Posts
I think the CEO for Untied Health is actually not dead and had Christmas dinner in Texas as the driver for the governor. There is no murder, no dead body and no autopsy of the dead. But we have a fraud on the Court and the People of the United States for which the accused requires compensation. It's Steven Murmeror Lawrence. He has criminal antecedents. He is trying to kill. There is a description of a shooter in New York and it looks like Aunt Jemima with a loose hat on but her perm shows and her necklace but with a mask. The police are looking for a suspect that fits the description but fitting the description is not actual commission of the offence. A hat and mask cannot in themselves stand trial and any one could have worn that hat and mask. We need to know if this is the actual puller of the trigger at that moment in time. They see the photos of aunt Jemima on the pan cake box with the hat and mask. So they go to speak with her. Can she be convicted for the crime in New York and what do they have to prove for conviction in New York? In New York, the legal system has high standards for proving a person committed a crime. Simply "fitting a description" or owning similar clothing is not enough for a conviction. For the person you described to be convicted in a New York court, the prosecution must meet several strict requirements. 1. The Burden of Proof: Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Under New York Criminal Procedure Law § 70.20, no person can be convicted unless the evidence establishes their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. * Not Just "Probable": It is not enough to show that she "probably" did it or that she is the most likely suspect because of her appearance. * Moral Certainty: The jury or judge must be "firmly convinced" of her guilt. If there is a "real possibility" that she is not the person who pulled the trigger, the law requires an acquittal. 2. Proof of Identity The prosecution must prove two distinct things beyond a reasonable doubt: * The Offense: That the crime (the shooting) actually happened. * The Commission: That this specific individual was the person who committed it. As you noted, a hat and a mask cannot stand trial. In cases where a suspect's face was covered, the prosecution must find "corroborating" evidence to link the individual to the act. This might include: * Distinctive Characteristics: While a common hat or mask might not be enough, specific "internal patterns" or unique wear and tear on clothing (like the necklace or specific details of the perm mentioned) can sometimes be used as circumstantial evidence. * Physical Evidence: DNA on the mask, fingerprints on the weapon, or gunpowder residue on her hands. * Other Evidence: GPS data from a phone, video showing her entering or leaving the scene, or witness testimony from someone who saw her put on or take off the mask. 3. Elements of the Crime Beyond just identity, the state must prove every "element" of the specific charge. For a shooting, this typically includes: * Intent: That she intended to cause the result (e.g., intended to kill or cause serious physical injury). * The Act: That she was the "actual puller of the trigger" at that exact moment. Entering 306 Manhattan Drive and 24 Arlene Crescent would not be a crime for Warren A. Lyon. He can wear a hat to his front door.
I think the CEO for Untied Health is actually not dead and had Christmas dinner in Texas as the driver for the governor. There is no murder, no dead body and no autopsy of the dead. But we have a fraud on the Court and the People of the United States for which the accused requires compensation. It's Steven Murmeror Lawrence. He has criminal antecedents. He is trying to kill. There is a description of a shooter in New York and it looks like Aunt Jemima with a loose hat on but her perm shows and her necklace but with a mask. The police are looking for a suspect that fits the description but fitting the description is not actual commission of the offence. A hat and mask cannot in themselves stand trial and any one could have worn that hat and mask. We need to know if this is the actual puller of the trigger at that moment in time. They see the photos of aunt Jemima on the pan cake box with the hat and mask. So they go to speak with her. Can she be convicted for the crime in New York and what do they have to prove for conviction in New York? In New York, the legal system has high standards for proving a person committed a crime. Simply "fitting a description" or owning similar clothing is not enough for a conviction. For the person you described to be convicted in a New York court, the prosecution must meet several strict requirements. 1. The Burden of Proof: Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Under New York Criminal Procedure Law § 70.20, no person can be convicted unless the evidence establishes their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. * Not Just "Probable": It is not enough to show that she "probably" did it or that she is the most likely suspect because of her appearance. * Moral Certainty: The jury or judge must be "firmly convinced" of her guilt. If there is a "real possibility" that she is not the person who pulled the trigger, the law requires an acquittal. 