Angel Ronin Entwerfen™ Firm; Journal, Intellectual Property with ENTWERFEN ™ Litigation

The Community Investment Legal Fund

Blue Lights

A letter from F.D. Roosevelt; You have occupied your condos and new properties all over Canada with Indians on benefits paid by India or Chinese and other Asians with their Asian benefits. They don't feel needy. They don't steal as much so you hire them. Eleanor wanted to know what people owned before she would agree that they get the benefit as she was class competitive; not from an established eastern seaboard family where the benefit was taught and thought of as a ration or citizens compensation or commonwealth so we can all buy soap, avoid the tuberculosis and keep us all safe and clean from communicable diseases whenever those hard times could affect us all, including the farmers. The benefit does not make you wealthy but ensured a common safety. So, where was Eleanor really from? She was certainly American by the time she got to the bite house. I told her we could afford to send £1 million pounds a day to the English or enable them to just take it when they want but we have to ensure every North American ( every Canadian and every American) is covered and cared for first with an income support benefit. In the end, she saw the two big wars partially based on the economy shutting down due to issues caused by mechanized labor with people out of work and not having money in many parts of the country, a job famine. They always had income support money in Vermont, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. This was to expand across the country but it did not. How else would people have or get money in a job famine? We drafted our own new deal. Eleanor agreed having watched and suffered the American the experience of Joblessness. She signed and eventually help draft the United Nations documents. The economy is not a mystery. The ration or income support or dole is as old as the bible or Damascus or Portofino. Everybody contributes that includes the wealthy so everybody benefits. To argue with this belies the truth of your less advanced origins or human expectations. Yet we have learned from our experiences. Still, the US is slow to comply. Other countries have complied fully. Without people immigrating to the US and Canada with income support money, we would be in an economic depression today. We read the calculation of this whole experience and its kind of a signature of some hysterical anthropism that is excited about words like "genocide" or "economy" that finds its way in some incessant need to arrive in the decision maker's seat but it dithers and squanders the moment and what do we get except defeat and occupation by other people and other cultures; this is while the food is reasonably good and also the architecture in addition to the new regenerative vehicles but the money has not been added to the economy so we can buy or lease the vehicle, pay for the food; and yet very seldom would these people present a Pasta Bolognese to you without sauce or a building without a roof yet they present an economy to you without money or insufficient money? Before they input the money as required by law so all Canadians benefit equally and so Canadians can buy or rent some new built property, the solution is to bring more people with money from else where. We can do both. Truthfully, if the economy is a game, you are not winning. You are losing in front of the Swedes, the Swiss and the Russians. But you fight if it's hockey. Maybe, if nothing else, you are fighting yourself, fighting logic. You should be competitive in terms of income support benefit paid to your people, to your team. How could you get the economy to serve your tenacious hockey agenda, paying every citizen as the law demands? Are you fighting the laws? The lecturer realized that everyone has to balance brakes so we have to, in the same way for mutual safety, balance the economy. Our expenditure in "job cancelling£ automation that increases supply of goods with 24 hour per day robotic labor that only requires KWh but not salaries or wages must be balanced with a purposely right expenditure in the funding of buyer demand for goods in the buyers ability to pay. Where do people get the money from in the joblessness or moneylessness caused by automation? The answer is that we provide them an income support benefit to fill the stadium. We need people with money to fill the stadiums. The energy in the economy has to balance. It is not mysterious. It is easy to solve. Everyone lovingly receives this benefit money. Cosmetically white people or the whites have not submitted to this fact. The Europeans have agreed. The cosmetically white are either missing a gene in their human composition, maybe a self compassion gene, or they are just hurtfully resistant. Money is the fastest path to peace. Scavenging is not peace. Yet scavenging may be the decision maker's culture. He has not input the money. He has tried to interrupt the benefit money and argued that he is trying to save. He is convicted for genocide. Compliance with a command of a Monarch or compliance with your governing laws should be your only goal. If you need money, add a percentage to your sales tax. Compliance with the law should be your only goal. The molecular power that comes from cutting an atom occupies the territory with radiation and it is uninhabitable. There are no people. But in the ultimate victory in the conflict you need to occupy the territory, the homes and vehicles. See every home and vehicle as territory. Who is in the home? Who is in the vehicle? We need to cut or dissect the variables or time and time and money and find the purposefully right amount of money to be paid into consumer buyer demand to balance out the money and time spent on robotic automation or technological automation. You need money to occupy the home and vehicle; and enjoy your foods and culture. It's a free country but your have to pay. The natives that have come to a cosmetically white arrival in society need to eat and drink their foods as chosen for their nutritional and/ or cosmetic benefits and we need to pay for these foods. The people who occupy your territory after the light self nuking disaster called Pickering Nuclear tend to be from countries where they are providing their citizens a sufficient benefit to get around the world and buy, rent or lease any property any where or to just be settled any where they choose such as in Canada. One issue for their arrival is that you have increased the numbers of home and condo units at a rate faster than the host population can absorb them. You encouraged people from other countries to arrive to source a surrogate population from another more obedient UN /King George VI / King Charles III submitted, obedient population in the world. These nice brown, black and yellow peoples bought the condo in Waterloo or rent the Condo in Barrie or Burlington. Maybe they bought a condo in Toronto. Yet, the buildings remain 70% unoccupied and then you built another condo. Yet, you have not provided your own population sufficient monies to join the surrogate population from other lands you have brought to Canada to occupy these new, exciting properties. It's a free country if you want to buy it or rent it if you can pay. The surrogate population is provided money from their governments pursuant to UN protocol for a standard income support that satisfied all basic human daily needs. You understand this. Your Canadian or English government is obligated to provide these benefits in the same way as these other, more submissive and cooperative governments; logically submissive and also obedient to the UN. The writer's real father and teacher is white so you can run with the observation you take from this and make your economy work. It's a free world and you can live where ever you want so long as you have the money to pay. These condos, many of them, are built with Federal government dollars as raised through sales tax generation; sales tax we pay and this money is provided to the builders so long as the builder promises that a fraction of the units are to be used as government housing. As the whole project is federally funded, it's kind of public property. But, you can't just take the decorations or the books in the condo library because it is publicly funded. They were purchased for learning or the book is in the condo as decorative. But you can't live there legally without a paid agreement just as you can't enter Algonquin Park without paid agreement unless you attended on the free days once a month on the last Friday of the month. There are encampments all over the country due to the fact that the properties set as housing are not being used for housing but most importantly, the income support benefit provided to Canadians in Canada is insufficient to afford any paid agreement at the regular rate. Also, the benefit is not provided to all citizens contrary to the UN treaties and it is not provided in equal amounts contrary to S.15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. If you approach the building and ask for housing in an application, then the building manager will debit the Federal government for the rent or add it to the accounts so it's an expense to be calculated against revenue or you take a lesser rent and the difference is an expense or loss to be used against revenue. You could just register the management company as a non profit or are you just cosmetically white, injecting Smirnoff in your thumbs? You do not see anyone but the cosmetically white people in encampments. We do not know what happened or why. They may have been mugged at a Casino by undercover cops (it could never really happen except at Casino Rama) or evil bank employees (now former) do evil things like hold the card and refuse to give it back but we can disburse the encampments with emergency bank debit cards. They can buy clothing and get to a hotel. Everyone will be entitled to the emergency bank card for 10 years so we apologize to ourselves for our meanness and self defeatism. Listen to Billy Graham's word today; every day for five minutes. You built nice buildings but your are surrounding yourself ING with something socio-economically ugly and you refuse to solve it lovingly with an emergency debit payment card to get people moving. These encampments are very ugly so they have chosen to encamp in condo parking garages before they are taken to old, abandoned car companies and assisted in these buildings as make- shift shelters, provided phones, debit cards and surgically implanted Meta eye wear. Could it recharge from human body heat and human movement as proposed by Alusra? So, we need to know why there are no book bar code detectors or subway turnstile type barriers at the Ivey main Weldon University of Ontario Western library. I mean the Western UWO Weldon library. The school is to be brought back under the umbrella of the University of London to confirm Western's origins and to assist in the quiet path toward a certain future for the school that is an ideal quiet space for meaningful undergraduate contemplation and study away from Toronto, University of Wisconsin for a good football or hockey scholarship or far away from North Western. Its just too busy and noisy there in those places. The Entrepreneurship Centre and the Ivey Centre are ridiculously genius, opulent spaces for quiet contemplation of your job prospects in an AI world. But, there is an exam coming up and a final exam so, this is serious work. BPP at the University of London will provide the module packs for the Ivey School. But, the pirate lecturer will not hold the successful graduates who achieve the successful results in chemistry, business or business ransom; nor will they cut the result in two. Let God decide how long an A+ graduate lives. Will they keep stealing things out of his bags as he travels to cut him down? So, we cannot MPAC price fix before we "people save" or we do both. The law does not require MPAC but it does under the UN Native UDHR article 25. We are all native some where in the world. Essentially the motivation is to make the economy work effectively if it's not to save the population but use the population to generate a safer, more productive economy. You can price reasonable ( never goes down but never up very much) fix the value of property but you must also, to balance it out, price fix the ability to pay. Our "ability to pay" with the benefit provided must always go up. I was at the Ivey School of business the other day and there is a lot of work going on. How do we effectively stimulate the economy? We could do this by adding an extra penny a minute to consumer income support benefits. We would have to set a bench mark figure for the year first; an amount that we will say is the set lowest amount for that year and the income support cannot be less than that. From year to year, it cannot be less than that amount. But it can be higher. We could day the base amount is $110,000.00 per year. Of we increase the once support by an additional 1 cent per minute, then it's $115,000.00 per year. The amount suggested in the current 2025 economy satisfies legal requirements under the UDHR article 25 and also the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. This is the base amount that is to increase by 2% a year to keep pace with potential inflation. Sometimes there is deflation when there are too many goods for sale and not enough purchasers where there is more supply than there is actual demand. After the 2% increase, we could inspire extra consumer stimulus with half penny or one whole penny increases in the benefit payments as stimulus. But, we would never reduce the benefit payment below the set amount for that year. If we added 2% to the $110,000.00 for the year 2026, we get $112200.00. We could cool the economy or in fact cool economic activity by raising the sales tax by a 1% when the decision maker would deem it necessary. Bless him or her. Click here.