpose as the consumer and buyer of goods; and now without money he is obsolete you might say. But, he is not obsolete because he has needs that are to be fulfilled with buying and purchasing goods. But the solution is not to, then, bring foreigners from Asia's overflow of people or Europe's overflow of people because there are horrible social and economic problems that are suffered by the North American in the shameful view of well funded non Anglo Europeans or non Anglo Asians who witness this underfunding every day. Reducing North American taxes is not the solution as it reduces the government's ability to respond to problems. But, the maybe the solution is a purposeful balance; a small provision of income support to every citizen at no less than $300.00 per day and also a small increase in sales taxes that will also help to make our buying of goods a more thoughtful experience so that we avoid wasteful consumption. All goals are achieved and the social and economic problems are sorted out with balanced design. We prevent fraud in the banks like its a rat in the 4 star Michelin kitchen. Good design is essential to a good, safe truck or car cabin with soo much thoughtfulness and human consideration; so crazy thoughtful....WOW and no North American is dying in front of the well funded foreigners any more who technically own the Capitol Building in every state with the loans we pay to Europe and Asia!!!! The only way to balance the bountiful robotic supply against the lessened and lost consumer ability to buy is to give every citizen an income support that really amounts to a small economic fraction of what you save in human wages after the robotic automation takes the place of human labor. This fraction of money saved can be as small as $6.00 per hour (10 cents per minute) 24 hours per day; 365 days per year to fulfill our purpose to ensure there is sufficient consumer stimulus and buying power in the market; purchasing and consuming the robotically made goods. They, the consumer, also fulfill their purpose 24 hours per day as the key focal point of the economy. They are observed on smart devices that include phones and tvs. The money provided enables them to pay the 24 hour phone bill. Their government spends less money on the ills that would be caused by moneylessness in any population and more time is spent collecting money on all human consumer activities. They lend you money when you are in debt with your "dog tired" discussions about all the human problems as caused by the moneylessness that is determined or caused by job automation. While it is obvious how to efficiently and lovingly, self defensively solve it, you do not solve it but continue to spend energy embarrassing yourselves on TV just talking about the problems. You talk about people dying and freezing or starving in your economy. Do you pay all citizens an income support? Sze Sze!! But what does it really matter if the lives of your people do not matter to you? All the little lessons of capitalism you did not respect eventually do add up. You did not have enough consumers as real buyers with real money for too many decades. So, your car company is in debt to the government. The government sold the car company debt to Asian companies. So, now the Asians own you. You still don't have enough consumers as real buyers with real money in your current way; as you are now. In respecting that all normal capitalist economies provide an income support to all citizens in amounts sufficient to cover all human economic necessities on a daily basis are their any Canadians or Americans who have not received their income support yet; and why? Have you done anything about it? How long have you known of the problem? What can we infer from your inaction in this case or other cases? You are watching the snow man melt in your garage and if you want to save him, you will put him back outside where he won't melt as you watch him disappear. The lawn is brown and you just need to turn the water on to give it a break from the heat so it goes green again. The chocolate bunny is melting on the counter. It's Easter and time for church. Have you put the bunny back in the fridge so we are not disappointed and sad as you just let him melt down and away? When we watch TV aren't you invited into the lives of others to care for them and love them? This is what our lives involve. What can we do? Can we initiate a payment so the current expected income support arrives at an account where we know the citizen is certain to receive the money; just when you know he is or she is not recieving it at the present time at an account about which he was not notified as a child? Click here for more.