2. Proof of Identity The prosecution must prove two distinct things beyond a reasonable doubt: * The Offense: That the crime (the shooting) actually happened. * The Commission: That this specific individual was the person who committed it. As you noted, a hat and a mask cannot stand trial. In cases where a suspect's face was covered, the prosecution must find "corroborating" evidence to link the individual to the act. This might include: * Distinctive Characteristics: While a common hat or mask might not be enough, specific "internal patterns" or unique wear and tear on clothing (like the necklace or specific details of the perm mentioned) can sometimes be used as circumstantial evidence. * Physical Evidence: DNA on the mask, fingerprints on the weapon, or gunpowder residue on her hands. * Other Evidence: GPS data from a phone, video showing her entering or leaving the scene, or witness testimony from someone who saw her put on or take off the mask. 3. Elements of the Crime Beyond just identity, the state must prove every "element" of the specific charge. For a shooting, this typically includes: * Intent: That she intended to cause the result (e.g., intended to kill or cause serious physical injury). * The Act: That she was the "actual puller of the trigger" at that exact moment. Entering 306 Manhattan Drive and 24 Arlene Crescent would not be a crime for Warren A. Lyon. He can wear a hat to his front door.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Click for more. There are approximately 85,400 businesses in the UK that earn roughly £500 in sales tax per day. If you include all businesses that earn at least £500 in sales tax (meaning everyone from your local successful pub up to global giants like Amazon), the total is approximately 286,300 businesses (about 12% of all VAT-registered entities in the UK). This does not include transit or subway fares. At 286300 businesses paying at least £500 as sales tax per day, then The result of 286,300 \times 500 is £143,150,000 per day. Many of them are paying more than that. At 160,000 businesses earning at least £1000.00 per day in sales tax/VAT, then the sales tax revenue on these businesses alone is £160,000,000.00. At 200,900 businesses earning at least £2000 per day in sales tax, then w are confident we can see sales tax generation of £401,800,000.00 per day. If the population actually is only 375,000 people in the UK with citizenship to receive benefits, then we can easily pay £250 per day as income support benefit; certainly. This is in spite of the marooned scavenger ancestry with the story in their flesh to communicate. 375,000 x £250 per day is £93,750,000 in daily income support benefits. 375,000 x £150.00 per day is £56,250,000.00 income support benefits. The Rex may will can must receive £,50,000 per day. We would like to see the population grow or remain stable into erms if numbers with the cost of averages in terms of monthly or yearly births vs deaths. So, we have to ensure they are funded and can eat as well as fund their homes or shelter. To achieve all goals, we can always add a percentage to the sale tax from time to time if we would ever be questioning if we have enough. We gain nothing when benefits are not paid. A UK life is lost. The benefit is to be paid to everyone when they have employment or when they do not have employment. That is the UK standard without foreign interruptions. The Police should know when to stop the crime of benefit theft and fraud at the banks. Maybe one a week then sales tax may be 50% or 100%. It's a consumption tax that provides national revenue and helps to cool "over consumption" of that would ever be a concern. A little more Money inspires real consumer stimulus. 1 cent a minute or an extra £14.40 a day is worth an extra £5256 per year. The income support benefit increases once a year by 2,% to buffer affordability, that is "purchasing ability" against the increase in the cost of goods.
Click for more. There are approximately 85,400 businesses in the UK that earn roughly £500 in sales tax per day. If you include all businesses that earn at least £500 in sales tax (meaning everyone from your local successful pub up to global giants like Amazon), the total is approximately 286,300 businesses (about 12% of all VAT-registered entities in the UK). This does not include transit or subway fares. At 286300 businesses paying at least £500 as sales tax per day, then The result of 286,300 \times 500 is £143,150,000 per day. Many of them are paying more than that. At 160,000 businesses earning at least £1000.00 per day in sales tax/VAT, then the sales tax revenue on these businesses alone is £160,000,000.00. At 200,900 businesses earning at least £2000 per day in sales tax, then w are confident we can see sales tax generation of £401,800,000.00 per day. If the population actually is only 375,000 people in the UK with citizenship to receive benefits, then we can easily pay £250 per day as income support benefit; certainly. This is in spite of the marooned scavenger ancestry with the story in their flesh to communicate. 375,000 x £250 per day is £93,750,000 in daily income support benefits. 375,000 x £150.00 per day is £56,250,000.00 income support benefits. The Rex may will can must receive £,50,000 per day. We would like to see the population grow or remain stable into erms if numbers with the cost of averages in terms of monthly or yearly births vs deaths. So, we have to ensure they are funded and can eat as well as fund their homes or shelter. To achieve all goals, we can always add a percentage to the sale tax from time to time if we would ever be questioning if we have enough. We gain nothing when benefits are not paid. A UK life is lost. The benefit is to be paid to everyone when they have employment or when they do not have employment. That is the UK standard without foreign interruptions. The Police should know when to stop the crime of benefit theft and fraud at the banks. Maybe one a week then sales tax may be 50% or 100%. It's a consumption tax that provides national revenue and helps to cool "over consumption" of that would ever be a concern. A little more Money inspires real consumer stimulus. 1 cent a minute or an extra £14.40 a day is worth an extra £5256 per year. The income support benefit increases once a year by 2,% to buffer affordability, that is "purchasing ability" against the increase in the cost of goods.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps